Cargando…

Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage (HICH) is the most common form of haemorrhagic stroke with the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke types. The choice of surgical or conservative treatment for patients with HICH remains controversial. In recent years, minimally invasive su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xinghua, Zheng, Yi, Chen, Xiaolei, Li, Fangye, Zhang, Huaping, Ge, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1
_version_ 1783246927767273472
author Xu, Xinghua
Zheng, Yi
Chen, Xiaolei
Li, Fangye
Zhang, Huaping
Ge, Xin
author_facet Xu, Xinghua
Zheng, Yi
Chen, Xiaolei
Li, Fangye
Zhang, Huaping
Ge, Xin
author_sort Xu, Xinghua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage (HICH) is the most common form of haemorrhagic stroke with the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke types. The choice of surgical or conservative treatment for patients with HICH remains controversial. In recent years, minimally invasive surgeries, such as endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration, have been attempted for haematoma removal and offer promise. However, research evidence on the benefits of endoscopic evacuation or stereotactic aspiration is still insufficient. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial will be conducted to compare the efficacy of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy in the treatment of supratentorial HICH. About 1350 eligible patients from 10 neurosurgical centres will be randomly assigned to an endoscopic group, a stereotactic group and a craniotomy group at a 1:1:1 ratio. Randomisation is undertaken using a 24-h randomisation service accessed by telephone or the Internet. All patients will receive the corresponding surgery based on their grouping. They will be followed-up at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include: haematoma clearance rate; Glasgow Coma Scale 7 days after surgery; rebleeding rate; intracranial infection rate; hospitalisation time; mortality at 1 month and 3 months after surgery; the Barthel Index and the WHO quality of life at 3 months and 6 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to investigate whether endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration could improve the outcome of supratentorial HICH compared with craniotomy. The trial will help to determine the best surgical method for the treatment of supratentorial HICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02811614. Registered on 20 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5490150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54901502017-06-30 Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Xu, Xinghua Zheng, Yi Chen, Xiaolei Li, Fangye Zhang, Huaping Ge, Xin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage (HICH) is the most common form of haemorrhagic stroke with the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke types. The choice of surgical or conservative treatment for patients with HICH remains controversial. In recent years, minimally invasive surgeries, such as endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration, have been attempted for haematoma removal and offer promise. However, research evidence on the benefits of endoscopic evacuation or stereotactic aspiration is still insufficient. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial will be conducted to compare the efficacy of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy in the treatment of supratentorial HICH. About 1350 eligible patients from 10 neurosurgical centres will be randomly assigned to an endoscopic group, a stereotactic group and a craniotomy group at a 1:1:1 ratio. Randomisation is undertaken using a 24-h randomisation service accessed by telephone or the Internet. All patients will receive the corresponding surgery based on their grouping. They will be followed-up at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin Scale at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include: haematoma clearance rate; Glasgow Coma Scale 7 days after surgery; rebleeding rate; intracranial infection rate; hospitalisation time; mortality at 1 month and 3 months after surgery; the Barthel Index and the WHO quality of life at 3 months and 6 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to investigate whether endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration could improve the outcome of supratentorial HICH compared with craniotomy. The trial will help to determine the best surgical method for the treatment of supratentorial HICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02811614. Registered on 20 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5490150/ /pubmed/28659171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Xu, Xinghua
Zheng, Yi
Chen, Xiaolei
Li, Fangye
Zhang, Huaping
Ge, Xin
Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28659171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxinghua comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhengyi comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxiaolei comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lifangye comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhanghuaping comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gexin comparisonofendoscopicevacuationstereotacticaspirationandcraniotomyforthetreatmentofsupratentorialhypertensiveintracerebralhaemorrhagestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial