Cargando…
Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns?
Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fill...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y |
_version_ | 1783247161757007872 |
---|---|
author | Mahoney, P. F. Carr, D. J. Delaney, R. J. Hunt, N. Harrison, S. Breeze, J. Gibb, I. |
author_facet | Mahoney, P. F. Carr, D. J. Delaney, R. J. Hunt, N. Harrison, S. Breeze, J. Gibb, I. |
author_sort | Mahoney, P. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fills’ to simulate brain (3, 5, 7 and 10% gelatine by mass and PermaGel™). The models were subjected to ballistic impact from 7.62 × 39 mm mild steel core bullets. The first part of the work compares the different polyurethanes (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 708 m/s), and the second part compares the different fills (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 680 m/s). The impact events were filmed using high speed cameras. The resulting fracture patterns in the skulls were reviewed and scored by five clinicians experienced in assessing penetrating head injury. In over half of the models, one or more assessors felt aspects of the fracture pattern were close to real injury. Limitations of the model include the skull being manufactured in two parts and the lack of a realistic skin layer. Further work is ongoing to address these. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5491591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54915912017-07-13 Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? Mahoney, P. F. Carr, D. J. Delaney, R. J. Hunt, N. Harrison, S. Breeze, J. Gibb, I. Int J Legal Med Original Article Ballistic head injury remains a significant threat to military personnel. Studying such injuries requires a model that can be used with a military helmet. This paper describes further work on a skull-brain model using skulls made from three different polyurethane plastics and a series of skull ‘fills’ to simulate brain (3, 5, 7 and 10% gelatine by mass and PermaGel™). The models were subjected to ballistic impact from 7.62 × 39 mm mild steel core bullets. The first part of the work compares the different polyurethanes (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 708 m/s), and the second part compares the different fills (mean bullet muzzle velocity of 680 m/s). The impact events were filmed using high speed cameras. The resulting fracture patterns in the skulls were reviewed and scored by five clinicians experienced in assessing penetrating head injury. In over half of the models, one or more assessors felt aspects of the fracture pattern were close to real injury. Limitations of the model include the skull being manufactured in two parts and the lack of a realistic skin layer. Further work is ongoing to address these. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5491591/ /pubmed/28271364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahoney, P. F. Carr, D. J. Delaney, R. J. Hunt, N. Harrison, S. Breeze, J. Gibb, I. Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title | Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title_full | Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title_fullStr | Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title_short | Does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
title_sort | does preliminary optimisation of an anatomically correct skull-brain model using simple simulants produce clinically realistic ballistic injury fracture patterns? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28271364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1557-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahoneypf doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT carrdj doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT delaneyrj doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT huntn doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT harrisons doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT breezej doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns AT gibbi doespreliminaryoptimisationofananatomicallycorrectskullbrainmodelusingsimplesimulantsproduceclinicallyrealisticballisticinjuryfracturepatterns |