Cargando…

What I learned from predatory publishers

This article is a first-hand account of the author’s work identifying and listing predatory publishers from 2012 to 2017. Predatory publishers use the gold (author pays) open access model and aim to generate as much revenue as possible, often foregoing a proper peer review. The paper details how pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Beall, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694718
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
_version_ 1783247455939198976
author Beall, Jeffrey
author_facet Beall, Jeffrey
author_sort Beall, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description This article is a first-hand account of the author’s work identifying and listing predatory publishers from 2012 to 2017. Predatory publishers use the gold (author pays) open access model and aim to generate as much revenue as possible, often foregoing a proper peer review. The paper details how predatory publishers came to exist and shows how they were largely enabled and condoned by the open-access social movement, the scholarly publishing industry, and academic librarians. The author describes tactics predatory publishers used to attempt to be removed from his lists, details the damage predatory journals cause to science, and comments on the future of scholarly publishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54931772017-07-10 What I learned from predatory publishers Beall, Jeffrey Biochem Med (Zagreb) Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals This article is a first-hand account of the author’s work identifying and listing predatory publishers from 2012 to 2017. Predatory publishers use the gold (author pays) open access model and aim to generate as much revenue as possible, often foregoing a proper peer review. The paper details how predatory publishers came to exist and shows how they were largely enabled and condoned by the open-access social movement, the scholarly publishing industry, and academic librarians. The author describes tactics predatory publishers used to attempt to be removed from his lists, details the damage predatory journals cause to science, and comments on the future of scholarly publishing. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2017-06-15 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5493177/ /pubmed/28694718 http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals
Beall, Jeffrey
What I learned from predatory publishers
title What I learned from predatory publishers
title_full What I learned from predatory publishers
title_fullStr What I learned from predatory publishers
title_full_unstemmed What I learned from predatory publishers
title_short What I learned from predatory publishers
title_sort what i learned from predatory publishers
topic Research integrity corner: Special issue on predatory journals
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28694718
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
work_keys_str_mv AT bealljeffrey whatilearnedfrompredatorypublishers