Cargando…

The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications

High sulfation, low cost, and the status of heparin as an already FDA- and EMA- approved product, mean that its inclusion in tissue engineering (TE) strategies is becoming increasingly popular. However, the use of heparin may represent a naïve approach. This is because tissue formation is a highly o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayerst, Bethanie I., Merry, Catherine L.R., Day, Anthony J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28608822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph10020054
_version_ 1783246979745185792
author Ayerst, Bethanie I.
Merry, Catherine L.R.
Day, Anthony J.
author_facet Ayerst, Bethanie I.
Merry, Catherine L.R.
Day, Anthony J.
author_sort Ayerst, Bethanie I.
collection PubMed
description High sulfation, low cost, and the status of heparin as an already FDA- and EMA- approved product, mean that its inclusion in tissue engineering (TE) strategies is becoming increasingly popular. However, the use of heparin may represent a naïve approach. This is because tissue formation is a highly orchestrated process, involving the temporal expression of numerous growth factors and complex signaling networks. While heparin may enhance the retention and activity of certain growth factors under particular conditions, its binding ‘promiscuity’ means that it may also inhibit other factors that, for example, play an important role in tissue maintenance and repair. Within this review we focus on articular cartilage, highlighting the complexities and highly regulated processes that are involved in its formation, and the challenges that exist in trying to effectively engineer this tissue. Here we discuss the opportunities that glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) may provide in advancing this important area of regenerative medicine, placing emphasis on the need to move away from the common use of heparin, and instead focus research towards the utility of specific GAG preparations that are able to modulate the activity of growth factors in a more controlled and defined manner, with less off-target effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5490411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54904112017-07-03 The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications Ayerst, Bethanie I. Merry, Catherine L.R. Day, Anthony J. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Review High sulfation, low cost, and the status of heparin as an already FDA- and EMA- approved product, mean that its inclusion in tissue engineering (TE) strategies is becoming increasingly popular. However, the use of heparin may represent a naïve approach. This is because tissue formation is a highly orchestrated process, involving the temporal expression of numerous growth factors and complex signaling networks. While heparin may enhance the retention and activity of certain growth factors under particular conditions, its binding ‘promiscuity’ means that it may also inhibit other factors that, for example, play an important role in tissue maintenance and repair. Within this review we focus on articular cartilage, highlighting the complexities and highly regulated processes that are involved in its formation, and the challenges that exist in trying to effectively engineer this tissue. Here we discuss the opportunities that glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) may provide in advancing this important area of regenerative medicine, placing emphasis on the need to move away from the common use of heparin, and instead focus research towards the utility of specific GAG preparations that are able to modulate the activity of growth factors in a more controlled and defined manner, with less off-target effects. MDPI 2017-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5490411/ /pubmed/28608822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph10020054 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ayerst, Bethanie I.
Merry, Catherine L.R.
Day, Anthony J.
The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title_full The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title_fullStr The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title_full_unstemmed The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title_short The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications
title_sort good the bad and the ugly of glycosaminoglycans in tissue engineering applications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28608822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph10020054
work_keys_str_mv AT ayerstbethaniei thegoodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications
AT merrycatherinelr thegoodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications
AT dayanthonyj thegoodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications
AT ayerstbethaniei goodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications
AT merrycatherinelr goodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications
AT dayanthonyj goodthebadandtheuglyofglycosaminoglycansintissueengineeringapplications