Cargando…

Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival

PURPOSE: In contrast to other countries, the Dutch breast cancer guideline does not recommend re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in invasive tumor and does recommend whole-breast irradiation including boost. We investigated whether omitting re-excision as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Elvira L., Siesling, Sabine, Baaijens, Margreet H.A., Verhoef, Cornelis, Jager, Agnes, Voogd, Adri C., Koppert, Linetta B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6
_version_ 1783246496098942976
author Vos, Elvira L.
Siesling, Sabine
Baaijens, Margreet H.A.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Jager, Agnes
Voogd, Adri C.
Koppert, Linetta B.
author_facet Vos, Elvira L.
Siesling, Sabine
Baaijens, Margreet H.A.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Jager, Agnes
Voogd, Adri C.
Koppert, Linetta B.
author_sort Vos, Elvira L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In contrast to other countries, the Dutch breast cancer guideline does not recommend re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in invasive tumor and does recommend whole-breast irradiation including boost. We investigated whether omitting re-excision as compared to performing re-excision affects prognosis with a retrospective population-based cohort study. METHODS: The total cohort included 32,119 women with primary BCS for T1–T3 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 from the nationwide Netherlands cancer registry. The subcohort included 10,433 patients in whom the resection margins were registered. Outcome measures were 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate. RESULTS: In the total cohort, 25,878 (80.6%) did not have re-excision, 2368 (7.4%) had re-excision by BCS, and 3873 (12.1%) had re-excision by mastectomy. Five-year IBTR rates were 2.1, 2.8, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.001). In the subcohort, 7820 (75.0%) had negative margins without re-excision, 492 (4.7%) had focally positive margins without re-excision, 586 (5.6%) had focally positive margins and underwent re-excision, and 1535 (14.7%) had extensively positive margins and underwent re-excision. Five-year IBTR rate was 2.3, 2.9, 1.1, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.099). Compared to omitting re-excision, performing re-excision for focally positive margins was associated with lower risk of IBTR (adjusted HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.82), but not with DFS (adjusted HR 0.83 95% CI 0.59–1.17) nor with OS (adjusted HR 1.17 95% CI 0.87–1.59). CONCLUSION: Omitting re-excision in breast cancer patients for focally positive margins after BCS does not impair DFS and OS, provided that whole-breast irradiation including boost is given. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5487695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54876952017-07-03 Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival Vos, Elvira L. Siesling, Sabine Baaijens, Margreet H.A. Verhoef, Cornelis Jager, Agnes Voogd, Adri C. Koppert, Linetta B. Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: In contrast to other countries, the Dutch breast cancer guideline does not recommend re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in invasive tumor and does recommend whole-breast irradiation including boost. We investigated whether omitting re-excision as compared to performing re-excision affects prognosis with a retrospective population-based cohort study. METHODS: The total cohort included 32,119 women with primary BCS for T1–T3 breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2008 from the nationwide Netherlands cancer registry. The subcohort included 10,433 patients in whom the resection margins were registered. Outcome measures were 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate. RESULTS: In the total cohort, 25,878 (80.6%) did not have re-excision, 2368 (7.4%) had re-excision by BCS, and 3873 (12.1%) had re-excision by mastectomy. Five-year IBTR rates were 2.1, 2.8, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.001). In the subcohort, 7820 (75.0%) had negative margins without re-excision, 492 (4.7%) had focally positive margins without re-excision, 586 (5.6%) had focally positive margins and underwent re-excision, and 1535 (14.7%) had extensively positive margins and underwent re-excision. Five-year IBTR rate was 2.3, 2.9, 1.1, and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.099). Compared to omitting re-excision, performing re-excision for focally positive margins was associated with lower risk of IBTR (adjusted HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.82), but not with DFS (adjusted HR 0.83 95% CI 0.59–1.17) nor with OS (adjusted HR 1.17 95% CI 0.87–1.59). CONCLUSION: Omitting re-excision in breast cancer patients for focally positive margins after BCS does not impair DFS and OS, provided that whole-breast irradiation including boost is given. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-04-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5487695/ /pubmed/28389735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Vos, Elvira L.
Siesling, Sabine
Baaijens, Margreet H.A.
Verhoef, Cornelis
Jager, Agnes
Voogd, Adri C.
Koppert, Linetta B.
Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title_full Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title_fullStr Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title_full_unstemmed Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title_short Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
title_sort omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4232-6
work_keys_str_mv AT voselviral omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT sieslingsabine omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT baaijensmargreetha omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT verhoefcornelis omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT jageragnes omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT voogdadric omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival
AT koppertlinettab omittingreexcisionforfocallypositivemarginsafterbreastconservingsurgerydoesnotimpairdiseasefreeandoverallsurvival