Cargando…
Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962 |
_version_ | 1783247156840235008 |
---|---|
author | Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis Calero-Acuña, Carmen Márquez-Martín, Eduardo Quintana Gallego, Esther Carrasco-Hernández, Laura Abad Arranz, Maria Ortega Ruiz, Francisco |
author_facet | Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis Calero-Acuña, Carmen Márquez-Martín, Eduardo Quintana Gallego, Esther Carrasco-Hernández, Laura Abad Arranz, Maria Ortega Ruiz, Francisco |
author_sort | Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilation for the treatment of COPD, with a specific focus on its efficacy versus placebo and/or monotherapy bronchodilation. METHODS: A systematic review of clinical trials investigating LABA/LAMA combination therapies was conducted. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on June 26, 2016. We specifically selected clinical trials with a randomized controlled or crossover design published in any scientific journal showing the following characteristics: 1) comparison of different LABA/LAMA combinations in a single inhaler for patients with COPD, 2) dose approved in Europe, and 3) focus on efficacy (versus placebo and/or bronchodilator monotherapy) in terms of lung function, respiratory symptoms, or exacerbations. RESULTS: We analyzed 26 clinical trials conducted on 24,338 patients. All LABA/LAMA combinations were consistently able to improve lung function compared with both placebo and bronchodilator monotherapy. Improvements in symptoms were also consistent versus placebo, showing some lack of correlation for some clinical end points and combinations versus monotherapy bronchodilation. Albeit being an exploratory end point, exacerbations showed an improvement with LABA/LAMA combinations over placebo in some trials; however, scarce information was available in comparison with bronchodilator monotherapy in most studies. CONCLUSION: Our data show consistent improvements for LABA/LAMA combinations, albeit with some variability (depending on the clinical end point, the specific combination, and the comparison group). Clinicians should be aware that these are average differences. All treatments should be tailored at the individual level to optimize clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5491571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54915712017-07-10 Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis Calero-Acuña, Carmen Márquez-Martín, Eduardo Quintana Gallego, Esther Carrasco-Hernández, Laura Abad Arranz, Maria Ortega Ruiz, Francisco Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: The combination of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is a viable treatment option for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Here, we systematically review the current knowledge on double bronchodilation for the treatment of COPD, with a specific focus on its efficacy versus placebo and/or monotherapy bronchodilation. METHODS: A systematic review of clinical trials investigating LABA/LAMA combination therapies was conducted. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on June 26, 2016. We specifically selected clinical trials with a randomized controlled or crossover design published in any scientific journal showing the following characteristics: 1) comparison of different LABA/LAMA combinations in a single inhaler for patients with COPD, 2) dose approved in Europe, and 3) focus on efficacy (versus placebo and/or bronchodilator monotherapy) in terms of lung function, respiratory symptoms, or exacerbations. RESULTS: We analyzed 26 clinical trials conducted on 24,338 patients. All LABA/LAMA combinations were consistently able to improve lung function compared with both placebo and bronchodilator monotherapy. Improvements in symptoms were also consistent versus placebo, showing some lack of correlation for some clinical end points and combinations versus monotherapy bronchodilation. Albeit being an exploratory end point, exacerbations showed an improvement with LABA/LAMA combinations over placebo in some trials; however, scarce information was available in comparison with bronchodilator monotherapy in most studies. CONCLUSION: Our data show consistent improvements for LABA/LAMA combinations, albeit with some variability (depending on the clinical end point, the specific combination, and the comparison group). Clinicians should be aware that these are average differences. All treatments should be tailored at the individual level to optimize clinical outcomes. Dove Medical Press 2017-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5491571/ /pubmed/28694697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962 Text en © 2017 Lopez-Campos et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis Calero-Acuña, Carmen Márquez-Martín, Eduardo Quintana Gallego, Esther Carrasco-Hernández, Laura Abad Arranz, Maria Ortega Ruiz, Francisco Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title | Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title_full | Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title_short | Double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
title_sort | double bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a crude analysis from a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694697 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S132962 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezcamposjoseluis doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT caleroacunacarmen doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT marquezmartineduardo doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT quintanagallegoesther doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT carrascohernandezlaura doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT abadarranzmaria doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview AT ortegaruizfrancisco doublebronchodilationinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseacrudeanalysisfromasystematicreview |