Cargando…

A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data

Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waris, Otto, Soveri, Anna, Ahti, Miikka, Hoffing, Russell C., Ventus, Daniel, Jaeggi, Susanne M., Seitz, Aaron R., Laine, Matti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062
_version_ 1783246494846943232
author Waris, Otto
Soveri, Anna
Ahti, Miikka
Hoffing, Russell C.
Ventus, Daniel
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
Laine, Matti
author_facet Waris, Otto
Soveri, Anna
Ahti, Miikka
Hoffing, Russell C.
Ventus, Daniel
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
Laine, Matti
author_sort Waris, Otto
collection PubMed
description Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and n-back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults (n = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except n-back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The n-back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the n-back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54876902017-07-12 A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data Waris, Otto Soveri, Anna Ahti, Miikka Hoffing, Russell C. Ventus, Daniel Jaeggi, Susanne M. Seitz, Aaron R. Laine, Matti Front Psychol Psychology Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and n-back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults (n = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except n-back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The n-back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the n-back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5487690/ /pubmed/28701976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062 Text en Copyright © 2017 Waris, Soveri, Ahti, Hoffing, Ventus, Jaeggi, Seitz and Laine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Waris, Otto
Soveri, Anna
Ahti, Miikka
Hoffing, Russell C.
Ventus, Daniel
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Seitz, Aaron R.
Laine, Matti
A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title_full A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title_fullStr A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title_full_unstemmed A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title_short A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
title_sort latent factor analysis of working memory measures using large-scale data
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062
work_keys_str_mv AT warisotto alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT soverianna alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT ahtimiikka alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT hoffingrussellc alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT ventusdaniel alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT jaeggisusannem alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT seitzaaronr alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT lainematti alatentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT warisotto latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT soverianna latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT ahtimiikka latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT hoffingrussellc latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT ventusdaniel latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT jaeggisusannem latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT seitzaaronr latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata
AT lainematti latentfactoranalysisofworkingmemorymeasuresusinglargescaledata