Cargando…

The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5

INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schey, Steve, Montero, Luis Felipe Casado, Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe, Gibson, Craig J., Dhanasiri, Sujith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8
_version_ 1783246594480537600
author Schey, Steve
Montero, Luis Felipe Casado
Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe
Gibson, Craig J.
Dhanasiri, Sujith
author_facet Schey, Steve
Montero, Luis Felipe Casado
Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe
Gibson, Craig J.
Dhanasiri, Sujith
author_sort Schey, Steve
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). METHODS: We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5 years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. RESULTS: Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1 months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were €40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of €867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to €3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (€813) compared with bortezomib (€1173) and thalidomide (€1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient’s treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. FUNDING: Celgene Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5488111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54881112017-07-03 The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5 Schey, Steve Montero, Luis Felipe Casado Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe Gibson, Craig J. Dhanasiri, Sujith Oncol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). METHODS: We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5 years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. RESULTS: Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1 months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were €40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of €867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to €3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (€813) compared with bortezomib (€1173) and thalidomide (€1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient’s treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. FUNDING: Celgene Ltd. Springer Healthcare 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5488111/ /pubmed/28680953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schey, Steve
Montero, Luis Felipe Casado
Stengel-Tosetti, Chloe
Gibson, Craig J.
Dhanasiri, Sujith
The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title_full The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title_fullStr The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title_full_unstemmed The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title_short The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
title_sort cost impact of lenalidomide for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the eu5
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8
work_keys_str_mv AT scheysteve thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT monteroluisfelipecasado thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT stengeltosettichloe thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT gibsoncraigj thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT dhanasirisujith thecostimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT scheysteve costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT monteroluisfelipecasado costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT stengeltosettichloe costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT gibsoncraigj costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5
AT dhanasirisujith costimpactoflenalidomidefornewlydiagnosedmultiplemyelomaintheeu5