Cargando…

Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation

By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Clint, Rezzoug, Nasser, Gorce, Philippe, Isableu, Brice, Venture, Gentiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011
_version_ 1783247120795435008
author Hansen, Clint
Rezzoug, Nasser
Gorce, Philippe
Isableu, Brice
Venture, Gentiane
author_facet Hansen, Clint
Rezzoug, Nasser
Gorce, Philippe
Isableu, Brice
Venture, Gentiane
author_sort Hansen, Clint
collection PubMed
description By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to improve BSIP estimation but to our knowledge a real validation has never been completely successful. In this paper, we propose a validation method using both kinematic and kinetic parameters (contact forces) gathered from optical motion capture system and a force plate respectively. To compare BSIPs, we used the measured contact forces (Force plate) as the ground truth, and reconstructed the displacements of the Center of Pressure (COP) using inverse dynamics from two different estimation techniques. Only minor differences were seen when comparing the estimated segment masses. Their influence on the COP computation however is large and the results show very distinguishable patterns of the COP movements. Improving BSIP techniques is crucial and deviation from the estimations can actually result in large errors. This method could be used as a tool to validate BSIP estimation techniques. An advantage of this approach is that it facilitates the comparison between BSIP estimation methods and more specifically it shows the accuracy of those parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54913292017-07-18 Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation Hansen, Clint Rezzoug, Nasser Gorce, Philippe Isableu, Brice Venture, Gentiane PLoS One Research Article By proposing efficient methods for estimating Body Segment Inertial Parameters’ (BSIP) estimation and validating them with a force plate, it is possible to improve the inverse dynamic computations that are necessary in multiple research areas. Until today a variety of studies have been conducted to improve BSIP estimation but to our knowledge a real validation has never been completely successful. In this paper, we propose a validation method using both kinematic and kinetic parameters (contact forces) gathered from optical motion capture system and a force plate respectively. To compare BSIPs, we used the measured contact forces (Force plate) as the ground truth, and reconstructed the displacements of the Center of Pressure (COP) using inverse dynamics from two different estimation techniques. Only minor differences were seen when comparing the estimated segment masses. Their influence on the COP computation however is large and the results show very distinguishable patterns of the COP movements. Improving BSIP techniques is crucial and deviation from the estimations can actually result in large errors. This method could be used as a tool to validate BSIP estimation techniques. An advantage of this approach is that it facilitates the comparison between BSIP estimation methods and more specifically it shows the accuracy of those parameters. Public Library of Science 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5491329/ /pubmed/28662090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011 Text en © 2017 Hansen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hansen, Clint
Rezzoug, Nasser
Gorce, Philippe
Isableu, Brice
Venture, Gentiane
Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title_full Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title_fullStr Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title_full_unstemmed Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title_short Center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
title_sort center of pressure based segment inertial parameters validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180011
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenclint centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation
AT rezzougnasser centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation
AT gorcephilippe centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation
AT isableubrice centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation
AT venturegentiane centerofpressurebasedsegmentinertialparametersvalidation