Cargando…
Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary?
The hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) is widely used to evaluate vaccine-induced antibody responses as well as to antigenically characterize influenza viruses. The results of an HAI assay are based on an endpoint titration where the titers are generally manually interpreted and recorded by a w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179939 |
_version_ | 1783247075803136000 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Garrett Ye, Zhiping Xie, Hang Vahl, Steven Dawson, Erica Rowlen, Kathy |
author_facet | Wilson, Garrett Ye, Zhiping Xie, Hang Vahl, Steven Dawson, Erica Rowlen, Kathy |
author_sort | Wilson, Garrett |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) is widely used to evaluate vaccine-induced antibody responses as well as to antigenically characterize influenza viruses. The results of an HAI assay are based on an endpoint titration where the titers are generally manually interpreted and recorded by a well-trained expert. For serological applications, the lack of standardization in endpoint interpretation and interference from non-specific inhibitors in clinical samples can translate into a high degree of variability in the results. For example, tilting HAI plates at 45–60 degrees to look for a “tear drop pattern” with avian red blood cells is a common practice by many, but not all, research laboratories. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that an automated image analysis algorithm can be used to achieve an accurate and non-subjective interpretation of HAI assays—specifically without the need to tilt plates. In a side-by-side comparison study performed during FDA’s biannual serological screening process for influenza viruses, titer calls for more than 2200 serum samples were made by the Cypher One automated hemagglutination analyzer without tilting and by an expert human with tilting. The comparison yielded 95.6% agreement between the expert reader and automated interpretation method (within ± 1 dilution) for the complete dataset. Performance was also evaluated relative to the type of red blood cell (turkey and guinea pig) and influenza strain (12 different viruses). For the subset that utilized guinea pig red blood cells (~44% of the samples), for which no plate tilting was required, the agreement with an expert reader was 97.2%. For the subset that utilized turkey red blood cells (~56% of the samples), for which plate tilting was necessary by the expert reader, the agreement was 94.3%. Overall these results support the postulate that algorithm-based interpretation of a digital record with no plate tilting could replace manual reading for greater consistency in HAI assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5491073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54910732017-07-18 Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? Wilson, Garrett Ye, Zhiping Xie, Hang Vahl, Steven Dawson, Erica Rowlen, Kathy PLoS One Research Article The hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) is widely used to evaluate vaccine-induced antibody responses as well as to antigenically characterize influenza viruses. The results of an HAI assay are based on an endpoint titration where the titers are generally manually interpreted and recorded by a well-trained expert. For serological applications, the lack of standardization in endpoint interpretation and interference from non-specific inhibitors in clinical samples can translate into a high degree of variability in the results. For example, tilting HAI plates at 45–60 degrees to look for a “tear drop pattern” with avian red blood cells is a common practice by many, but not all, research laboratories. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that an automated image analysis algorithm can be used to achieve an accurate and non-subjective interpretation of HAI assays—specifically without the need to tilt plates. In a side-by-side comparison study performed during FDA’s biannual serological screening process for influenza viruses, titer calls for more than 2200 serum samples were made by the Cypher One automated hemagglutination analyzer without tilting and by an expert human with tilting. The comparison yielded 95.6% agreement between the expert reader and automated interpretation method (within ± 1 dilution) for the complete dataset. Performance was also evaluated relative to the type of red blood cell (turkey and guinea pig) and influenza strain (12 different viruses). For the subset that utilized guinea pig red blood cells (~44% of the samples), for which no plate tilting was required, the agreement with an expert reader was 97.2%. For the subset that utilized turkey red blood cells (~56% of the samples), for which plate tilting was necessary by the expert reader, the agreement was 94.3%. Overall these results support the postulate that algorithm-based interpretation of a digital record with no plate tilting could replace manual reading for greater consistency in HAI assays. Public Library of Science 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5491073/ /pubmed/28662088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179939 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wilson, Garrett Ye, Zhiping Xie, Hang Vahl, Steven Dawson, Erica Rowlen, Kathy Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title | Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title_full | Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title_fullStr | Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title_short | Automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays: Is plate tilting necessary? |
title_sort | automated interpretation of influenza hemagglutination inhibition (hai) assays: is plate tilting necessary? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsongarrett automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary AT yezhiping automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary AT xiehang automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary AT vahlsteven automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary AT dawsonerica automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary AT rowlenkathy automatedinterpretationofinfluenzahemagglutinationinhibitionhaiassaysisplatetiltingnecessary |