Cargando…

Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis, Calero-Acuña, Carmen, Márquez-Martín, Eduardo, Quintana Gallego, Esther, Carrasco-Hernández, Laura, Abad Arranz, Maria, Ortega Ruiz, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694697
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962
_version_ 1783247156840235008
author Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis
Calero-Acuña, Carmen
Márquez-Martín, Eduardo
Quintana Gallego, Esther
Carrasco-Hernández, Laura
Abad Arranz, Maria
Ortega Ruiz, Francisco
author_facet Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis
Calero-Acuña, Carmen
Márquez-Martín, Eduardo
Quintana Gallego, Esther
Carrasco-Hernández, Laura
Abad Arranz, Maria
Ortega Ruiz, Francisco
author_sort Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilation for the treatment of COPD, with a specific focus on its efficacy versus placebo and/or monotherapy bronchodilation. METHODS: A systematic review of clinical trials investigating LABA/LAMA combination therapies was conducted. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on June 26, 2016. We specifically selected clinical trials with a randomized controlled or crossover design published in any scientific journal showing the following characteristics: 1) comparison of different LABA/LAMA combinations in a single inhaler for patients with COPD, 2) dose approved in Europe, and 3) focus on efficacy (versus placebo and/or bronchodilator monotherapy) in terms of lung function, respiratory symptoms, or exacerbations. RESULTS: We analyzed 26 clinical trials conducted on 24,338 patients. All LABA/LAMA combinations were consistently able to improve lung function compared with both placebo and bronchodilator monotherapy. Improvements in symptoms were also consistent versus placebo, showing some lack of correlation for some clinical end points and combinations versus monotherapy bronchodilation. Albeit being an exploratory end point, exacerbations showed an improvement with LABA/LAMA combinations over placebo in some trials; however, scarce information was available in comparison with bronchodilator monotherapy in most studies. CONCLUSION: Our data show consistent improvements for LABA/LAMA combinations, albeit with some variability (depending on the clinical end point, the specific combination, and the comparison group). Clinicians should be aware that these are average differences. All treatments should be tailored at the individual level to optimize clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54915712017-07-10 Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis Calero-Acuña, Carmen Márquez-Martín, Eduardo Quintana Gallego, Esther Carrasco-Hernández, Laura Abad Arranz, Maria Ortega Ruiz, Francisco Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilation for the treatment of COPD, with a specific focus on its efficacy versus placebo and/or monotherapy bronchodilation. METHODS: A systematic review of clinical trials investigating LABA/LAMA combination therapies was conducted. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on June 26, 2016. We specifically selected clinical trials with a randomized controlled or crossover design published in any scientific journal showing the following characteristics: 1) comparison of different LABA/LAMA combinations in a single inhaler for patients with COPD, 2) dose approved in Europe, and 3) focus on efficacy (versus placebo and/or bronchodilator monotherapy) in terms of lung function, respiratory symptoms, or exacerbations. RESULTS: We analyzed 26 clinical trials conducted on 24,338 patients. All LABA/LAMA combinations were consistently able to improve lung function compared with both placebo and bronchodilator monotherapy. Improvements in symptoms were also consistent versus placebo, showing some lack of correlation for some clinical end points and combinations versus monotherapy bronchodilation. Albeit being an exploratory end point, exacerbations showed an improvement with LABA/LAMA combinations over placebo in some trials; however, scarce information was available in comparison with bronchodilator monotherapy in most studies. CONCLUSION: Our data show consistent improvements for LABA/LAMA combinations, albeit with some variability (depending on the clinical end point, the specific combination, and the comparison group). Clinicians should be aware that these are average differences. All treatments should be tailored at the individual level to optimize clinical outcomes. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5491571/ /pubmed/28694697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962 Text en © 2017 Lopez-Campos et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis
Calero-Acuña, Carmen
Márquez-Martín, Eduardo
Quintana Gallego, Esther
Carrasco-Hernández, Laura
Abad Arranz, Maria
Ortega Ruiz, Francisco
Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title_full Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title_fullStr Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title_short Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
title_sort double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694697
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezcamposjoseluis doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT caleroacunacarmen doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT marquezmartineduardo doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT quintanagallegoesther doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT carrascohernandezlaura doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT abadarranzmaria doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview
AT ortegaruizfrancisco doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview