Cargando…

Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure. Abiraterone acetate fine par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldwater, Ronald, Hussaini, Azra, Bosch, Bill, Nemeth, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2
_version_ 1783246602168696832
author Goldwater, Ronald
Hussaini, Azra
Bosch, Bill
Nemeth, Paul
author_facet Goldwater, Ronald
Hussaini, Azra
Bosch, Bill
Nemeth, Paul
author_sort Goldwater, Ronald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure. Abiraterone acetate fine particle (AAFP) is a proprietary formulation (using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™) designed to increase the oral bioavailability of abiraterone acetate. Here, we report on two phase I studies in healthy male subjects aged 18–50 years. METHODS: In Study 101, 20 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 100, 200, or 400 mg or OAA 1000 mg taken orally under fasting conditions. Results suggested that AAFP 500 mg would be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in the fasted state. To confirm the bioequivalence hypothesis and to further expand the AAFP dose range, in Study 102, 36 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 125, 500, or 625 mg or OAA 1000 mg. Both studies included a 7-day washout period between administrations. RESULTS: Dose-dependent increases in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve and maximum plasma concentration with AAFP were observed in both studies. The AAFP 500-mg bioavailability relative to OAA 1000 mg measured by the geometric mean ratio for area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration was 93.4% (90% confidence interval 85.3–102.4), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity was 91.0% (90% confidence interval 83.3–99.4), and maximum plasma concentration was 99.8% (90% confidence interval 86.3–115.5). Dose proportionality was seen across all AAFP dose levels (100–625 mg). Abiraterone acetate fine particle was found to be safe and well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSION: Abiraterone acetate fine particle 500 mg was demonstrated to be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in healthy volunteers under fasted conditions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5488144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54881442017-07-03 Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies Goldwater, Ronald Hussaini, Azra Bosch, Bill Nemeth, Paul Clin Pharmacokinet Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure. Abiraterone acetate fine particle (AAFP) is a proprietary formulation (using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™) designed to increase the oral bioavailability of abiraterone acetate. Here, we report on two phase I studies in healthy male subjects aged 18–50 years. METHODS: In Study 101, 20 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 100, 200, or 400 mg or OAA 1000 mg taken orally under fasting conditions. Results suggested that AAFP 500 mg would be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in the fasted state. To confirm the bioequivalence hypothesis and to further expand the AAFP dose range, in Study 102, 36 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 125, 500, or 625 mg or OAA 1000 mg. Both studies included a 7-day washout period between administrations. RESULTS: Dose-dependent increases in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve and maximum plasma concentration with AAFP were observed in both studies. The AAFP 500-mg bioavailability relative to OAA 1000 mg measured by the geometric mean ratio for area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration was 93.4% (90% confidence interval 85.3–102.4), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity was 91.0% (90% confidence interval 83.3–99.4), and maximum plasma concentration was 99.8% (90% confidence interval 86.3–115.5). Dose proportionality was seen across all AAFP dose levels (100–625 mg). Abiraterone acetate fine particle was found to be safe and well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSION: Abiraterone acetate fine particle 500 mg was demonstrated to be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in healthy volunteers under fasted conditions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-04-19 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5488144/ /pubmed/28425029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Goldwater, Ronald
Hussaini, Azra
Bosch, Bill
Nemeth, Paul
Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title_full Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title_fullStr Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title_short Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
title_sort comparison of a novel formulation of abiraterone acetate vs. the originator formulation in healthy male subjects: two randomized, open-label, crossover studies
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2
work_keys_str_mv AT goldwaterronald comparisonofanovelformulationofabirateroneacetatevstheoriginatorformulationinhealthymalesubjectstworandomizedopenlabelcrossoverstudies
AT hussainiazra comparisonofanovelformulationofabirateroneacetatevstheoriginatorformulationinhealthymalesubjectstworandomizedopenlabelcrossoverstudies
AT boschbill comparisonofanovelformulationofabirateroneacetatevstheoriginatorformulationinhealthymalesubjectstworandomizedopenlabelcrossoverstudies
AT nemethpaul comparisonofanovelformulationofabirateroneacetatevstheoriginatorformulationinhealthymalesubjectstworandomizedopenlabelcrossoverstudies