Cargando…

Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting

This research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts’ feedb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela, Rio-Belver, Rosa María, Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375
_version_ 1783247102689673216
author Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela
Rio-Belver, Rosa María
Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka
author_facet Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela
Rio-Belver, Rosa María
Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka
author_sort Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela
collection PubMed
description This research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts’ feedback. It enables the definition of the growth rate of scientific and technological output in terms of the top countries, institutions and journals producing knowledge within the field as well as the identification of main areas of research and development by analyzing the International Patent Classification codes including keyword clusterization and co-occurrence of patent assignees and patent codes. This model was applied to the evolving domain of 3D bioprinting. Scientific documents from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, along with patents from 27 authorities and 140 countries, were retrieved. In total, 4782 scientific publications and 706 patents were identified from 2000 to mid-2016. The number of scientific documents published and patents in the last five years showed an annual average growth of 20% and 40%, respectively. Results indicate that the most prolific nations and institutions publishing on 3D bioprinting are the USA and China, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA), Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and Tsinghua University (China), respectively. Biomaterials and Biofabrication are the predominant journals. The most prolific patenting countries are China and the USA; while Organovo Holdings Inc. (USA) and Tsinghua University (China) are the institutions leading. International Patent Classification codes reveal that most 3D bioprinting inventions intended for medical purposes apply porous or cellular materials or biologically active materials. Knowledge clusters and expert drivers indicate that there is a research focus on tissue engineering including the fabrication of organs, bioinks and new 3D bioprinting systems. Our model offers a guide to researchers to understand the knowledge production of pioneering technologies, in this case 3D bioprinting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54912162017-07-18 Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela Rio-Belver, Rosa María Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka PLoS One Research Article This research proposes an innovative data model to determine the landscape of emerging technologies. It is based on a competitive technology intelligence methodology that incorporates the assessment of scientific publications and patent analysis production, and is further supported by experts’ feedback. It enables the definition of the growth rate of scientific and technological output in terms of the top countries, institutions and journals producing knowledge within the field as well as the identification of main areas of research and development by analyzing the International Patent Classification codes including keyword clusterization and co-occurrence of patent assignees and patent codes. This model was applied to the evolving domain of 3D bioprinting. Scientific documents from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, along with patents from 27 authorities and 140 countries, were retrieved. In total, 4782 scientific publications and 706 patents were identified from 2000 to mid-2016. The number of scientific documents published and patents in the last five years showed an annual average growth of 20% and 40%, respectively. Results indicate that the most prolific nations and institutions publishing on 3D bioprinting are the USA and China, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA), Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and Tsinghua University (China), respectively. Biomaterials and Biofabrication are the predominant journals. The most prolific patenting countries are China and the USA; while Organovo Holdings Inc. (USA) and Tsinghua University (China) are the institutions leading. International Patent Classification codes reveal that most 3D bioprinting inventions intended for medical purposes apply porous or cellular materials or biologically active materials. Knowledge clusters and expert drivers indicate that there is a research focus on tissue engineering including the fabrication of organs, bioinks and new 3D bioprinting systems. Our model offers a guide to researchers to understand the knowledge production of pioneering technologies, in this case 3D bioprinting. Public Library of Science 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5491216/ /pubmed/28662187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375 Text en © 2017 Rodríguez-Salvador et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rodríguez-Salvador, Marisela
Rio-Belver, Rosa María
Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka
Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title_full Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title_fullStr Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title_full_unstemmed Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title_short Scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: The case of 3D bioprinting
title_sort scientometric and patentometric analyses to determine the knowledge landscape in innovative technologies: the case of 3d bioprinting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180375
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezsalvadormarisela scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting
AT riobelverrosamaria scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting
AT garechanaanacabegaizka scientometricandpatentometricanalysestodeterminetheknowledgelandscapeininnovativetechnologiesthecaseof3dbioprinting