Cargando…

The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants

Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improvi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faller, Matthew, Kohler, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019
_version_ 1783246589278552064
author Faller, Matthew
Kohler, Tobias
author_facet Faller, Matthew
Kohler, Tobias
author_sort Faller, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improving success rates. Infection and mechanical failure are the most common reasons for implant revision in the past. Since the development of more reliable devices, bacterial biofilms are coming to the forefront of discussion as causes of required revision. Biofilms are problematic as they are ubiquitous and exceedingly difficult to prevent or treat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5488090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54880902017-06-30 The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants Faller, Matthew Kohler, Tobias Microorganisms Review Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improving success rates. Infection and mechanical failure are the most common reasons for implant revision in the past. Since the development of more reliable devices, bacterial biofilms are coming to the forefront of discussion as causes of required revision. Biofilms are problematic as they are ubiquitous and exceedingly difficult to prevent or treat. MDPI 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5488090/ /pubmed/28420206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Faller, Matthew
Kohler, Tobias
The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title_full The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title_fullStr The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title_full_unstemmed The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title_short The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
title_sort status of biofilms in penile implants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019
work_keys_str_mv AT fallermatthew thestatusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants
AT kohlertobias thestatusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants
AT fallermatthew statusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants
AT kohlertobias statusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants