Cargando…

A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector

Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blitvich, Bradley J., Firth, Andrew E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154
_version_ 1783247051979489280
author Blitvich, Bradley J.
Firth, Andrew E.
author_facet Blitvich, Bradley J.
Firth, Andrew E.
author_sort Blitvich, Bradley J.
collection PubMed
description Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known vector (NKV) flaviviruses. Fourteen species and two subtypes of NKV flaviviruses are recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and Tamana bat virus potentially belongs to this group. NKV flaviviruses have been isolated in nature almost exclusively from bats and rodents; exceptions are the two isolates of Dakar bat virus recovered from febrile humans and the recent isolations of Sokoluk virus from field-collected ticks, which raises questions as to whether it should remain classified as an NKV flavivirus. There is evidence to suggest that two other NKV flaviviruses, Entebbe bat virus and Yokose virus, may also infect arthropods in nature. The best characterized bat- and rodent-associated NKV flaviviruses are Rio Bravo and Modoc viruses, respectively, but both have received limited research attention compared to many of their arthropod-infecting counterparts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of NKV flaviviruses, placing a particular emphasis on their classification, host range, geographic distribution, replication kinetics, pathogenesis, transmissibility and molecular biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5490829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54908292017-06-30 A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector Blitvich, Bradley J. Firth, Andrew E. Viruses Review Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known vector (NKV) flaviviruses. Fourteen species and two subtypes of NKV flaviviruses are recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and Tamana bat virus potentially belongs to this group. NKV flaviviruses have been isolated in nature almost exclusively from bats and rodents; exceptions are the two isolates of Dakar bat virus recovered from febrile humans and the recent isolations of Sokoluk virus from field-collected ticks, which raises questions as to whether it should remain classified as an NKV flavivirus. There is evidence to suggest that two other NKV flaviviruses, Entebbe bat virus and Yokose virus, may also infect arthropods in nature. The best characterized bat- and rodent-associated NKV flaviviruses are Rio Bravo and Modoc viruses, respectively, but both have received limited research attention compared to many of their arthropod-infecting counterparts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of NKV flaviviruses, placing a particular emphasis on their classification, host range, geographic distribution, replication kinetics, pathogenesis, transmissibility and molecular biology. MDPI 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5490829/ /pubmed/28635667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Blitvich, Bradley J.
Firth, Andrew E.
A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title_full A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title_fullStr A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title_short A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
title_sort review of flaviviruses that have no known arthropod vector
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154
work_keys_str_mv AT blitvichbradleyj areviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector
AT firthandrewe areviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector
AT blitvichbradleyj reviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector
AT firthandrewe reviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector