Cargando…
Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Prec...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017 |
_version_ | 1783246743436001280 |
---|---|
author | Marlow, Laura A.V. Chorley, Amanda J. Haddrell, Jessica Ferrer, Rebecca Waller, Jo |
author_facet | Marlow, Laura A.V. Chorley, Amanda J. Haddrell, Jessica Ferrer, Rebecca Waller, Jo |
author_sort | Marlow, Laura A.V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM). METHODS: Home-based computer-assisted interviews were carried out with 3113 screening-eligible women in Britain. Survey items assessed self-reported screening uptake and intention to attend in future. Responses to these items were used to classify women into one of five different types of non-participants. RESULTS: Of 793 non-participants, 28% were unaware of screening, 15% had decided not to attend and 51% were intending to have screening but were currently overdue. Younger women were more likely to be unaware of screening or to intend to be screened, while older women were more likely to have decided not to be screened. Women from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be unaware of screening than white women. Being in a lower social grade was associated with increased odds of all three types of non-participation. CONCLUSION: The majority of cervical cancer screening non-participants are not making an active decision not to attend but rather are either unaware or unable to act. There are clear sociodemographic differences between non-participant types, which could be used to identify where tailored interventions may be best targeted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5489076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54890762017-07-12 Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women Marlow, Laura A.V. Chorley, Amanda J. Haddrell, Jessica Ferrer, Rebecca Waller, Jo Eur J Cancer Original Research BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM). METHODS: Home-based computer-assisted interviews were carried out with 3113 screening-eligible women in Britain. Survey items assessed self-reported screening uptake and intention to attend in future. Responses to these items were used to classify women into one of five different types of non-participants. RESULTS: Of 793 non-participants, 28% were unaware of screening, 15% had decided not to attend and 51% were intending to have screening but were currently overdue. Younger women were more likely to be unaware of screening or to intend to be screened, while older women were more likely to have decided not to be screened. Women from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be unaware of screening than white women. Being in a lower social grade was associated with increased odds of all three types of non-participation. CONCLUSION: The majority of cervical cancer screening non-participants are not making an active decision not to attend but rather are either unaware or unable to act. There are clear sociodemographic differences between non-participant types, which could be used to identify where tailored interventions may be best targeted. Elsevier Science Ltd 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5489076/ /pubmed/28535495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Marlow, Laura A.V. Chorley, Amanda J. Haddrell, Jessica Ferrer, Rebecca Waller, Jo Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title | Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title_full | Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title_fullStr | Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title_short | Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women |
title_sort | understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: data from a national sample of british women |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marlowlauraav understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen AT chorleyamandaj understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen AT haddrelljessica understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen AT ferrerrebecca understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen AT wallerjo understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen |