Cargando…

Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?

BACKGROUND: Since the mid eighties, responsiveness is considered to be a separate property of health status questionnaires distinct from reliability and validity. The aim of the study was to assess the strength of the relationship between internal consistency reliability, referring to an instrument&...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindeboom, Robert, Sprangers, Mirjam A, Zwinderman, Aeilko H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15691385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-8
_version_ 1782122378470359040
author Lindeboom, Robert
Sprangers, Mirjam A
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
author_facet Lindeboom, Robert
Sprangers, Mirjam A
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
author_sort Lindeboom, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the mid eighties, responsiveness is considered to be a separate property of health status questionnaires distinct from reliability and validity. The aim of the study was to assess the strength of the relationship between internal consistency reliability, referring to an instrument's sensitivity to differences in health status among subjects at one point in time, and responsiveness referring to sensitivity to health status changes over time. METHODS: We used three different datasets comprising the scores of patients on the Barthel, the SIP and the GO-QoL instruments at two points in time. The internal consistency was reduced stepwise by removing the item that contributed most to a scale's reliability. We calculated the responsiveness expressed by the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) on each set of remaining items. The strength of the relationship between the thus obtained internal consistency coefficients and SRMs was quantified by Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Strong to perfect correlations (0.90 – 1.00) was found between internal consistency coefficients and SRMs for all instruments indicating, that the two can be used interchangeably. CONCLUSION: The results contradict the conviction that responsiveness is a separate psychometric property. The internal consistency coefficient adequately reflects an instrument's potential sensitivity to changes over time.
format Text
id pubmed-549031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5490312005-02-18 Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel? Lindeboom, Robert Sprangers, Mirjam A Zwinderman, Aeilko H Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Since the mid eighties, responsiveness is considered to be a separate property of health status questionnaires distinct from reliability and validity. The aim of the study was to assess the strength of the relationship between internal consistency reliability, referring to an instrument's sensitivity to differences in health status among subjects at one point in time, and responsiveness referring to sensitivity to health status changes over time. METHODS: We used three different datasets comprising the scores of patients on the Barthel, the SIP and the GO-QoL instruments at two points in time. The internal consistency was reduced stepwise by removing the item that contributed most to a scale's reliability. We calculated the responsiveness expressed by the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) on each set of remaining items. The strength of the relationship between the thus obtained internal consistency coefficients and SRMs was quantified by Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Strong to perfect correlations (0.90 – 1.00) was found between internal consistency coefficients and SRMs for all instruments indicating, that the two can be used interchangeably. CONCLUSION: The results contradict the conviction that responsiveness is a separate psychometric property. The internal consistency coefficient adequately reflects an instrument's potential sensitivity to changes over time. BioMed Central 2005-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC549031/ /pubmed/15691385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-8 Text en Copyright © 2005 Lindeboom et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lindeboom, Robert
Sprangers, Mirjam A
Zwinderman, Aeilko H
Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title_full Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title_fullStr Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title_short Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
title_sort responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15691385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lindeboomrobert responsivenessareinventionofthewheel
AT sprangersmirjama responsivenessareinventionofthewheel
AT zwindermanaeilkoh responsivenessareinventionofthewheel