Cargando…

Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population

Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) strategies and subjective assessment for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian malignancy. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Froyman, Wouter, Wynants, Laure, Landolfo, Chiara, Bourne, Tom, Valentin, Lil, Testa, Antonia, Sladkevicius, Povilas, Franchi, Dorella, Fischerova, Daniela, Savelli, Luca, Van Calster, Ben, Timmerman, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7020032
_version_ 1783246887002832896
author Froyman, Wouter
Wynants, Laure
Landolfo, Chiara
Bourne, Tom
Valentin, Lil
Testa, Antonia
Sladkevicius, Povilas
Franchi, Dorella
Fischerova, Daniela
Savelli, Luca
Van Calster, Ben
Timmerman, Dirk
author_facet Froyman, Wouter
Wynants, Laure
Landolfo, Chiara
Bourne, Tom
Valentin, Lil
Testa, Antonia
Sladkevicius, Povilas
Franchi, Dorella
Fischerova, Daniela
Savelli, Luca
Van Calster, Ben
Timmerman, Dirk
author_sort Froyman, Wouter
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) strategies and subjective assessment for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian malignancy. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study that included 1653 patients recruited at 18 centers from 2009 to 2012. All patients underwent standardized transvaginal ultrasonography by experienced ultrasound investigators. We assessed test performance of the IOTA Simple Rules (SRs), Simple Rules Risk (SRR), the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model and subjective assessment to discriminate between stage I-II ovarian cancer and benign disease. Reference standard was histology after surgery. Results: 230 (13.9%) patients proved to have stage I–II primary invasive ovarian malignancy, and 1423 (86.1%) had benign disease. Sensitivity and specificity with respect to malignancy (95% confidence intervals) of the original SRs (classifying all inconclusive cases as malignant) were 94.3% (90.6% to 96.7%) and 73.4% (71.0% to 75.6%). Subjective assessment had a sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% (85.4% to 93.2%) and 86.7% (84.9% to 88.4%), respectively. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of SRR and ADNEX were 0.917 (0.902 to 0.933) and 0.905 (0.920 to 0.934), respectively. At a 1% risk cut-off, sensitivity and specificity for SRR were 100% (98.4% to 100%) and 38.0% (35.5% to 40.6%), and for ADNEX were 100% (98.4% to 100%) and 19.4% (17.4% to 21.5%). At a 30% risk cut-off, sensitivity and specificity for SRR were 88.3% (83.5% to 91.8%) and 81.1% (79% to 83%), and for ADNEX were 84.5% (80.5% to 89.6%) and 84.5% (82.6% to 86.3%). Conclusion: This study shows that all three IOTA strategies have good ability to discriminate between stage I-II ovarian malignancy and benign disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5489952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54899522017-06-30 Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population Froyman, Wouter Wynants, Laure Landolfo, Chiara Bourne, Tom Valentin, Lil Testa, Antonia Sladkevicius, Povilas Franchi, Dorella Fischerova, Daniela Savelli, Luca Van Calster, Ben Timmerman, Dirk Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the performance of different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) strategies and subjective assessment for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian malignancy. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study that included 1653 patients recruited at 18 centers from 2009 to 2012. All patients underwent standardized transvaginal ultrasonography by experienced ultrasound investigators. We assessed test performance of the IOTA Simple Rules (SRs), Simple Rules Risk (SRR), the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model and subjective assessment to discriminate between stage I-II ovarian cancer and benign disease. Reference standard was histology after surgery. Results: 230 (13.9%) patients proved to have stage I–II primary invasive ovarian malignancy, and 1423 (86.1%) had benign disease. Sensitivity and specificity with respect to malignancy (95% confidence intervals) of the original SRs (classifying all inconclusive cases as malignant) were 94.3% (90.6% to 96.7%) and 73.4% (71.0% to 75.6%). Subjective assessment had a sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% (85.4% to 93.2%) and 86.7% (84.9% to 88.4%), respectively. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves of SRR and ADNEX were 0.917 (0.902 to 0.933) and 0.905 (0.920 to 0.934), respectively. At a 1% risk cut-off, sensitivity and specificity for SRR were 100% (98.4% to 100%) and 38.0% (35.5% to 40.6%), and for ADNEX were 100% (98.4% to 100%) and 19.4% (17.4% to 21.5%). At a 30% risk cut-off, sensitivity and specificity for SRR were 88.3% (83.5% to 91.8%) and 81.1% (79% to 83%), and for ADNEX were 84.5% (80.5% to 89.6%) and 84.5% (82.6% to 86.3%). Conclusion: This study shows that all three IOTA strategies have good ability to discriminate between stage I-II ovarian malignancy and benign disease. MDPI 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5489952/ /pubmed/28574444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7020032 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Froyman, Wouter
Wynants, Laure
Landolfo, Chiara
Bourne, Tom
Valentin, Lil
Testa, Antonia
Sladkevicius, Povilas
Franchi, Dorella
Fischerova, Daniela
Savelli, Luca
Van Calster, Ben
Timmerman, Dirk
Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title_full Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title_fullStr Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title_short Validation of the Performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Methods in the Diagnosis of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer in a Non-Screening Population
title_sort validation of the performance of international ovarian tumor analysis (iota) methods in the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in a non-screening population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5489952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7020032
work_keys_str_mv AT froymanwouter validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT wynantslaure validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT landolfochiara validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT bournetom validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT valentinlil validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT testaantonia validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT sladkeviciuspovilas validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT franchidorella validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT fischerovadaniela validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT savelliluca validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT vancalsterben validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation
AT timmermandirk validationoftheperformanceofinternationalovariantumoranalysisiotamethodsinthediagnosisofearlystageovariancancerinanonscreeningpopulation