Cargando…

Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair

The repair of articular cartilage needs a sufficient number of chondrocytes to replace the defect tissue, and therefore, expansion of cells is generally required. Chondrocytes derived by cellular reprogramming may provide a solution to the limitations of current (stem) cell-based therapies. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Driessen, Britta J.H., Logie, Colin, Vonk, Lucienne A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-017-9382-0
_version_ 1783247549825548288
author Driessen, Britta J.H.
Logie, Colin
Vonk, Lucienne A.
author_facet Driessen, Britta J.H.
Logie, Colin
Vonk, Lucienne A.
author_sort Driessen, Britta J.H.
collection PubMed
description The repair of articular cartilage needs a sufficient number of chondrocytes to replace the defect tissue, and therefore, expansion of cells is generally required. Chondrocytes derived by cellular reprogramming may provide a solution to the limitations of current (stem) cell-based therapies. In this article, two distinct approaches—induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-mediated reprogramming and direct lineage conversion—are analysed and compared according to criteria that encompass the qualification of the method and the derived chondrocytes for the purpose of clinical application. Progress in iPSC generation has provided insights into the replacement of reprogramming factors by small molecules and chemical compounds. As follows, multistage chondrogenic differentiation methods have shown to improve the chondrocyte yield and quality. Nevertheless, the iPSC ‘detour’ remains a time- and cost-consuming approach. Direct conversion of fibroblasts into chondrocytes provides a slight advantage over these aspects compared to the iPSC detour. However, the requirement of constitutive transgene expression to inhibit hypertrophic differentiation limits this approach of being translated to the clinic. It can be concluded that the quality of the derived chondrocytes highly depends on the characteristics of the reprogramming method and that this is important to keep in mind during the experimental set-up. Further research into both reprogramming approaches for clinical cartilage repair has to include proper control groups and epigenetic profiling to optimize the techniques and eventually derive functionally stable articular chondrocytes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54937102017-07-17 Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair Driessen, Britta J.H. Logie, Colin Vonk, Lucienne A. Cell Biol Toxicol Review The repair of articular cartilage needs a sufficient number of chondrocytes to replace the defect tissue, and therefore, expansion of cells is generally required. Chondrocytes derived by cellular reprogramming may provide a solution to the limitations of current (stem) cell-based therapies. In this article, two distinct approaches—induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-mediated reprogramming and direct lineage conversion—are analysed and compared according to criteria that encompass the qualification of the method and the derived chondrocytes for the purpose of clinical application. Progress in iPSC generation has provided insights into the replacement of reprogramming factors by small molecules and chemical compounds. As follows, multistage chondrogenic differentiation methods have shown to improve the chondrocyte yield and quality. Nevertheless, the iPSC ‘detour’ remains a time- and cost-consuming approach. Direct conversion of fibroblasts into chondrocytes provides a slight advantage over these aspects compared to the iPSC detour. However, the requirement of constitutive transgene expression to inhibit hypertrophic differentiation limits this approach of being translated to the clinic. It can be concluded that the quality of the derived chondrocytes highly depends on the characteristics of the reprogramming method and that this is important to keep in mind during the experimental set-up. Further research into both reprogramming approaches for clinical cartilage repair has to include proper control groups and epigenetic profiling to optimize the techniques and eventually derive functionally stable articular chondrocytes. Springer Netherlands 2017-01-31 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493710/ /pubmed/28144824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-017-9382-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Driessen, Britta J.H.
Logie, Colin
Vonk, Lucienne A.
Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title_full Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title_fullStr Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title_full_unstemmed Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title_short Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
title_sort cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-017-9382-0
work_keys_str_mv AT driessenbrittajh cellularreprogrammingforclinicalcartilagerepair
AT logiecolin cellularreprogrammingforclinicalcartilagerepair
AT vonkluciennea cellularreprogrammingforclinicalcartilagerepair