Cargando…
A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062 |
_version_ | 1783246494846943232 |
---|---|
author | Waris, Otto Soveri, Anna Ahti, Miikka Hoffing, Russell C. Ventus, Daniel Jaeggi, Susanne M. Seitz, Aaron R. Laine, Matti |
author_facet | Waris, Otto Soveri, Anna Ahti, Miikka Hoffing, Russell C. Ventus, Daniel Jaeggi, Susanne M. Seitz, Aaron R. Laine, Matti |
author_sort | Waris, Otto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and n-back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults (n = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except n-back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The n-back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the n-back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5487690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54876902017-07-12 A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data Waris, Otto Soveri, Anna Ahti, Miikka Hoffing, Russell C. Ventus, Daniel Jaeggi, Susanne M. Seitz, Aaron R. Laine, Matti Front Psychol Psychology Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and n-back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults (n = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except n-back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The n-back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the n-back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5487690/ /pubmed/28701976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062 Text en Copyright © 2017 Waris, Soveri, Ahti, Hoffing, Ventus, Jaeggi, Seitz and Laine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Waris, Otto Soveri, Anna Ahti, Miikka Hoffing, Russell C. Ventus, Daniel Jaeggi, Susanne M. Seitz, Aaron R. Laine, Matti A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title | A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title_full | A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title_fullStr | A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title_full_unstemmed | A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title_short | A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data |
title_sort | latent factor analysis of working memory measures using large-scale data |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warisotto alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT soverianna alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT ahtimiikka alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT hoffingrussellc alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT ventusdaniel alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT jaeggisusannem alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT seitzaaronr alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT lainematti alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT warisotto latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT soverianna latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT ahtimiikka latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT hoffingrussellc latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT ventusdaniel latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT jaeggisusannem latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT seitzaaronr latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata AT lainematti latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata |