Cargando…
Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Persecutory delusions are the most common type of delusions in psychosis and present in around 10–15% of the general population. Persecutory delusions are thought to be sustained by biased cognitive and emotional processes. Recent advances favour targeted interventions, focussing on spec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x |
_version_ | 1783247345668849664 |
---|---|
author | Yiend, Jenny Trotta, Antonella Meek, Christopher Dzafic, Ilvana Baldus, Nora Crane, Bryony Kabir, Thomas Stahl, Daniel Heslin, Margaret Shergill, Sukhwinder McGuire, Philip Peters, Emmanuelle |
author_facet | Yiend, Jenny Trotta, Antonella Meek, Christopher Dzafic, Ilvana Baldus, Nora Crane, Bryony Kabir, Thomas Stahl, Daniel Heslin, Margaret Shergill, Sukhwinder McGuire, Philip Peters, Emmanuelle |
author_sort | Yiend, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Persecutory delusions are the most common type of delusions in psychosis and present in around 10–15% of the general population. Persecutory delusions are thought to be sustained by biased cognitive and emotional processes. Recent advances favour targeted interventions, focussing on specific symptoms or mechanisms. Our aim is to test the clinical feasibility of a novel psychological intervention, which manipulates biased interpretations toward more adaptive processing, in order to reduce paranoia in patients. METHODS: The ‘Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia’ (CBM-pa) study is a feasibility, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) for 60 stabilised outpatients with persistent, distressing paranoid symptoms. Patients will be randomised at a 50:50 ratio, to computerised CBM-pa or a text-reading control intervention, receiving one 40-min session per week, for 6 weeks. CBM-pa involves participants reading stories on a computer screen, completing missing words and answering questions about each story in a way that encourages more helpful beliefs about themselves and others. Treatment as Usual will continue for patients in both groups. Patients will be assessed by a researcher blind to allocation, at baseline, each interim session, post treatment and 1- and 3-month follow-up post treatment. The primary outcome is the feasibility parameters (trial design, recruitment rate and acceptability) of the intervention. The secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms (including severity of paranoia) as assessed by a clinical psychologist, and ‘on-line’ measurement of interpretation bias and stress/distress. The trial is funded by the NHS National Institute for Health Research. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will test whether CBM-pa has the potential to be a cost-effective, accessible and flexible treatment. If the trial proves feasible and demonstrates preliminary evidence of efficacy, a fully powered RCT will be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868. Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5492504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54925042017-06-30 Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Yiend, Jenny Trotta, Antonella Meek, Christopher Dzafic, Ilvana Baldus, Nora Crane, Bryony Kabir, Thomas Stahl, Daniel Heslin, Margaret Shergill, Sukhwinder McGuire, Philip Peters, Emmanuelle Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Persecutory delusions are the most common type of delusions in psychosis and present in around 10–15% of the general population. Persecutory delusions are thought to be sustained by biased cognitive and emotional processes. Recent advances favour targeted interventions, focussing on specific symptoms or mechanisms. Our aim is to test the clinical feasibility of a novel psychological intervention, which manipulates biased interpretations toward more adaptive processing, in order to reduce paranoia in patients. METHODS: The ‘Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia’ (CBM-pa) study is a feasibility, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) for 60 stabilised outpatients with persistent, distressing paranoid symptoms. Patients will be randomised at a 50:50 ratio, to computerised CBM-pa or a text-reading control intervention, receiving one 40-min session per week, for 6 weeks. CBM-pa involves participants reading stories on a computer screen, completing missing words and answering questions about each story in a way that encourages more helpful beliefs about themselves and others. Treatment as Usual will continue for patients in both groups. Patients will be assessed by a researcher blind to allocation, at baseline, each interim session, post treatment and 1- and 3-month follow-up post treatment. The primary outcome is the feasibility parameters (trial design, recruitment rate and acceptability) of the intervention. The secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms (including severity of paranoia) as assessed by a clinical psychologist, and ‘on-line’ measurement of interpretation bias and stress/distress. The trial is funded by the NHS National Institute for Health Research. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will test whether CBM-pa has the potential to be a cost-effective, accessible and flexible treatment. If the trial proves feasible and demonstrates preliminary evidence of efficacy, a fully powered RCT will be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868. Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5492504/ /pubmed/28662715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Yiend, Jenny Trotta, Antonella Meek, Christopher Dzafic, Ilvana Baldus, Nora Crane, Bryony Kabir, Thomas Stahl, Daniel Heslin, Margaret Shergill, Sukhwinder McGuire, Philip Peters, Emmanuelle Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Cognitive Bias Modification for paranoia (CBM-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | cognitive bias modification for paranoia (cbm-pa): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28662715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2037-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yiendjenny cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trottaantonella cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meekchristopher cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dzaficilvana cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT baldusnora cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cranebryony cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kabirthomas cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stahldaniel cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heslinmargaret cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shergillsukhwinder cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcguirephilip cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT petersemmanuelle cognitivebiasmodificationforparanoiacbmpastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |