Cargando…

Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK

Growth in planted areas of Miscanthus for biomass in Europe has stagnated since 2010 due to technical challenges, economic barriers and environmental concerns. These limitations need to be overcome before biomass production from Miscanthus can expand to several million hectares. In this paper, we co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hastings, Astley, Mos, Michal, Yesufu, Jalil A., McCalmont, Jon, Schwarz, Kai, Shafei, Reza, Ashman, Chris, Nunn, Chris, Schuele, Heinrich, Cosentino, Salvatore, Scalici, Giovanni, Scordia, Danilo, Wagner, Moritz, Clifton-Brown, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01058
_version_ 1783247210191781888
author Hastings, Astley
Mos, Michal
Yesufu, Jalil A.
McCalmont, Jon
Schwarz, Kai
Shafei, Reza
Ashman, Chris
Nunn, Chris
Schuele, Heinrich
Cosentino, Salvatore
Scalici, Giovanni
Scordia, Danilo
Wagner, Moritz
Clifton-Brown, John
author_facet Hastings, Astley
Mos, Michal
Yesufu, Jalil A.
McCalmont, Jon
Schwarz, Kai
Shafei, Reza
Ashman, Chris
Nunn, Chris
Schuele, Heinrich
Cosentino, Salvatore
Scalici, Giovanni
Scordia, Danilo
Wagner, Moritz
Clifton-Brown, John
author_sort Hastings, Astley
collection PubMed
description Growth in planted areas of Miscanthus for biomass in Europe has stagnated since 2010 due to technical challenges, economic barriers and environmental concerns. These limitations need to be overcome before biomass production from Miscanthus can expand to several million hectares. In this paper, we consider the economic and environmental effects of introducing seed based hybrids as an alternative to clonal M. x giganteus (Mxg). The impact of seed based propagation and novel agronomy was compared with current Mxg cultivation and used in 10 commercially relevant, field scale experiments planted between 2012 and 2014 in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Ukraine. Economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions costs were quantified for the following production chain: propagation, establishment, harvest, transportation, storage, and fuel preparation (excluding soil carbon changes). The production and utilization efficiency of seed and rhizome propagation were compared. Results show that new hybrid seed propagation significantly reduces establishment cost to below £900 ha(-1). Calculated GHG emission costs for the seeds established via plugs, though relatively small, was higher than rhizomes because fossil fuels were assumed to heat glasshouses for raising seedling plugs (5.3 and 1.5 kg CO(2) eq. C Mg [dry matter (DM)](-1)), respectively. Plastic mulch film reduced establishment time, improving crop economics. The breakeven yield was calculated to be 6 Mg DM ha(-1) y(-1), which is about half average United Kingdom yield for Mxg; with newer seeded hybrids reaching 16 Mg DM ha(-1) in second year United Kingdom trials. These combined improvements will significantly increase crop profitability. The trade-offs between costs of production for the preparation of different feedstock formats show that bales are the best option for direct firing with the lowest transport costs (£0.04 Mg(-1) km(-1)) and easy on-farm storage. However, if pelleted fuel is required then chip harvesting is more economic. We show how current seed based propagation methods can increase the rate at which Miscanthus can be scaled up; ∼×100 those of current rhizome propagation. These rapid ramp rates for biomass production are required to deliver a scalable and economic Miscanthus biomass fuel whose GHG emissions are ∼1/20th those of natural gas per unit of heat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5491852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54918522017-07-14 Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK Hastings, Astley Mos, Michal Yesufu, Jalil A. McCalmont, Jon Schwarz, Kai Shafei, Reza Ashman, Chris Nunn, Chris Schuele, Heinrich Cosentino, Salvatore Scalici, Giovanni Scordia, Danilo Wagner, Moritz Clifton-Brown, John Front Plant Sci Plant Science Growth in planted areas of Miscanthus for biomass in Europe has stagnated since 2010 due to technical challenges, economic barriers and environmental concerns. These limitations need to be overcome before biomass production from Miscanthus can expand to several million hectares. In this paper, we consider the economic and environmental effects of introducing seed based hybrids as an alternative to clonal M. x giganteus (Mxg). The impact of seed based propagation and novel agronomy was compared with current Mxg cultivation and used in 10 commercially relevant, field scale experiments planted between 2012 and 2014 in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Ukraine. Economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions costs were quantified for the following production chain: propagation, establishment, harvest, transportation, storage, and fuel preparation (excluding soil carbon changes). The production and utilization efficiency of seed and rhizome propagation were compared. Results show that new hybrid seed propagation significantly reduces establishment cost to below £900 ha(-1). Calculated GHG emission costs for the seeds established via plugs, though relatively small, was higher than rhizomes because fossil fuels were assumed to heat glasshouses for raising seedling plugs (5.3 and 1.5 kg CO(2) eq. C Mg [dry matter (DM)](-1)), respectively. Plastic mulch film reduced establishment time, improving crop economics. The breakeven yield was calculated to be 6 Mg DM ha(-1) y(-1), which is about half average United Kingdom yield for Mxg; with newer seeded hybrids reaching 16 Mg DM ha(-1) in second year United Kingdom trials. These combined improvements will significantly increase crop profitability. The trade-offs between costs of production for the preparation of different feedstock formats show that bales are the best option for direct firing with the lowest transport costs (£0.04 Mg(-1) km(-1)) and easy on-farm storage. However, if pelleted fuel is required then chip harvesting is more economic. We show how current seed based propagation methods can increase the rate at which Miscanthus can be scaled up; ∼×100 those of current rhizome propagation. These rapid ramp rates for biomass production are required to deliver a scalable and economic Miscanthus biomass fuel whose GHG emissions are ∼1/20th those of natural gas per unit of heat. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5491852/ /pubmed/28713395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01058 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hastings, Mos, Yesufu, McCalmont, Schwarz, Shafei, Ashman, Nunn, Schuele, Cosentino, Scalici, Scordia, Wagner and Clifton-Brown. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Hastings, Astley
Mos, Michal
Yesufu, Jalil A.
McCalmont, Jon
Schwarz, Kai
Shafei, Reza
Ashman, Chris
Nunn, Chris
Schuele, Heinrich
Cosentino, Salvatore
Scalici, Giovanni
Scordia, Danilo
Wagner, Moritz
Clifton-Brown, John
Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title_full Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title_fullStr Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title_short Economic and Environmental Assessment of Seed and Rhizome Propagated Miscanthus in the UK
title_sort economic and environmental assessment of seed and rhizome propagated miscanthus in the uk
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5491852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01058
work_keys_str_mv AT hastingsastley economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT mosmichal economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT yesufujalila economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT mccalmontjon economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT schwarzkai economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT shafeireza economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT ashmanchris economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT nunnchris economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT schueleheinrich economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT cosentinosalvatore economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT scalicigiovanni economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT scordiadanilo economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT wagnermoritz economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk
AT cliftonbrownjohn economicandenvironmentalassessmentofseedandrhizomepropagatedmiscanthusintheuk