A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science

BACKGROUND: Peer review is important to the scientific process. However, the present system has been criticised and accused of bias, lack of transparency, failure to detect significant breakthrough and error. At the British Journal of Surgery (BJS), after surveying authors’ and reviewers’ opinions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almquist, Martin, von Allmen, Regula S., Carradice, Dan, Oosterling, Steven J., McFarlane, Kirsty, Wijnhoven, Bas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179031

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179031

Ejemplares similares