Cargando…

Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue

Background: Stem cells, with their regeneration capacity, long-term viability, and differentiation characteristics, have indispensable biological properties. As described by Hauner and Grigoradis et al., mesenchymal stem cell originating from adipose or bone marrow can be differentiated into many ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuyucu, Ersin, Erdil, Mehmet, Kara, Adnan, Bülbül, Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28664842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017022
_version_ 1783247401176268800
author Kuyucu, Ersin
Erdil, Mehmet
Kara, Adnan
Bülbül, Murat
author_facet Kuyucu, Ersin
Erdil, Mehmet
Kara, Adnan
Bülbül, Murat
author_sort Kuyucu, Ersin
collection PubMed
description Background: Stem cells, with their regeneration capacity, long-term viability, and differentiation characteristics, have indispensable biological properties. As described by Hauner and Grigoradis et al., mesenchymal stem cell originating from adipose or bone marrow can be differentiated into many tissues such as adipocyte, chondrocyte, myeloblast, and osteoblast. The aim of our study is to compare the use of adipose and tibial bone marrow derived stem cells for therapeutic purposes in orthopedic surgery, which has not been clearly evaluated in the literature to our knowledge and to also evaluate their use. Material and method: Our study was performed between May 2014 and December 2016 in our clinic (Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology) in 40 patients. Twelve patients were excluded. The ages of the 28 included patients ranged from 19 to 61 years, with a mean of 41.18 ± 13.39 years. The stem cell samples of these patients were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Tibial bone marrow stem cells were used in 15 cases and the mean age was 49.33 ± 9.15. Adipose-derived stem cells were used in 13 patients and the mean age was 31.77 ± 11.25. None of the patients had any minor/major complication in the areas where stem cells were collected. Discussion: Tibial-derived bone marrow has better results with regard to the complications, economic burden, and surgery time. Tibial-derived bone marrow harvesting and stem cell preparation time are one-fourth of the stem cell treatment prepared from adipose tissue and the surgical duration is shortened by 45 min. Conclusion: If stem cell use is the preference of the surgeon, we have found that the tibial-derived stem cell system is more advantageous for ease of acquisition, cost analysis, and surgical time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5492787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54927872017-07-10 Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue Kuyucu, Ersin Erdil, Mehmet Kara, Adnan Bülbül, Murat SICOT J Original Article Background: Stem cells, with their regeneration capacity, long-term viability, and differentiation characteristics, have indispensable biological properties. As described by Hauner and Grigoradis et al., mesenchymal stem cell originating from adipose or bone marrow can be differentiated into many tissues such as adipocyte, chondrocyte, myeloblast, and osteoblast. The aim of our study is to compare the use of adipose and tibial bone marrow derived stem cells for therapeutic purposes in orthopedic surgery, which has not been clearly evaluated in the literature to our knowledge and to also evaluate their use. Material and method: Our study was performed between May 2014 and December 2016 in our clinic (Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology) in 40 patients. Twelve patients were excluded. The ages of the 28 included patients ranged from 19 to 61 years, with a mean of 41.18 ± 13.39 years. The stem cell samples of these patients were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Tibial bone marrow stem cells were used in 15 cases and the mean age was 49.33 ± 9.15. Adipose-derived stem cells were used in 13 patients and the mean age was 31.77 ± 11.25. None of the patients had any minor/major complication in the areas where stem cells were collected. Discussion: Tibial-derived bone marrow has better results with regard to the complications, economic burden, and surgery time. Tibial-derived bone marrow harvesting and stem cell preparation time are one-fourth of the stem cell treatment prepared from adipose tissue and the surgical duration is shortened by 45 min. Conclusion: If stem cell use is the preference of the surgeon, we have found that the tibial-derived stem cell system is more advantageous for ease of acquisition, cost analysis, and surgical time. EDP Sciences 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5492787/ /pubmed/28664842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017022 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kuyucu, Ersin
Erdil, Mehmet
Kara, Adnan
Bülbül, Murat
Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title_full Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title_fullStr Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title_full_unstemmed Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title_short Difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
title_sort difference between biomarkers of tibial bone marrow and adipose tissue
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5492787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28664842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017022
work_keys_str_mv AT kuyucuersin differencebetweenbiomarkersoftibialbonemarrowandadiposetissue
AT erdilmehmet differencebetweenbiomarkersoftibialbonemarrowandadiposetissue
AT karaadnan differencebetweenbiomarkersoftibialbonemarrowandadiposetissue
AT bulbulmurat differencebetweenbiomarkersoftibialbonemarrowandadiposetissue