Cargando…

Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language

BACKGROUND: The development and validation study of the Clinical Chronic Obstructive Disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ) has recently been published in this journal. The CCQ is the first questionnaire that incorporates both clinician and patient guideline goals in the clinical control evaluation of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damato, Salvatore, Bonatti, Chiara, Frigo, Vinicio, Pappagallo, Silvana, Raccanelli, Rita, Rampoldi, Claudio, Rodi, Francesco
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15698477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-9
_version_ 1782122379700338688
author Damato, Salvatore
Bonatti, Chiara
Frigo, Vinicio
Pappagallo, Silvana
Raccanelli, Rita
Rampoldi, Claudio
Rodi, Francesco
author_facet Damato, Salvatore
Bonatti, Chiara
Frigo, Vinicio
Pappagallo, Silvana
Raccanelli, Rita
Rampoldi, Claudio
Rodi, Francesco
author_sort Damato, Salvatore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development and validation study of the Clinical Chronic Obstructive Disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ) has recently been published in this journal. The CCQ is the first questionnaire that incorporates both clinician and patient guideline goals in the clinical control evaluation of patients with COPD in general clinical practice. The aim of this study is the validation of the CCQ questionnaire in Italian, in specific pulmonary disease clinical practice. METHODS: Validity was tested on a population of healthy subjects and patients with COPD, using the Italian validated version of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and guideline recommended routine measurement in COPD patients (FEV(1), FVC, BMI and functional dyspnoea). Test-retest reliability was tested by re-administering the CCQ after 2 weeks. Responsiveness was tested by re-administering the CCQ after three weeks of hospital pulmonary rehabilitation. Distance walked and Borg breathlessness rating were measured at the end of the six-minute walking test (6 MWT), before and after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 175 subjects (55 healthy; 40 mild-moderate, 50 severe and 25 very severe COPD). Cronbach's alpha was high (0.89). The CCQ scores in patients were significantly worse than in healthy subjects. The CCQ total score in patients with COPD was significantly worse in those with BMI < = 21. Significant correlations were found between the CCQ total score and domains of the SF-36 (rho = -0.43 to rho = -0.72). The correlation between the CCQ and FEV1 % predicted was rho = -0.57. The correlation between the CCQ and MRC was rho = 0.63. Test-retest reliability was determined in 112 subjects over a period of two weeks (Intra Class Coefficient = 0.99). Forty-six patients with COPD showed significant improvement in CCQ scores, distance-walked and Borg breathlessness rating after 3 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation, indicating CCQ responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The CCQ is self-administered and has been specially developed to measure clinical control in patients with COPD. Data support its validity, reliability and responsiveness in Italian and in specific pulmonary disease clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-549036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5490362005-02-18 Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language Damato, Salvatore Bonatti, Chiara Frigo, Vinicio Pappagallo, Silvana Raccanelli, Rita Rampoldi, Claudio Rodi, Francesco Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The development and validation study of the Clinical Chronic Obstructive Disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ) has recently been published in this journal. The CCQ is the first questionnaire that incorporates both clinician and patient guideline goals in the clinical control evaluation of patients with COPD in general clinical practice. The aim of this study is the validation of the CCQ questionnaire in Italian, in specific pulmonary disease clinical practice. METHODS: Validity was tested on a population of healthy subjects and patients with COPD, using the Italian validated version of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and guideline recommended routine measurement in COPD patients (FEV(1), FVC, BMI and functional dyspnoea). Test-retest reliability was tested by re-administering the CCQ after 2 weeks. Responsiveness was tested by re-administering the CCQ after three weeks of hospital pulmonary rehabilitation. Distance walked and Borg breathlessness rating were measured at the end of the six-minute walking test (6 MWT), before and after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 175 subjects (55 healthy; 40 mild-moderate, 50 severe and 25 very severe COPD). Cronbach's alpha was high (0.89). The CCQ scores in patients were significantly worse than in healthy subjects. The CCQ total score in patients with COPD was significantly worse in those with BMI < = 21. Significant correlations were found between the CCQ total score and domains of the SF-36 (rho = -0.43 to rho = -0.72). The correlation between the CCQ and FEV1 % predicted was rho = -0.57. The correlation between the CCQ and MRC was rho = 0.63. Test-retest reliability was determined in 112 subjects over a period of two weeks (Intra Class Coefficient = 0.99). Forty-six patients with COPD showed significant improvement in CCQ scores, distance-walked and Borg breathlessness rating after 3 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation, indicating CCQ responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The CCQ is self-administered and has been specially developed to measure clinical control in patients with COPD. Data support its validity, reliability and responsiveness in Italian and in specific pulmonary disease clinical practice. BioMed Central 2005-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC549036/ /pubmed/15698477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-9 Text en Copyright © 2005 Damato et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Damato, Salvatore
Bonatti, Chiara
Frigo, Vinicio
Pappagallo, Silvana
Raccanelli, Rita
Rampoldi, Claudio
Rodi, Francesco
Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title_full Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title_fullStr Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title_short Validation of the Clinical COPD questionnaire in Italian language
title_sort validation of the clinical copd questionnaire in italian language
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15698477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-9
work_keys_str_mv AT damatosalvatore validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT bonattichiara validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT frigovinicio validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT pappagallosilvana validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT raccanellirita validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT rampoldiclaudio validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage
AT rodifrancesco validationoftheclinicalcopdquestionnaireinitalianlanguage