Cargando…

Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women

BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Prec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marlow, Laura A.V., Chorley, Amanda J., Haddrell, Jessica, Ferrer, Rebecca, Waller, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017
_version_ 1783246743436001280
author Marlow, Laura A.V.
Chorley, Amanda J.
Haddrell, Jessica
Ferrer, Rebecca
Waller, Jo
author_facet Marlow, Laura A.V.
Chorley, Amanda J.
Haddrell, Jessica
Ferrer, Rebecca
Waller, Jo
author_sort Marlow, Laura A.V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM). METHODS: Home-based computer-assisted interviews were carried out with 3113 screening-eligible women in Britain. Survey items assessed self-reported screening uptake and intention to attend in future. Responses to these items were used to classify women into one of five different types of non-participants. RESULTS: Of 793 non-participants, 28% were unaware of screening, 15% had decided not to attend and 51% were intending to have screening but were currently overdue. Younger women were more likely to be unaware of screening or to intend to be screened, while older women were more likely to have decided not to be screened. Women from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be unaware of screening than white women. Being in a lower social grade was associated with increased odds of all three types of non-participation. CONCLUSION: The majority of cervical cancer screening non-participants are not making an active decision not to attend but rather are either unaware or unable to act. There are clear sociodemographic differences between non-participant types, which could be used to identify where tailored interventions may be best targeted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5489076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54890762017-07-12 Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women Marlow, Laura A.V. Chorley, Amanda J. Haddrell, Jessica Ferrer, Rebecca Waller, Jo Eur J Cancer Original Research BACKGROUND: Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the United Kingdom (UK) is falling year on year, and a more sophisticated understanding of non-participation may help design interventions to reverse this trend. This study ascertained the prevalence of different non-participant types using the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM). METHODS: Home-based computer-assisted interviews were carried out with 3113 screening-eligible women in Britain. Survey items assessed self-reported screening uptake and intention to attend in future. Responses to these items were used to classify women into one of five different types of non-participants. RESULTS: Of 793 non-participants, 28% were unaware of screening, 15% had decided not to attend and 51% were intending to have screening but were currently overdue. Younger women were more likely to be unaware of screening or to intend to be screened, while older women were more likely to have decided not to be screened. Women from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be unaware of screening than white women. Being in a lower social grade was associated with increased odds of all three types of non-participation. CONCLUSION: The majority of cervical cancer screening non-participants are not making an active decision not to attend but rather are either unaware or unable to act. There are clear sociodemographic differences between non-participant types, which could be used to identify where tailored interventions may be best targeted. Elsevier Science Ltd 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5489076/ /pubmed/28535495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Marlow, Laura A.V.
Chorley, Amanda J.
Haddrell, Jessica
Ferrer, Rebecca
Waller, Jo
Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title_full Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title_fullStr Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title_short Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women
title_sort understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: data from a national sample of british women
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.017
work_keys_str_mv AT marlowlauraav understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen
AT chorleyamandaj understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen
AT haddrelljessica understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen
AT ferrerrebecca understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen
AT wallerjo understandingtheheterogeneityofcervicalcancerscreeningnonparticipantsdatafromanationalsampleofbritishwomen