Cargando…
A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector
Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known ve...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154 |
_version_ | 1783247051979489280 |
---|---|
author | Blitvich, Bradley J. Firth, Andrew E. |
author_facet | Blitvich, Bradley J. Firth, Andrew E. |
author_sort | Blitvich, Bradley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known vector (NKV) flaviviruses. Fourteen species and two subtypes of NKV flaviviruses are recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and Tamana bat virus potentially belongs to this group. NKV flaviviruses have been isolated in nature almost exclusively from bats and rodents; exceptions are the two isolates of Dakar bat virus recovered from febrile humans and the recent isolations of Sokoluk virus from field-collected ticks, which raises questions as to whether it should remain classified as an NKV flavivirus. There is evidence to suggest that two other NKV flaviviruses, Entebbe bat virus and Yokose virus, may also infect arthropods in nature. The best characterized bat- and rodent-associated NKV flaviviruses are Rio Bravo and Modoc viruses, respectively, but both have received limited research attention compared to many of their arthropod-infecting counterparts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of NKV flaviviruses, placing a particular emphasis on their classification, host range, geographic distribution, replication kinetics, pathogenesis, transmissibility and molecular biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5490829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54908292017-06-30 A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector Blitvich, Bradley J. Firth, Andrew E. Viruses Review Most viruses in the genus Flavivirus are horizontally transmitted between hematophagous arthropods and vertebrate hosts, but some are maintained in arthropod- or vertebrate-restricted transmission cycles. Flaviviruses maintained by vertebrate-only transmission are commonly referred to as no known vector (NKV) flaviviruses. Fourteen species and two subtypes of NKV flaviviruses are recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), and Tamana bat virus potentially belongs to this group. NKV flaviviruses have been isolated in nature almost exclusively from bats and rodents; exceptions are the two isolates of Dakar bat virus recovered from febrile humans and the recent isolations of Sokoluk virus from field-collected ticks, which raises questions as to whether it should remain classified as an NKV flavivirus. There is evidence to suggest that two other NKV flaviviruses, Entebbe bat virus and Yokose virus, may also infect arthropods in nature. The best characterized bat- and rodent-associated NKV flaviviruses are Rio Bravo and Modoc viruses, respectively, but both have received limited research attention compared to many of their arthropod-infecting counterparts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review of NKV flaviviruses, placing a particular emphasis on their classification, host range, geographic distribution, replication kinetics, pathogenesis, transmissibility and molecular biology. MDPI 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5490829/ /pubmed/28635667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Blitvich, Bradley J. Firth, Andrew E. A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title | A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title_full | A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title_fullStr | A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title_short | A Review of Flaviviruses that Have No Known Arthropod Vector |
title_sort | review of flaviviruses that have no known arthropod vector |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v9060154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blitvichbradleyj areviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector AT firthandrewe areviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector AT blitvichbradleyj reviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector AT firthandrewe reviewofflavivirusesthathavenoknownarthropodvector |