Cargando…
A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology
Systematic reviews, pioneered in the clinical field, provide a transparent, methodologically rigorous and reproducible means of summarizing the available evidence on a precisely framed research question. Having matured to a well-established approach in many research fields, systematic reviews are re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28501917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3 |
_version_ | 1783246832042770432 |
---|---|
author | Hoffmann, Sebastian de Vries, Rob B. M. Stephens, Martin L. Beck, Nancy B. Dirven, Hubert A. A. M. Fowle, John R. Goodman, Julie E. Hartung, Thomas Kimber, Ian Lalu, Manoj M. Thayer, Kristina Whaley, Paul Wikoff, Daniele Tsaioun, Katya |
author_facet | Hoffmann, Sebastian de Vries, Rob B. M. Stephens, Martin L. Beck, Nancy B. Dirven, Hubert A. A. M. Fowle, John R. Goodman, Julie E. Hartung, Thomas Kimber, Ian Lalu, Manoj M. Thayer, Kristina Whaley, Paul Wikoff, Daniele Tsaioun, Katya |
author_sort | Hoffmann, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systematic reviews, pioneered in the clinical field, provide a transparent, methodologically rigorous and reproducible means of summarizing the available evidence on a precisely framed research question. Having matured to a well-established approach in many research fields, systematic reviews are receiving increasing attention as a potential tool for answering toxicological questions. In the larger framework of evidence-based toxicology, the advantages and obstacles of, as well as the approaches for, adapting and adopting systematic reviews to toxicology are still being explored. To provide the toxicology community with a starting point for conducting or understanding systematic reviews, we herein summarized available guidance documents from various fields of application. We have elaborated on the systematic review process by breaking it down into ten steps, starting with planning the project, framing the question, and writing and publishing the protocol, and concluding with interpretation and reporting. In addition, we have identified the specific methodological challenges of toxicological questions and have summarized how these can be addressed. Ultimately, this primer is intended to stimulate scientific discussions of the identified issues to fuel the development of toxicology-specific methodology and to encourage the application of systematic review methodology to toxicological issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5489636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54896362017-07-03 A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology Hoffmann, Sebastian de Vries, Rob B. M. Stephens, Martin L. Beck, Nancy B. Dirven, Hubert A. A. M. Fowle, John R. Goodman, Julie E. Hartung, Thomas Kimber, Ian Lalu, Manoj M. Thayer, Kristina Whaley, Paul Wikoff, Daniele Tsaioun, Katya Arch Toxicol Review Article Systematic reviews, pioneered in the clinical field, provide a transparent, methodologically rigorous and reproducible means of summarizing the available evidence on a precisely framed research question. Having matured to a well-established approach in many research fields, systematic reviews are receiving increasing attention as a potential tool for answering toxicological questions. In the larger framework of evidence-based toxicology, the advantages and obstacles of, as well as the approaches for, adapting and adopting systematic reviews to toxicology are still being explored. To provide the toxicology community with a starting point for conducting or understanding systematic reviews, we herein summarized available guidance documents from various fields of application. We have elaborated on the systematic review process by breaking it down into ten steps, starting with planning the project, framing the question, and writing and publishing the protocol, and concluding with interpretation and reporting. In addition, we have identified the specific methodological challenges of toxicological questions and have summarized how these can be addressed. Ultimately, this primer is intended to stimulate scientific discussions of the identified issues to fuel the development of toxicology-specific methodology and to encourage the application of systematic review methodology to toxicological issues. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-13 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5489636/ /pubmed/28501917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hoffmann, Sebastian de Vries, Rob B. M. Stephens, Martin L. Beck, Nancy B. Dirven, Hubert A. A. M. Fowle, John R. Goodman, Julie E. Hartung, Thomas Kimber, Ian Lalu, Manoj M. Thayer, Kristina Whaley, Paul Wikoff, Daniele Tsaioun, Katya A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title | A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title_full | A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title_fullStr | A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title_full_unstemmed | A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title_short | A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
title_sort | primer on systematic reviews in toxicology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28501917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-1980-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmannsebastian aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT devriesrobbm aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT stephensmartinl aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT becknancyb aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT dirvenhubertaam aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT fowlejohnr aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT goodmanjuliee aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT hartungthomas aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT kimberian aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT lalumanojm aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT thayerkristina aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT whaleypaul aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT wikoffdaniele aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT tsaiounkatya aprimeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT hoffmannsebastian primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT devriesrobbm primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT stephensmartinl primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT becknancyb primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT dirvenhubertaam primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT fowlejohnr primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT goodmanjuliee primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT hartungthomas primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT kimberian primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT lalumanojm primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT thayerkristina primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT whaleypaul primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT wikoffdaniele primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology AT tsaiounkatya primeronsystematicreviewsintoxicology |