Cargando…
A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science
BACKGROUND: Peer review is important to the scientific process. However, the present system has been criticised and accused of bias, lack of transparency, failure to detect significant breakthrough and error. At the British Journal of Surgery (BJS), after surveying authors’ and reviewers’ opinions o...
Autores principales: | Almquist, Martin, von Allmen, Regula S., Carradice, Dan, Oosterling, Steven J., McFarlane, Kirsty, Wijnhoven, Bas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179031 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Identifying peer experts in online health forums
por: Vydiswaran, V.G.Vinod, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy
por: Lobban, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Wellness Impacts of Social Capital Built in Online Peer Support Forums
por: Kilpatrick, Sue, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Peer Communication in Online Mental Health Forums for Young People: Directional and Nondirectional Support
por: Prescott, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
‘I felt less alone knowing I could contribute to the forum’: psychological distress and use of an online infertility peer support forum
por: O'Connell, Siobhan Bernadette Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2021)