Cargando…
Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x |
_version_ | 1783246633726640128 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Joo Yong Jeh, Seong Uk Kim, Man Deuk Kang, Dong Hyuk Kwon, Jong Kyou Ham, Won Sik Choi, Young Deuk Cho, Kang Su |
author_facet | Lee, Joo Yong Jeh, Seong Uk Kim, Man Deuk Kang, Dong Hyuk Kwon, Jong Kyou Ham, Won Sik Choi, Young Deuk Cho, Kang Su |
author_sort | Lee, Joo Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of different PCNL procedures, including total tubeless, tubeless with stent, small-bore tube, and large-bore tube PCNLs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE™ databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published before December 30, 2013. One researcher examined all titles and abstracts found by the searches. Two investigators independently evaluated the full-text articles to determine whether those met the inclusion criteria. Qualities of included studies were rated with Cochrane’s risk-of-bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final syntheses including pairwise and network meta-analyses. Operation time, pain scores, and transfusion rates were not significantly different between PCNL procedures. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless PCNL may be superior to standard PCNL (mean difference [MD] 0.65, 95% CI 0.14–1.13) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD -1.14, 95% CI -1.65–-0.62), and small-bore PCNL may be superior to tubeless PCNL with stent (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.27–2.26). Network meta-analyses also showed that for length of hospital stay, total tubeless (MD 1.33, 95% CI 0.23–2.43) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.19–1.79) may be superior to standard PCNL. In rank probability tests, small-bore tube and total tubeless PCNLs were superior for operation time, pain scores, and hemoglobin changes. CONCLUSIONS: For hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and small-bore PCNLs may be superior to other methods. For hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5488341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54883412017-07-03 Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials Lee, Joo Yong Jeh, Seong Uk Kim, Man Deuk Kang, Dong Hyuk Kwon, Jong Kyou Ham, Won Sik Choi, Young Deuk Cho, Kang Su BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of different PCNL procedures, including total tubeless, tubeless with stent, small-bore tube, and large-bore tube PCNLs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE™ databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published before December 30, 2013. One researcher examined all titles and abstracts found by the searches. Two investigators independently evaluated the full-text articles to determine whether those met the inclusion criteria. Qualities of included studies were rated with Cochrane’s risk-of-bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final syntheses including pairwise and network meta-analyses. Operation time, pain scores, and transfusion rates were not significantly different between PCNL procedures. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless PCNL may be superior to standard PCNL (mean difference [MD] 0.65, 95% CI 0.14–1.13) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD -1.14, 95% CI -1.65–-0.62), and small-bore PCNL may be superior to tubeless PCNL with stent (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.27–2.26). Network meta-analyses also showed that for length of hospital stay, total tubeless (MD 1.33, 95% CI 0.23–2.43) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.19–1.79) may be superior to standard PCNL. In rank probability tests, small-bore tube and total tubeless PCNLs were superior for operation time, pain scores, and hemoglobin changes. CONCLUSIONS: For hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and small-bore PCNLs may be superior to other methods. For hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures. BioMed Central 2017-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5488341/ /pubmed/28655317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Joo Yong Jeh, Seong Uk Kim, Man Deuk Kang, Dong Hyuk Kwon, Jong Kyou Ham, Won Sik Choi, Young Deuk Cho, Kang Su Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejooyong intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT jehseonguk intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kimmandeuk intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kangdonghyuk intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT kwonjongkyou intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT hamwonsik intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT choiyoungdeuk intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials AT chokangsu intraoperativeandpostoperativefeasibilityandsafetyoftotaltubelesstubelesssmallboretubeandstandardpercutaneousnephrolithotomyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof16randomizedcontrolledtrials |