Cargando…
Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles
BACKGROUND: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be used in the treatment of focal cartilage injuries to prevent the onset of osteoarthritis (OA). However, we are yet to understand fully why some individuals do not respond well to this intervention. Identification of a reliable and accurate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1336-7 |
_version_ | 1783247451241578496 |
---|---|
author | Hulme, Charlotte H. Wilson, Emma L. Peffers, Mandy J. Roberts, Sally Simpson, Deborah M. Richardson, James B. Gallacher, Pete Wright, Karina T. |
author_facet | Hulme, Charlotte H. Wilson, Emma L. Peffers, Mandy J. Roberts, Sally Simpson, Deborah M. Richardson, James B. Gallacher, Pete Wright, Karina T. |
author_sort | Hulme, Charlotte H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be used in the treatment of focal cartilage injuries to prevent the onset of osteoarthritis (OA). However, we are yet to understand fully why some individuals do not respond well to this intervention. Identification of a reliable and accurate biomarker panel that can predict which patients are likely to respond well to ACI is needed in order to assign the patient to the most appropriate therapy. This study aimed to compare the baseline and mid-treatment proteomic profiles of synovial fluids (SFs) obtained from responders and non-responders to ACI. METHODS: SFs were derived from 14 ACI responders (mean Lysholm improvement of 33 (17–54)) and 13 non-responders (mean Lysholm decrease of 14 (4–46)) at the two stages of surgery (cartilage harvest and chondrocyte implantation). Label-free proteome profiling of dynamically compressed SFs was used to identify predictive markers of ACI success or failure and to investigate the biological pathways involved in the clinical response to ACI. RESULTS: Only 1 protein displayed a ≥2.0-fold differential abundance in the preclinical SF of ACI responders versus non-responders. However, there is a marked difference between these two groups with regard to their proteome shift in response to cartilage harvest, with 24 and 92 proteins showing ≥2.0-fold differential abundance between Stages I and II in responders and non-responders, respectively. Proteomic data has been uploaded to ProteomeXchange (identifier: PXD005220). We have validated two biologically relevant protein changes associated with this response, demonstrating that matrix metalloproteinase 1 was prominently elevated and S100 calcium binding protein A13 was reduced in response to cartilage harvest in non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The differential proteomic response to cartilage harvest noted in responders versus non-responders is completely novel. Our analyses suggest several pathways which appear to be altered in non-responders that are worthy of further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms of ACI failure. These protein changes highlight many putative biomarkers that may have potential for prediction of ACI treatment success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5493128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54931282017-07-05 Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles Hulme, Charlotte H. Wilson, Emma L. Peffers, Mandy J. Roberts, Sally Simpson, Deborah M. Richardson, James B. Gallacher, Pete Wright, Karina T. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be used in the treatment of focal cartilage injuries to prevent the onset of osteoarthritis (OA). However, we are yet to understand fully why some individuals do not respond well to this intervention. Identification of a reliable and accurate biomarker panel that can predict which patients are likely to respond well to ACI is needed in order to assign the patient to the most appropriate therapy. This study aimed to compare the baseline and mid-treatment proteomic profiles of synovial fluids (SFs) obtained from responders and non-responders to ACI. METHODS: SFs were derived from 14 ACI responders (mean Lysholm improvement of 33 (17–54)) and 13 non-responders (mean Lysholm decrease of 14 (4–46)) at the two stages of surgery (cartilage harvest and chondrocyte implantation). Label-free proteome profiling of dynamically compressed SFs was used to identify predictive markers of ACI success or failure and to investigate the biological pathways involved in the clinical response to ACI. RESULTS: Only 1 protein displayed a ≥2.0-fold differential abundance in the preclinical SF of ACI responders versus non-responders. However, there is a marked difference between these two groups with regard to their proteome shift in response to cartilage harvest, with 24 and 92 proteins showing ≥2.0-fold differential abundance between Stages I and II in responders and non-responders, respectively. Proteomic data has been uploaded to ProteomeXchange (identifier: PXD005220). We have validated two biologically relevant protein changes associated with this response, demonstrating that matrix metalloproteinase 1 was prominently elevated and S100 calcium binding protein A13 was reduced in response to cartilage harvest in non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The differential proteomic response to cartilage harvest noted in responders versus non-responders is completely novel. Our analyses suggest several pathways which appear to be altered in non-responders that are worthy of further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms of ACI failure. These protein changes highlight many putative biomarkers that may have potential for prediction of ACI treatment success. BioMed Central 2017-06-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493128/ /pubmed/28666451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1336-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hulme, Charlotte H. Wilson, Emma L. Peffers, Mandy J. Roberts, Sally Simpson, Deborah M. Richardson, James B. Gallacher, Pete Wright, Karina T. Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title | Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title_full | Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title_fullStr | Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title_short | Autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
title_sort | autologous chondrocyte implantation-derived synovial fluids display distinct responder and non-responder proteomic profiles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1336-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hulmecharlotteh autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT wilsonemmal autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT peffersmandyj autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT robertssally autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT simpsondeborahm autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT richardsonjamesb autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT gallacherpete autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles AT wrightkarinat autologouschondrocyteimplantationderivedsynovialfluidsdisplaydistinctresponderandnonresponderproteomicprofiles |