Cargando…
Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011 |
_version_ | 1783247120795435008 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Clint Rezzoug, Nasser Gorce, Philippe Isableu, Brice Venture, Gentiane |
author_facet | Hansen, Clint Rezzoug, Nasser Gorce, Philippe Isableu, Brice Venture, Gentiane |
author_sort | Hansen, Clint |
collection | PubMed |
description | By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to improve BSIP estimation but to our knowledge a real validation has never been completely successful. In this paper, we propose a validation method using both kinematic and kinetic parameters (contact forces) gathered from optical motion capture system and a force plate respectively. To compare BSIPs, we used the measured contact forces (Force plate) as the ground truth, and reconstructed the displacements of the Center of Pressure (COP) using inverse dynamics from two different estimation techniques. Only minor differences were seen when comparing the estimated segment masses. Their influence on the COP computation however is large and the results show very distinguishable patterns of the COP movements. Improving BSIP techniques is crucial and deviation from the estimations can actually result in large errors. This method could be used as a tool to validate BSIP estimation techniques. An advantage of this approach is that it facilitates the comparison between BSIP estimation methods and more specifically it shows the accuracy of those parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5491329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54913292017-07-18 Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation Hansen, Clint Rezzoug, Nasser Gorce, Philippe Isableu, Brice Venture, Gentiane PLoS One Research Article By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to improve BSIP estimation but to our knowledge a real validation has never been completely successful. In this paper, we propose a validation method using both kinematic and kinetic parameters (contact forces) gathered from optical motion capture system and a force plate respectively. To compare BSIPs, we used the measured contact forces (Force plate) as the ground truth, and reconstructed the displacements of the Center of Pressure (COP) using inverse dynamics from two different estimation techniques. Only minor differences were seen when comparing the estimated segment masses. Their influence on the COP computation however is large and the results show very distinguishable patterns of the COP movements. Improving BSIP techniques is crucial and deviation from the estimations can actually result in large errors. This method could be used as a tool to validate BSIP estimation techniques. An advantage of this approach is that it facilitates the comparison between BSIP estimation methods and more specifically it shows the accuracy of those parameters. Public Library of Science 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5491329/ /pubmed/28662090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011 Text en © 2017 Hansen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hansen, Clint Rezzoug, Nasser Gorce, Philippe Isableu, Brice Venture, Gentiane Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title | Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title_full | Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title_fullStr | Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title_short | Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
title_sort | center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenclint centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation AT rezzougnasser centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation AT gorcephilippe centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation AT isableubrice centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation AT venturegentiane centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation |