Cargando…

More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays

Modern molecular diagnostic approaches in the diagnostic microbiological laboratory like real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have led to a considerable increase of diagnostic sensitivity. They usually outperform the diagnostic sensitivity of culture-based approaches. Culture-base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zautner, Andreas E., Groß, Uwe, Emele, Matthias F., Hagen, Ralf M., Frickmann, Hagen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01210
_version_ 1783246814863949824
author Zautner, Andreas E.
Groß, Uwe
Emele, Matthias F.
Hagen, Ralf M.
Frickmann, Hagen
author_facet Zautner, Andreas E.
Groß, Uwe
Emele, Matthias F.
Hagen, Ralf M.
Frickmann, Hagen
author_sort Zautner, Andreas E.
collection PubMed
description Modern molecular diagnostic approaches in the diagnostic microbiological laboratory like real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have led to a considerable increase of diagnostic sensitivity. They usually outperform the diagnostic sensitivity of culture-based approaches. Culture-based diagnostics were found to be insufficiently sensitive for the assessment of the composition of biofilms in chronic wounds and poorly standardized for screenings for enteric colonization with multi-drug resistant bacteria. However, the increased sensitivity of qPCR causes interpretative challenges regarding the attribution of etiological relevance to individual pathogen species in case of multiple detections of facultative pathogenic microorganisms in primarily non-sterile sample materials. This is particularly the case in high-endemicity settings, where continuous exposition to respective microorganisms leads to immunological adaptation and semi-resistance while considerable disease would result in case of exposition of a non-adapted population. While biofilms in chronic wounds show higher pathogenic potential in case of multi-species composition, detection of multiple pathogens in respiratory samples is much more difficult to interpret and asymptomatic enteric colonization with facultative pathogenic microorganisms is frequently observed in high endemicity settings. For respiratory samples and stool samples, cycle-threshold-value-based semi-quantitative interpretation of qPCR results has been suggested. Etiological relevance is assumed if cycle-threshold values are low, suggesting high pathogen loads. Although the procedure is challenged by lacking standardization and methodical issues, first evaluations have led to promising results. Future studies should aim at generally acceptable quantitative cut-off values to allow discrimination of asymptomatic colonization from clinically relevant infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5489565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54895652017-07-13 More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays Zautner, Andreas E. Groß, Uwe Emele, Matthias F. Hagen, Ralf M. Frickmann, Hagen Front Microbiol Microbiology Modern molecular diagnostic approaches in the diagnostic microbiological laboratory like real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have led to a considerable increase of diagnostic sensitivity. They usually outperform the diagnostic sensitivity of culture-based approaches. Culture-based diagnostics were found to be insufficiently sensitive for the assessment of the composition of biofilms in chronic wounds and poorly standardized for screenings for enteric colonization with multi-drug resistant bacteria. However, the increased sensitivity of qPCR causes interpretative challenges regarding the attribution of etiological relevance to individual pathogen species in case of multiple detections of facultative pathogenic microorganisms in primarily non-sterile sample materials. This is particularly the case in high-endemicity settings, where continuous exposition to respective microorganisms leads to immunological adaptation and semi-resistance while considerable disease would result in case of exposition of a non-adapted population. While biofilms in chronic wounds show higher pathogenic potential in case of multi-species composition, detection of multiple pathogens in respiratory samples is much more difficult to interpret and asymptomatic enteric colonization with facultative pathogenic microorganisms is frequently observed in high endemicity settings. For respiratory samples and stool samples, cycle-threshold-value-based semi-quantitative interpretation of qPCR results has been suggested. Etiological relevance is assumed if cycle-threshold values are low, suggesting high pathogen loads. Although the procedure is challenged by lacking standardization and methodical issues, first evaluations have led to promising results. Future studies should aim at generally acceptable quantitative cut-off values to allow discrimination of asymptomatic colonization from clinically relevant infection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5489565/ /pubmed/28706515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01210 Text en Copyright © 2017 Zautner, Groß, Emele, Hagen and Frickmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Zautner, Andreas E.
Groß, Uwe
Emele, Matthias F.
Hagen, Ralf M.
Frickmann, Hagen
More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title_full More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title_fullStr More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title_full_unstemmed More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title_short More Pathogenicity or Just More Pathogens?—On the Interpretation Problem of Multiple Pathogen Detections with Diagnostic Multiplex Assays
title_sort more pathogenicity or just more pathogens?—on the interpretation problem of multiple pathogen detections with diagnostic multiplex assays
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01210
work_keys_str_mv AT zautnerandrease morepathogenicityorjustmorepathogensontheinterpretationproblemofmultiplepathogendetectionswithdiagnosticmultiplexassays
AT großuwe morepathogenicityorjustmorepathogensontheinterpretationproblemofmultiplepathogendetectionswithdiagnosticmultiplexassays
AT emelematthiasf morepathogenicityorjustmorepathogensontheinterpretationproblemofmultiplepathogendetectionswithdiagnosticmultiplexassays
AT hagenralfm morepathogenicityorjustmorepathogensontheinterpretationproblemofmultiplepathogendetectionswithdiagnosticmultiplexassays
AT frickmannhagen morepathogenicityorjustmorepathogensontheinterpretationproblemofmultiplepathogendetectionswithdiagnosticmultiplexassays