Cargando…
An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multicenter prospective clinical study was to evaluate anodized tapered implants with a conical connection and integrated platform shifting placed in the anterior and premolar maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled patients requiring single-tooth restorations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27864641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2003-0 |
_version_ | 1783246526613553152 |
---|---|
author | Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Pozzi, Alessandro Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Nikolaus Behneke, Alexandra Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Gottesman, Edward Colic, Snjezana |
author_facet | Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Pozzi, Alessandro Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Nikolaus Behneke, Alexandra Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Gottesman, Edward Colic, Snjezana |
author_sort | Fügl, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multicenter prospective clinical study was to evaluate anodized tapered implants with a conical connection and integrated platform shifting placed in the anterior and premolar maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled patients requiring single-tooth restorations in healed sites of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth. All implants were immediately temporized. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at implant insertion, 6 months, and 1 year. Outcome measures included bone remodeling, cumulative survival rate (CSR), success rate, soft-tissue health and esthetics, and patient satisfaction. Bone remodeling and pink esthetic score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CSR was calculated using life table analysis. Other soft-tissue outcomes were analyzed using sign tests. RESULTS: Out of 97 enrolled patients (102 implants), 87 patients (91 implants) completed the 1-year visit. Marginal bone remodeling was −0.85 ± 1.36 mm. After the expected initial bone loss, a mean bone gain of 0.11 ± 1.05 mm was observed between 6 months and 1 year. The CSR was 99.0%, and the cumulative success rate was 97.0%. Partial or full papilla was observed at 30.8% of sites at baseline, 87.2% at 6 months, and 90.5% at 1 year. Soft-tissue response, esthetics, and patient satisfaction all improved during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Bone gain was observed following the expected initial bone loss, and soft-tissue outcomes improved suggesting favorable tissue response using anodized tapered conical connection implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rapid stabilization of bone remodeling and robust papilla regeneration indicate favorable tissue healing promoted by the conical connection, platform-shift design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02175550 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5487825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54878252017-07-03 An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Pozzi, Alessandro Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Nikolaus Behneke, Alexandra Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Gottesman, Edward Colic, Snjezana Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multicenter prospective clinical study was to evaluate anodized tapered implants with a conical connection and integrated platform shifting placed in the anterior and premolar maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled patients requiring single-tooth restorations in healed sites of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth. All implants were immediately temporized. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at implant insertion, 6 months, and 1 year. Outcome measures included bone remodeling, cumulative survival rate (CSR), success rate, soft-tissue health and esthetics, and patient satisfaction. Bone remodeling and pink esthetic score were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. CSR was calculated using life table analysis. Other soft-tissue outcomes were analyzed using sign tests. RESULTS: Out of 97 enrolled patients (102 implants), 87 patients (91 implants) completed the 1-year visit. Marginal bone remodeling was −0.85 ± 1.36 mm. After the expected initial bone loss, a mean bone gain of 0.11 ± 1.05 mm was observed between 6 months and 1 year. The CSR was 99.0%, and the cumulative success rate was 97.0%. Partial or full papilla was observed at 30.8% of sites at baseline, 87.2% at 6 months, and 90.5% at 1 year. Soft-tissue response, esthetics, and patient satisfaction all improved during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Bone gain was observed following the expected initial bone loss, and soft-tissue outcomes improved suggesting favorable tissue response using anodized tapered conical connection implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rapid stabilization of bone remodeling and robust papilla regeneration indicate favorable tissue healing promoted by the conical connection, platform-shift design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02175550 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5487825/ /pubmed/27864641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2003-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fügl, Alexander Zechner, Werner Pozzi, Alessandro Heydecke, Guido Mirzakhanian, Christine Behneke, Nikolaus Behneke, Alexandra Baer, Russell A. Nölken, Robert Gottesman, Edward Colic, Snjezana An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title | An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title_full | An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title_fullStr | An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title_full_unstemmed | An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title_short | An open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
title_sort | open prospective single cohort multicenter study evaluating the novel, tapered, conical connection implants supporting single crowns in the anterior and premolar maxilla: interim 1-year results |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27864641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2003-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuglalexander anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT zechnerwerner anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT pozzialessandro anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT heydeckeguido anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT mirzakhanianchristine anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT behnekenikolaus anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT behnekealexandra anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT baerrussella anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT nolkenrobert anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT gottesmanedward anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT colicsnjezana anopenprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT fuglalexander openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT zechnerwerner openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT pozzialessandro openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT heydeckeguido openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT mirzakhanianchristine openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT behnekenikolaus openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT behnekealexandra openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT baerrussella openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT nolkenrobert openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT gottesmanedward openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults AT colicsnjezana openprospectivesinglecohortmulticenterstudyevaluatingthenoveltaperedconicalconnectionimplantssupportingsinglecrownsintheanteriorandpremolarmaxillainterim1yearresults |