Cargando…
Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of unprotected left main (UPLM) with either PCI or CABG remains uncertain. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of PCI versus CABG in patients with UPLM disease. METHODS: Search of BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, mRCT, PubMed,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179060 |
_version_ | 1783246757348507648 |
---|---|
author | Testa, Luca Latib, Azeem Bollati, Mario Antonio Montone, Rocco Colombo, Antonio Crea, Filippo Bedogni, Francesco |
author_facet | Testa, Luca Latib, Azeem Bollati, Mario Antonio Montone, Rocco Colombo, Antonio Crea, Filippo Bedogni, Francesco |
author_sort | Testa, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of unprotected left main (UPLM) with either PCI or CABG remains uncertain. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of PCI versus CABG in patients with UPLM disease. METHODS: Search of BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, mRCT, PubMed, major cardiological congresses proceedings and references cross-check (updated November 2016). Outcomes were the rate of MACE [all cause death, MI, stroke], the rates of the individual components of MACE and the rate of target vessel revascularisation (TVR). RESULTS: We identified 6 Randomised Controlled Trials totalling 4717 patients allocated to PCI or CABG. At 1 year follow up, PCI and CABG were substantially equivalent with respect to the rates of MACE [PCI 8.5% vs CABG 8.9%, OR 1.02,(0.76–1.36), p = 0.9], death [PCI 5.4% vs CABG 6.6%, OR 0.81,(0.63–1.03),p = 0.08] and MI [PCI 3.4% vs CABG 4.3%, OR 0.80(0.59–1.07), p = 0.14]. Notably, PCI was associated with a significantly lower rate of stroke [PCI 0.6% vs CABG 1.8%, OR 0.36,(0.17–0.79), p = 0.01] and with a significantly higher rate of TVR [PCI 8.7% vs CABG 4.5%, OR 2.00(1.46–2.75), p<0.01]. At a median follow up of 5years, the rates of MACE were similar between the two strategies: PCI 14.6% vs CABG 13.8%, OR 1.02(0.76–1.38), p = 0.89. Likewise, the rates of death [PCI 8% and CABG 7.7%, OR 1(0.77–1.31), P = 0.9], MI [PCI 6.1% vs CABG 5%, OR 1.41(0.85–2.34), P = 0.19, I(2) 59%], and stroke [PCI 2% vs CABG 2.2%, OR 0.85(0.42–1.81), p = 0.65,] were similar while PCI was associated with a significantly higher rate of TVR [14.5% vs CABG 8.9%, OR 1.73(1.41–2.13), p<0.01]. CONCLUSION: In patients with UPLM disease, PCI and CABG are associated with similar rates of MACE and mortality at 1 year as well as after 5 years. Differences can be detected for individual end points at both short and long term FU. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5489169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54891692017-07-11 Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Testa, Luca Latib, Azeem Bollati, Mario Antonio Montone, Rocco Colombo, Antonio Crea, Filippo Bedogni, Francesco PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of unprotected left main (UPLM) with either PCI or CABG remains uncertain. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of PCI versus CABG in patients with UPLM disease. METHODS: Search of BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, mRCT, PubMed, major cardiological congresses proceedings and references cross-check (updated November 2016). Outcomes were the rate of MACE [all cause death, MI, stroke], the rates of the individual components of MACE and the rate of target vessel revascularisation (TVR). RESULTS: We identified 6 Randomised Controlled Trials totalling 4717 patients allocated to PCI or CABG. At 1 year follow up, PCI and CABG were substantially equivalent with respect to the rates of MACE [PCI 8.5% vs CABG 8.9%, OR 1.02,(0.76–1.36), p = 0.9], death [PCI 5.4% vs CABG 6.6%, OR 0.81,(0.63–1.03),p = 0.08] and MI [PCI 3.4% vs CABG 4.3%, OR 0.80(0.59–1.07), p = 0.14]. Notably, PCI was associated with a significantly lower rate of stroke [PCI 0.6% vs CABG 1.8%, OR 0.36,(0.17–0.79), p = 0.01] and with a significantly higher rate of TVR [PCI 8.7% vs CABG 4.5%, OR 2.00(1.46–2.75), p<0.01]. At a median follow up of 5years, the rates of MACE were similar between the two strategies: PCI 14.6% vs CABG 13.8%, OR 1.02(0.76–1.38), p = 0.89. Likewise, the rates of death [PCI 8% and CABG 7.7%, OR 1(0.77–1.31), P = 0.9], MI [PCI 6.1% vs CABG 5%, OR 1.41(0.85–2.34), P = 0.19, I(2) 59%], and stroke [PCI 2% vs CABG 2.2%, OR 0.85(0.42–1.81), p = 0.65,] were similar while PCI was associated with a significantly higher rate of TVR [14.5% vs CABG 8.9%, OR 1.73(1.41–2.13), p<0.01]. CONCLUSION: In patients with UPLM disease, PCI and CABG are associated with similar rates of MACE and mortality at 1 year as well as after 5 years. Differences can be detected for individual end points at both short and long term FU. Public Library of Science 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5489169/ /pubmed/28658308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179060 Text en © 2017 Testa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Testa, Luca Latib, Azeem Bollati, Mario Antonio Montone, Rocco Colombo, Antonio Crea, Filippo Bedogni, Francesco Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | Unprotected left main revascularization: Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | unprotected left main revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass. an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT testaluca unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT latibazeem unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT bollatimario unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT antoniomontonerocco unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT colomboantonio unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT creafilippo unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT bedognifrancesco unprotectedleftmainrevascularizationpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionversuscoronaryarterybypassanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |