Cargando…
User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces
State of the art clinical hand prostheses are controlled in a simple and limited way that allows the activation of one function at a time. More advanced laboratory approaches, based on machine learning, offer a significant increase in functionality, but their clinical impact is limited, mainly due t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04255-x |
_version_ | 1783247527865221120 |
---|---|
author | Hahne, Janne M. Markovic, Marko Farina, Dario |
author_facet | Hahne, Janne M. Markovic, Marko Farina, Dario |
author_sort | Hahne, Janne M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | State of the art clinical hand prostheses are controlled in a simple and limited way that allows the activation of one function at a time. More advanced laboratory approaches, based on machine learning, offer a significant increase in functionality, but their clinical impact is limited, mainly due to lack of reliability. In this study, we analyse two conceptually different machine learning approaches, focusing on their robustness and performance in a closed loop application. A classification (finite number of classes) and a regression (continuous mapping) based projection of EMG into external commands were applied while artificially introducing non-stationarities in the EMG signals. When tested on ten able-bodied individuals and one transradial amputee, the two methods were similarly influenced by non-stationarities when tested offline. However, in online tests, where the user could adapt his muscle activation patterns to the changed conditions, the regression-based approach was significantly less influenced by the changes in signal features than the classification approach. This observation demonstrates, on the one hand, the importance of online tests with users in the loop for assessing the performance of myocontrol approaches. On the other hand, it also demonstrates that regression allows for a better user correction of control commands than classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5493618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54936182017-07-05 User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces Hahne, Janne M. Markovic, Marko Farina, Dario Sci Rep Article State of the art clinical hand prostheses are controlled in a simple and limited way that allows the activation of one function at a time. More advanced laboratory approaches, based on machine learning, offer a significant increase in functionality, but their clinical impact is limited, mainly due to lack of reliability. In this study, we analyse two conceptually different machine learning approaches, focusing on their robustness and performance in a closed loop application. A classification (finite number of classes) and a regression (continuous mapping) based projection of EMG into external commands were applied while artificially introducing non-stationarities in the EMG signals. When tested on ten able-bodied individuals and one transradial amputee, the two methods were similarly influenced by non-stationarities when tested offline. However, in online tests, where the user could adapt his muscle activation patterns to the changed conditions, the regression-based approach was significantly less influenced by the changes in signal features than the classification approach. This observation demonstrates, on the one hand, the importance of online tests with users in the loop for assessing the performance of myocontrol approaches. On the other hand, it also demonstrates that regression allows for a better user correction of control commands than classification. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5493618/ /pubmed/28667260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04255-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hahne, Janne M. Markovic, Marko Farina, Dario User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title | User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title_full | User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title_fullStr | User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title_short | User adaptation in Myoelectric Man-Machine Interfaces |
title_sort | user adaptation in myoelectric man-machine interfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04255-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hahnejannem useradaptationinmyoelectricmanmachineinterfaces AT markovicmarko useradaptationinmyoelectricmanmachineinterfaces AT farinadario useradaptationinmyoelectricmanmachineinterfaces |