Cargando…

Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model

European bat lyssavirus 1 is responsible for most bat rabies cases in Europe. Although EBLV-1 isolates display a high degree of sequence identity, different sublineages exist. In individual isolates various insertions and deletions have been identified, with unknown impact on viral replication and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggerbauer, Elisa, Pfaff, Florian, Finke, Stefan, Höper, Dirk, Beer, Martin, Mettenleiter, Thomas C., Nolden, Tobias, Teifke, Jens-Peter, Müller, Thomas, Freuling, Conrad M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28628617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005668
_version_ 1783247117407485952
author Eggerbauer, Elisa
Pfaff, Florian
Finke, Stefan
Höper, Dirk
Beer, Martin
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Nolden, Tobias
Teifke, Jens-Peter
Müller, Thomas
Freuling, Conrad M.
author_facet Eggerbauer, Elisa
Pfaff, Florian
Finke, Stefan
Höper, Dirk
Beer, Martin
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Nolden, Tobias
Teifke, Jens-Peter
Müller, Thomas
Freuling, Conrad M.
author_sort Eggerbauer, Elisa
collection PubMed
description European bat lyssavirus 1 is responsible for most bat rabies cases in Europe. Although EBLV-1 isolates display a high degree of sequence identity, different sublineages exist. In individual isolates various insertions and deletions have been identified, with unknown impact on viral replication and pathogenicity. In order to assess whether different genetic features of EBLV-1 isolates correlate with phenotypic changes, different EBLV-1 variants were compared for pathogenicity in the mouse model. Groups of three mice were infected intracranially (i.c.) with 10(2) TCID50/ml and groups of six mice were infected intramuscularly (i.m.) with 10(5) TCID50/ml and 10(2) TCID50/ml as well as intranasally (i.n.) with 10(2) TCID50/ml. Significant differences in survival following i.m. inoculation with low doses as well as i.n. inoculation were observed. Also, striking variations in incubation periods following i.c. inoculation and i.m. inoculation with high doses were seen. Hereby, the clinical picture differed between general symptoms, spasms and aggressiveness depending on the inoculation route. Immunohistochemistry of mouse brains showed that the virus distribution in the brain depended on the inoculation route. In conclusion, different EBLV-1 isolates differ in pathogenicity indicating variation which is not reflected in studies of single isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54913152017-07-18 Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model Eggerbauer, Elisa Pfaff, Florian Finke, Stefan Höper, Dirk Beer, Martin Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Nolden, Tobias Teifke, Jens-Peter Müller, Thomas Freuling, Conrad M. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article European bat lyssavirus 1 is responsible for most bat rabies cases in Europe. Although EBLV-1 isolates display a high degree of sequence identity, different sublineages exist. In individual isolates various insertions and deletions have been identified, with unknown impact on viral replication and pathogenicity. In order to assess whether different genetic features of EBLV-1 isolates correlate with phenotypic changes, different EBLV-1 variants were compared for pathogenicity in the mouse model. Groups of three mice were infected intracranially (i.c.) with 10(2) TCID50/ml and groups of six mice were infected intramuscularly (i.m.) with 10(5) TCID50/ml and 10(2) TCID50/ml as well as intranasally (i.n.) with 10(2) TCID50/ml. Significant differences in survival following i.m. inoculation with low doses as well as i.n. inoculation were observed. Also, striking variations in incubation periods following i.c. inoculation and i.m. inoculation with high doses were seen. Hereby, the clinical picture differed between general symptoms, spasms and aggressiveness depending on the inoculation route. Immunohistochemistry of mouse brains showed that the virus distribution in the brain depended on the inoculation route. In conclusion, different EBLV-1 isolates differ in pathogenicity indicating variation which is not reflected in studies of single isolates. Public Library of Science 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5491315/ /pubmed/28628617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005668 Text en © 2017 Eggerbauer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eggerbauer, Elisa
Pfaff, Florian
Finke, Stefan
Höper, Dirk
Beer, Martin
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Nolden, Tobias
Teifke, Jens-Peter
Müller, Thomas
Freuling, Conrad M.
Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title_full Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title_short Comparative analysis of European bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
title_sort comparative analysis of european bat lyssavirus 1 pathogenicity in the mouse model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28628617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005668
work_keys_str_mv AT eggerbauerelisa comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT pfaffflorian comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT finkestefan comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT hoperdirk comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT beermartin comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT mettenleiterthomasc comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT noldentobias comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT teifkejenspeter comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT mullerthomas comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel
AT freulingconradm comparativeanalysisofeuropeanbatlyssavirus1pathogenicityinthemousemodel