Cargando…
Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. Its age-related characteristics have been studied in women in western countries, but whether these associations apply to women worldwide is not known. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We examined cross-sectional differenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335 |
_version_ | 1783247478547546112 |
---|---|
author | Burton, Anya Maskarinec, Gertraud Perez-Gomez, Beatriz Vachon, Celine Miao, Hui Lajous, Martín López-Ridaura, Ruy Rice, Megan Pereira, Ana Garmendia, Maria Luisa Tamimi, Rulla M. Bertrand, Kimberly Kwong, Ava Ursin, Giske Lee, Eunjung Qureshi, Samera A. Ma, Huiyan Vinnicombe, Sarah Moss, Sue Allen, Steve Ndumia, Rose Vinayak, Sudhir Teo, Soo-Hwang Mariapun, Shivaani Fadzli, Farhana Peplonska, Beata Bukowska, Agnieszka Nagata, Chisato Stone, Jennifer Hopper, John Giles, Graham Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Mustafa Erkin Schüz, Joachim Van Gils, Carla H. Wanders, Johanna O. P. Sirous, Reza Sirous, Mehri Hipwell, John Kim, Jisun Lee, Jong Won Dickens, Caroline Hartman, Mikael Chia, Kee-Seng Scott, Christopher Chiarelli, Anna M. Linton, Linda Pollan, Marina Flugelman, Anath Arzee Salem, Dorria Kamal, Rasha Boyd, Norman dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel McCormack, Valerie |
author_facet | Burton, Anya Maskarinec, Gertraud Perez-Gomez, Beatriz Vachon, Celine Miao, Hui Lajous, Martín López-Ridaura, Ruy Rice, Megan Pereira, Ana Garmendia, Maria Luisa Tamimi, Rulla M. Bertrand, Kimberly Kwong, Ava Ursin, Giske Lee, Eunjung Qureshi, Samera A. Ma, Huiyan Vinnicombe, Sarah Moss, Sue Allen, Steve Ndumia, Rose Vinayak, Sudhir Teo, Soo-Hwang Mariapun, Shivaani Fadzli, Farhana Peplonska, Beata Bukowska, Agnieszka Nagata, Chisato Stone, Jennifer Hopper, John Giles, Graham Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Mustafa Erkin Schüz, Joachim Van Gils, Carla H. Wanders, Johanna O. P. Sirous, Reza Sirous, Mehri Hipwell, John Kim, Jisun Lee, Jong Won Dickens, Caroline Hartman, Mikael Chia, Kee-Seng Scott, Christopher Chiarelli, Anna M. Linton, Linda Pollan, Marina Flugelman, Anath Arzee Salem, Dorria Kamal, Rasha Boyd, Norman dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel McCormack, Valerie |
author_sort | Burton, Anya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. Its age-related characteristics have been studied in women in western countries, but whether these associations apply to women worldwide is not known. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We examined cross-sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal status in over 11,000 breast-cancer-free women aged 35–85 years, from 40 ethnicity- and location-specific population groups across 22 countries in the International Consortium on Mammographic Density (ICMD). MD was read centrally using a quantitative method (Cumulus) and its square-root metrics were analysed using meta-analysis of group-level estimates and linear regression models of pooled data, adjusted for body mass index, reproductive factors, mammogram view, image type, and reader. In all, 4,534 women were premenopausal, and 6,481 postmenopausal, at the time of mammography. A large age-adjusted difference in percent MD (PD) between post- and premenopausal women was apparent (–0.46 cm [95% CI: −0.53, −0.39]) and appeared greater in women with lower breast cancer risk profiles; variation across population groups due to heterogeneity (I(2)) was 16.5%. Among premenopausal women, the √PD difference per 10-year increase in age was −0.24 cm (95% CI: −0.34, −0.14; I(2) = 30%), reflecting a compositional change (lower dense area and higher non-dense area, with no difference in breast area). In postmenopausal women, the corresponding difference in √PD (−0.38 cm [95% CI: −0.44, −0.33]; I(2) = 30%) was additionally driven by increasing breast area. The study is limited by different mammography systems and its cross-sectional rather than longitudinal nature. CONCLUSIONS: Declines in MD with increasing age are present premenopausally, continue postmenopausally, and are most pronounced over the menopausal transition. These effects were highly consistent across diverse groups of women worldwide, suggesting that they result from an intrinsic biological, likely hormonal, mechanism common to women. If cumulative breast density is a key determinant of breast cancer risk, younger ages may be the more critical periods for lifestyle modifications aimed at breast density and breast cancer risk reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5493289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54932892017-07-18 Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide Burton, Anya Maskarinec, Gertraud Perez-Gomez, Beatriz Vachon, Celine Miao, Hui Lajous, Martín López-Ridaura, Ruy Rice, Megan Pereira, Ana Garmendia, Maria Luisa Tamimi, Rulla M. Bertrand, Kimberly Kwong, Ava Ursin, Giske Lee, Eunjung Qureshi, Samera A. Ma, Huiyan Vinnicombe, Sarah Moss, Sue Allen, Steve Ndumia, Rose Vinayak, Sudhir Teo, Soo-Hwang Mariapun, Shivaani Fadzli, Farhana Peplonska, Beata Bukowska, Agnieszka Nagata, Chisato Stone, Jennifer Hopper, John Giles, Graham Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Mustafa Erkin Schüz, Joachim Van Gils, Carla H. Wanders, Johanna O. P. Sirous, Reza Sirous, Mehri Hipwell, John Kim, Jisun Lee, Jong Won Dickens, Caroline Hartman, Mikael Chia, Kee-Seng Scott, Christopher Chiarelli, Anna M. Linton, Linda Pollan, Marina Flugelman, Anath Arzee Salem, Dorria Kamal, Rasha Boyd, Norman dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel McCormack, Valerie PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. Its age-related characteristics have been studied in women in western countries, but whether these associations apply to women worldwide is not known. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We examined cross-sectional differences in MD by age and menopausal status in over 11,000 breast-cancer-free women aged 35–85 years, from 40 ethnicity- and location-specific population groups across 22 countries in the International Consortium on Mammographic Density (ICMD). MD was read centrally using a quantitative method (Cumulus) and its square-root metrics were analysed using meta-analysis of group-level estimates and linear regression models of pooled data, adjusted for body mass index, reproductive factors, mammogram view, image type, and reader. In all, 4,534 women were premenopausal, and 6,481 postmenopausal, at the time of mammography. A large age-adjusted difference in percent MD (PD) between post- and premenopausal women was apparent (–0.46 cm [95% CI: −0.53, −0.39]) and appeared greater in women with lower breast cancer risk profiles; variation across population groups due to heterogeneity (I(2)) was 16.5%. Among premenopausal women, the √PD difference per 10-year increase in age was −0.24 cm (95% CI: −0.34, −0.14; I(2) = 30%), reflecting a compositional change (lower dense area and higher non-dense area, with no difference in breast area). In postmenopausal women, the corresponding difference in √PD (−0.38 cm [95% CI: −0.44, −0.33]; I(2) = 30%) was additionally driven by increasing breast area. The study is limited by different mammography systems and its cross-sectional rather than longitudinal nature. CONCLUSIONS: Declines in MD with increasing age are present premenopausally, continue postmenopausally, and are most pronounced over the menopausal transition. These effects were highly consistent across diverse groups of women worldwide, suggesting that they result from an intrinsic biological, likely hormonal, mechanism common to women. If cumulative breast density is a key determinant of breast cancer risk, younger ages may be the more critical periods for lifestyle modifications aimed at breast density and breast cancer risk reduction. Public Library of Science 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5493289/ /pubmed/28666001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335 Text en © 2017 Burton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Burton, Anya Maskarinec, Gertraud Perez-Gomez, Beatriz Vachon, Celine Miao, Hui Lajous, Martín López-Ridaura, Ruy Rice, Megan Pereira, Ana Garmendia, Maria Luisa Tamimi, Rulla M. Bertrand, Kimberly Kwong, Ava Ursin, Giske Lee, Eunjung Qureshi, Samera A. Ma, Huiyan Vinnicombe, Sarah Moss, Sue Allen, Steve Ndumia, Rose Vinayak, Sudhir Teo, Soo-Hwang Mariapun, Shivaani Fadzli, Farhana Peplonska, Beata Bukowska, Agnieszka Nagata, Chisato Stone, Jennifer Hopper, John Giles, Graham Ozmen, Vahit Aribal, Mustafa Erkin Schüz, Joachim Van Gils, Carla H. Wanders, Johanna O. P. Sirous, Reza Sirous, Mehri Hipwell, John Kim, Jisun Lee, Jong Won Dickens, Caroline Hartman, Mikael Chia, Kee-Seng Scott, Christopher Chiarelli, Anna M. Linton, Linda Pollan, Marina Flugelman, Anath Arzee Salem, Dorria Kamal, Rasha Boyd, Norman dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel McCormack, Valerie Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title | Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title_full | Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title_fullStr | Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title_short | Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
title_sort | mammographic density and ageing: a collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burtonanya mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT maskarinecgertraud mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT perezgomezbeatriz mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT vachonceline mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT miaohui mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT lajousmartin mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT lopezridauraruy mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT ricemegan mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT pereiraana mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT garmendiamarialuisa mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT tamimirullam mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT bertrandkimberly mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT kwongava mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT ursingiske mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT leeeunjung mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT qureshisameraa mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT mahuiyan mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT vinnicombesarah mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT mosssue mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT allensteve mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT ndumiarose mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT vinayaksudhir mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT teosoohwang mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT mariapunshivaani mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT fadzlifarhana mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT peplonskabeata mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT bukowskaagnieszka mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT nagatachisato mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT stonejennifer mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT hopperjohn mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT gilesgraham mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT ozmenvahit mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT aribalmustafaerkin mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT schuzjoachim mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT vangilscarlah mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT wandersjohannaop mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT sirousreza mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT sirousmehri mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT hipwelljohn mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT kimjisun mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT leejongwon mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT dickenscaroline mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT hartmanmikael mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT chiakeeseng mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT scottchristopher mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT chiarelliannam mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT lintonlinda mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT pollanmarina mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT flugelmananatharzee mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT salemdorria mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT kamalrasha mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT boydnorman mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT dossantossilvaisabel mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide AT mccormackvalerie mammographicdensityandageingacollaborativepooledanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafrom22countriesworldwide |