Cargando…
The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants
Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improvi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019 |
_version_ | 1783246589278552064 |
---|---|
author | Faller, Matthew Kohler, Tobias |
author_facet | Faller, Matthew Kohler, Tobias |
author_sort | Faller, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improving success rates. Infection and mechanical failure are the most common reasons for implant revision in the past. Since the development of more reliable devices, bacterial biofilms are coming to the forefront of discussion as causes of required revision. Biofilms are problematic as they are ubiquitous and exceedingly difficult to prevent or treat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5488090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54880902017-06-30 The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants Faller, Matthew Kohler, Tobias Microorganisms Review Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improving success rates. Infection and mechanical failure are the most common reasons for implant revision in the past. Since the development of more reliable devices, bacterial biofilms are coming to the forefront of discussion as causes of required revision. Biofilms are problematic as they are ubiquitous and exceedingly difficult to prevent or treat. MDPI 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5488090/ /pubmed/28420206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Faller, Matthew Kohler, Tobias The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title | The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title_full | The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title_fullStr | The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title_short | The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants |
title_sort | status of biofilms in penile implants |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fallermatthew thestatusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants AT kohlertobias thestatusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants AT fallermatthew statusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants AT kohlertobias statusofbiofilmsinpenileimplants |