Cargando…
The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for trans...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8 |
_version_ | 1783246594480537600 |
---|---|
author | Schey, Steve Montero, Luis Felipe Casado Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe Gibson, Craig J. Dhanasiri, Sujith |
author_facet | Schey, Steve Montero, Luis Felipe Casado Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe Gibson, Craig J. Dhanasiri, Sujith |
author_sort | Schey, Steve |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). METHODS: We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5 years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. RESULTS: Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1 months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were €40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of €867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to €3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (€813) compared with bortezomib (€1173) and thalidomide (€1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient’s treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. FUNDING: Celgene Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5488111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54881112017-07-03 The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 Schey, Steve Montero, Luis Felipe Casado Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe Gibson, Craig J. Dhanasiri, Sujith Oncol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). METHODS: We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5 years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. RESULTS: Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1 months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were €40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of €867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to €3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (€813) compared with bortezomib (€1173) and thalidomide (€1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient’s treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. FUNDING: Celgene Ltd. Springer Healthcare 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5488111/ /pubmed/28680953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schey, Steve Montero, Luis Felipe Casado Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe Gibson, Craig J. Dhanasiri, Sujith The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title | The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title_full | The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title_fullStr | The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title_short | The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 |
title_sort | cost impact of lenalidomide for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the eu5 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scheysteve thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT monteroluisfelipecasado thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT stengeltosettichloe thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT gibsoncraigj thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT dhanasirisujith thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT scheysteve costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT monteroluisfelipecasado costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT stengeltosettichloe costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT gibsoncraigj costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 AT dhanasirisujith costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5 |