Cargando…

Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues are widely used for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for switching between LHRH analogues. It has been reported that there may be clinical benefits for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Visapää, Harri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-017-0040-8
_version_ 1783246594199519232
author Visapää, Harri
author_facet Visapää, Harri
author_sort Visapää, Harri
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues are widely used for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for switching between LHRH analogues. It has been reported that there may be clinical benefits for patients switching between different formulations of LHRH agonists, as well as from an LHRH agonist to LHRH antagonist, but there are no published data on switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. In this paper, we summarize the clinical notes of 10 patients with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer who switched from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. METHODS: Patients with T3N0M0–T4N1M1 prostate cancer experiencing injection site reactions, such as pain and swelling, with monthly degarelix (Firmagon(®)) subcutaneous injections were switched to the 3-monthly leuprorelin acetate implant (Leuprorelin Sandoz(®)) subcutaneous injections. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 75 years (SD 8.3; range 59–85) and Gleason scores ranged from 7 to 9. The mean [±standard deviation (SD)] duration of degarelix treatment was 5 ± 3.7 months (range 2–13). After switching, prostate serum antigen levels were comparable or reduced from those measured prior to switching, showing that efficacy was not compromised. Throughout the course of treatment, no patients reported injection site reactions. Patients reported increased satisfaction with the leuprorelin acetate implant versus degarelix, mainly because of a lack of injection site reactions and reduced frequency of injection. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the clinical experience and potential cost implications of switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. These data are consistent with other experiences of switching between LHRH analogues in terms of efficacy, safety, and potential cost savings, and provide preliminary evidence that the switch from an LHRH antagonist to an agonist is safe and equally efficacious.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5488110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54881102017-07-03 Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Visapää, Harri Oncol Ther Case Series INTRODUCTION: Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues are widely used for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer. However, there are currently no clinical guidelines for switching between LHRH analogues. It has been reported that there may be clinical benefits for patients switching between different formulations of LHRH agonists, as well as from an LHRH agonist to LHRH antagonist, but there are no published data on switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. In this paper, we summarize the clinical notes of 10 patients with hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer who switched from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. METHODS: Patients with T3N0M0–T4N1M1 prostate cancer experiencing injection site reactions, such as pain and swelling, with monthly degarelix (Firmagon(®)) subcutaneous injections were switched to the 3-monthly leuprorelin acetate implant (Leuprorelin Sandoz(®)) subcutaneous injections. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 75 years (SD 8.3; range 59–85) and Gleason scores ranged from 7 to 9. The mean [±standard deviation (SD)] duration of degarelix treatment was 5 ± 3.7 months (range 2–13). After switching, prostate serum antigen levels were comparable or reduced from those measured prior to switching, showing that efficacy was not compromised. Throughout the course of treatment, no patients reported injection site reactions. Patients reported increased satisfaction with the leuprorelin acetate implant versus degarelix, mainly because of a lack of injection site reactions and reduced frequency of injection. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the clinical experience and potential cost implications of switching from an LHRH antagonist to an LHRH agonist. These data are consistent with other experiences of switching between LHRH analogues in terms of efficacy, safety, and potential cost savings, and provide preliminary evidence that the switch from an LHRH antagonist to an agonist is safe and equally efficacious. Springer Healthcare 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5488110/ /pubmed/28680962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-017-0040-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Series
Visapää, Harri
Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title_full Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title_short Switching from an LHRH Antagonist to an LHRH Agonist: A Case Report of 10 Finnish Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
title_sort switching from an lhrh antagonist to an lhrh agonist: a case report of 10 finnish patients with advanced prostate cancer
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-017-0040-8
work_keys_str_mv AT visapaaharri switchingfromanlhrhantagonisttoanlhrhagonistacasereportof10finnishpatientswithadvancedprostatecancer