Cargando…

Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task

Background: Web cameras are increasingly part of the standard hardware of most smart devices. Eye movements can often provide a noninvasive “window on the brain,” and the recording of eye movements using web cameras is a burgeoning area of research. Objective: This study investigated a novel methodo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bott, Nicholas T., Lange, Alex, Rentz, Dorene, Buffalo, Elizabeth, Clopton, Paul, Zola, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00370
_version_ 1783246488137105408
author Bott, Nicholas T.
Lange, Alex
Rentz, Dorene
Buffalo, Elizabeth
Clopton, Paul
Zola, Stuart
author_facet Bott, Nicholas T.
Lange, Alex
Rentz, Dorene
Buffalo, Elizabeth
Clopton, Paul
Zola, Stuart
author_sort Bott, Nicholas T.
collection PubMed
description Background: Web cameras are increasingly part of the standard hardware of most smart devices. Eye movements can often provide a noninvasive “window on the brain,” and the recording of eye movements using web cameras is a burgeoning area of research. Objective: This study investigated a novel methodology for administering a visual paired comparison (VPC) decisional task using a web camera.To further assess this method, we examined the correlation between a standard eye-tracking camera automated scoring procedure [obtaining images at 60 frames per second (FPS)] and a manually scored procedure using a built-in laptop web camera (obtaining images at 3 FPS). Methods: This was an observational study of 54 clinically normal older adults.Subjects completed three in-clinic visits with simultaneous recording of eye movements on a VPC decision task by a standard eye tracker camera and a built-in laptop-based web camera. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using Siegel and Castellan's kappa formula. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the correlation between VPC performance using a standard eye tracker camera and a built-in web camera. Results: Strong associations were observed on VPC mean novelty preference score between the 60 FPS eye tracker and 3 FPS built-in web camera at each of the three visits (r = 0.88–0.92). Inter-rater agreement of web camera scoring at each time point was high (κ = 0.81–0.88). There were strong relationships on VPC mean novelty preference score between 10, 5, and 3 FPS training sets (r = 0.88–0.94). Significantly fewer data quality issues were encountered using the built-in web camera. Conclusions: Human scoring of a VPC decisional task using a built-in laptop web camera correlated strongly with automated scoring of the same task using a standard high frame rate eye tracker camera.While this method is not suitable for eye tracking paradigms requiring the collection and analysis of fine-grained metrics, such as fixation points, built-in web cameras are a standard feature of most smart devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, smart phones) and can be effectively employed to track eye movements on decisional tasks with high accuracy and minimal cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54875872017-07-12 Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task Bott, Nicholas T. Lange, Alex Rentz, Dorene Buffalo, Elizabeth Clopton, Paul Zola, Stuart Front Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Web cameras are increasingly part of the standard hardware of most smart devices. Eye movements can often provide a noninvasive “window on the brain,” and the recording of eye movements using web cameras is a burgeoning area of research. Objective: This study investigated a novel methodology for administering a visual paired comparison (VPC) decisional task using a web camera.To further assess this method, we examined the correlation between a standard eye-tracking camera automated scoring procedure [obtaining images at 60 frames per second (FPS)] and a manually scored procedure using a built-in laptop web camera (obtaining images at 3 FPS). Methods: This was an observational study of 54 clinically normal older adults.Subjects completed three in-clinic visits with simultaneous recording of eye movements on a VPC decision task by a standard eye tracker camera and a built-in laptop-based web camera. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using Siegel and Castellan's kappa formula. Pearson correlations were used to investigate the correlation between VPC performance using a standard eye tracker camera and a built-in web camera. Results: Strong associations were observed on VPC mean novelty preference score between the 60 FPS eye tracker and 3 FPS built-in web camera at each of the three visits (r = 0.88–0.92). Inter-rater agreement of web camera scoring at each time point was high (κ = 0.81–0.88). There were strong relationships on VPC mean novelty preference score between 10, 5, and 3 FPS training sets (r = 0.88–0.94). Significantly fewer data quality issues were encountered using the built-in web camera. Conclusions: Human scoring of a VPC decisional task using a built-in laptop web camera correlated strongly with automated scoring of the same task using a standard high frame rate eye tracker camera.While this method is not suitable for eye tracking paradigms requiring the collection and analysis of fine-grained metrics, such as fixation points, built-in web cameras are a standard feature of most smart devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, smart phones) and can be effectively employed to track eye movements on decisional tasks with high accuracy and minimal cost. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5487587/ /pubmed/28701915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00370 Text en Copyright © 2017 Bott, Lange, Rentz, Buffalo, Clopton and Zola. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bott, Nicholas T.
Lange, Alex
Rentz, Dorene
Buffalo, Elizabeth
Clopton, Paul
Zola, Stuart
Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title_full Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title_fullStr Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title_full_unstemmed Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title_short Web Camera Based Eye Tracking to Assess Visual Memory on a Visual Paired Comparison Task
title_sort web camera based eye tracking to assess visual memory on a visual paired comparison task
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00370
work_keys_str_mv AT bottnicholast webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask
AT langealex webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask
AT rentzdorene webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask
AT buffaloelizabeth webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask
AT cloptonpaul webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask
AT zolastuart webcamerabasedeyetrackingtoassessvisualmemoryonavisualpairedcomparisontask