Cargando…

Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?

Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahoney, P. F., Carr, D. J., Delaney, R. J., Hunt, N., Harrison, S., Breeze, J., Gibb, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y
_version_ 1783247161757007872
author Mahoney, P. F.
Carr, D. J.
Delaney, R. J.
Hunt, N.
Harrison, S.
Breeze, J.
Gibb, I.
author_facet Mahoney, P. F.
Carr, D. J.
Delaney, R. J.
Hunt, N.
Harrison, S.
Breeze, J.
Gibb, I.
author_sort Mahoney, P. F.
collection PubMed
description Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fills’ to simulate brain (3, 5, 7 and 10% gelatine by mass and PermaGel™). The models were subjected to ballistic impact from 7.62 × 39 mm mild steel core bullets. The first part of the work compares the different polyurethanes (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 708 m/s), and the second part compares the different fills (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 680 m/s). The impact events were filmed using high speed cameras. The resulting fracture patterns in the skulls were reviewed and scored by five clinicians experienced in assessing penetrating head injury. In over half of the models, one or more assessors felt aspects of the fracture pattern were close to real injury. Limitations of the model include the skull being manufactured in two parts and the lack of a realistic skin layer. Further work is ongoing to address these.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54915912017-07-13 Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? Mahoney, P. F. Carr, D. J. Delaney, R. J. Hunt, N. Harrison, S. Breeze, J. Gibb, I. Int J Legal Med Original Article Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fills’ to simulate brain (3, 5, 7 and 10% gelatine by mass and PermaGel™). The models were subjected to ballistic impact from 7.62 × 39 mm mild steel core bullets. The first part of the work compares the different polyurethanes (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 708 m/s), and the second part compares the different fills (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 680 m/s). The impact events were filmed using high speed cameras. The resulting fracture patterns in the skulls were reviewed and scored by five clinicians experienced in assessing penetrating head injury. In over half of the models, one or more assessors felt aspects of the fracture pattern were close to real injury. Limitations of the model include the skull being manufactured in two parts and the lack of a realistic skin layer. Further work is ongoing to address these. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5491591/ /pubmed/28271364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahoney, P. F.
Carr, D. J.
Delaney, R. J.
Hunt, N.
Harrison, S.
Breeze, J.
Gibb, I.
Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title_full Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title_fullStr Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title_full_unstemmed Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title_short Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
title_sort does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mahoneypf doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT carrdj doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT delaneyrj doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT huntn doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT harrisons doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT breezej doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns
AT gibbi doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns