Cargando…

3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System

The online and accurate monitoring of drinking water supply networks is critically in demand to rapidly detect the accidental or deliberate contamination of drinking water. At present, miniaturized water quality monitoring sensors developed in the laboratories are usually tested under ambient pressu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banna, Muinul, Bera, Kaustav, Sochol, Ryan, Lin, Liwei, Najjaran, Homayoun, Sadiq, Rehan, Hoorfar, Mina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061336
_version_ 1783247296216956928
author Banna, Muinul
Bera, Kaustav
Sochol, Ryan
Lin, Liwei
Najjaran, Homayoun
Sadiq, Rehan
Hoorfar, Mina
author_facet Banna, Muinul
Bera, Kaustav
Sochol, Ryan
Lin, Liwei
Najjaran, Homayoun
Sadiq, Rehan
Hoorfar, Mina
author_sort Banna, Muinul
collection PubMed
description The online and accurate monitoring of drinking water supply networks is critically in demand to rapidly detect the accidental or deliberate contamination of drinking water. At present, miniaturized water quality monitoring sensors developed in the laboratories are usually tested under ambient pressure and steady-state flow conditions; however, in Water Distribution Systems (WDS), both the pressure and the flowrate fluctuate. In this paper, an interface is designed and fabricated using additive manufacturing or 3D printing technology—material extrusion (Trade Name: fused deposition modeling, FDM) and material jetting—to provide a conduit for miniaturized sensors for continuous online water quality monitoring. The interface is designed to meet two main criteria: low pressure at the inlet of the sensors and a low flowrate to minimize the water bled (i.e., leakage), despite varying pressure from WDS. To meet the above criteria, a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model was used to optimize the geometry of the channel. The 3D printed interface, with the embedded miniaturized pH and conductivity sensors, was then tested at different temperatures and flowrates. The results show that the response of the pH sensor is independent of the flowrate and temperature. As for the conductivity sensor, the flowrate and temperature affect only the readings at a very low conductivity (4 µS/cm) and high flowrates (30 mL/min), and a very high conductivity (460 µS/cm), respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5492283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54922832017-07-03 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System Banna, Muinul Bera, Kaustav Sochol, Ryan Lin, Liwei Najjaran, Homayoun Sadiq, Rehan Hoorfar, Mina Sensors (Basel) Article The online and accurate monitoring of drinking water supply networks is critically in demand to rapidly detect the accidental or deliberate contamination of drinking water. At present, miniaturized water quality monitoring sensors developed in the laboratories are usually tested under ambient pressure and steady-state flow conditions; however, in Water Distribution Systems (WDS), both the pressure and the flowrate fluctuate. In this paper, an interface is designed and fabricated using additive manufacturing or 3D printing technology—material extrusion (Trade Name: fused deposition modeling, FDM) and material jetting—to provide a conduit for miniaturized sensors for continuous online water quality monitoring. The interface is designed to meet two main criteria: low pressure at the inlet of the sensors and a low flowrate to minimize the water bled (i.e., leakage), despite varying pressure from WDS. To meet the above criteria, a two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model was used to optimize the geometry of the channel. The 3D printed interface, with the embedded miniaturized pH and conductivity sensors, was then tested at different temperatures and flowrates. The results show that the response of the pH sensor is independent of the flowrate and temperature. As for the conductivity sensor, the flowrate and temperature affect only the readings at a very low conductivity (4 µS/cm) and high flowrates (30 mL/min), and a very high conductivity (460 µS/cm), respectively. MDPI 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5492283/ /pubmed/28594387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061336 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Banna, Muinul
Bera, Kaustav
Sochol, Ryan
Lin, Liwei
Najjaran, Homayoun
Sadiq, Rehan
Hoorfar, Mina
3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title_full 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title_fullStr 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title_full_unstemmed 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title_short 3D Printing-Based Integrated Water Quality Sensing System
title_sort 3d printing-based integrated water quality sensing system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17061336
work_keys_str_mv AT bannamuinul 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT berakaustav 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT socholryan 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT linliwei 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT najjaranhomayoun 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT sadiqrehan 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem
AT hoorfarmina 3dprintingbasedintegratedwaterqualitysensingsystem