Cargando…

Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in selected patients with heart disease known to be at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, this invasive and definitive therapy is not indicated in patients with potentially transient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barraud, Jeremie, Cautela, Jennifer, Orabona, Morgane, Pinto, Johan, Missenard, Olivier, Laine, Marc, Thuny, Franck, Paganelli, Franck, Bonello, Laurent, Peyrol, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706588
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.531
_version_ 1783247133415047168
author Barraud, Jeremie
Cautela, Jennifer
Orabona, Morgane
Pinto, Johan
Missenard, Olivier
Laine, Marc
Thuny, Franck
Paganelli, Franck
Bonello, Laurent
Peyrol, Michael
author_facet Barraud, Jeremie
Cautela, Jennifer
Orabona, Morgane
Pinto, Johan
Missenard, Olivier
Laine, Marc
Thuny, Franck
Paganelli, Franck
Bonello, Laurent
Peyrol, Michael
author_sort Barraud, Jeremie
collection PubMed
description The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in selected patients with heart disease known to be at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, this invasive and definitive therapy is not indicated in patients with potentially transient or reversible causes of sudden death, or in patients with temporary contra-indication for ICD placement. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is increasingly used for SCD prevention both in patients awaiting ICD implantation or with an estimated high risk of ventricular arrhythmia though to be transient. We conducted a review of current clinical uses and benefits of the WCD, and described its technical aspects, limitations and perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54914702017-07-13 Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation? Barraud, Jeremie Cautela, Jennifer Orabona, Morgane Pinto, Johan Missenard, Olivier Laine, Marc Thuny, Franck Paganelli, Franck Bonello, Laurent Peyrol, Michael World J Cardiol Minireviews The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in selected patients with heart disease known to be at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, this invasive and definitive therapy is not indicated in patients with potentially transient or reversible causes of sudden death, or in patients with temporary contra-indication for ICD placement. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is increasingly used for SCD prevention both in patients awaiting ICD implantation or with an estimated high risk of ventricular arrhythmia though to be transient. We conducted a review of current clinical uses and benefits of the WCD, and described its technical aspects, limitations and perspectives. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-06-26 2017-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5491470/ /pubmed/28706588 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.531 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Barraud, Jeremie
Cautela, Jennifer
Orabona, Morgane
Pinto, Johan
Missenard, Olivier
Laine, Marc
Thuny, Franck
Paganelli, Franck
Bonello, Laurent
Peyrol, Michael
Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title_full Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title_fullStr Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title_full_unstemmed Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title_short Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?
title_sort wearable cardioverter defibrillator: bridge or alternative to implantation?
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706588
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.531
work_keys_str_mv AT barraudjeremie wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT cautelajennifer wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT orabonamorgane wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT pintojohan wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT missenardolivier wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT lainemarc wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT thunyfranck wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT paganellifranck wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT bonellolaurent wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation
AT peyrolmichael wearablecardioverterdefibrillatorbridgeoralternativetoimplantation