Cargando…
The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs
ABSTRACT: Food sharing is relatively widespread across the animal kingdom, but research into the socio-ecological factors affecting this activity has predominantly focused on primates. These studies do suggest though that food tolerance is linked to the social relationship with potential partners. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2339-8 |
_version_ | 1783247550301601792 |
---|---|
author | Dale, Rachel Range, Friederike Stott, Laura Kotrschal, Kurt Marshall-Pescini, Sarah |
author_facet | Dale, Rachel Range, Friederike Stott, Laura Kotrschal, Kurt Marshall-Pescini, Sarah |
author_sort | Dale, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Food sharing is relatively widespread across the animal kingdom, but research into the socio-ecological factors affecting this activity has predominantly focused on primates. These studies do suggest though that food tolerance is linked to the social relationship with potential partners. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the social factors which influence food tolerance in two canids: wolves and dogs. We presented wolves and dogs with two paradigms: dyadic tolerance tests and group carcass feedings. In the dyadic setting, the affiliative relationship with a partner was the most important factor, with a strong bond promoting more sharing in both species. In the group setting, however, rank was the primary factor determining feeding behavior. Although the dominant individuals of both species defended the carcass more than subordinates, in the dogs, the subordinates mostly stayed away from the resource and the most dominant individual monopolized the food. In the wolves, the subordinates spent as much time as dominant individuals in proximity to, and feeding from, the carcass. Furthermore, subordinate wolves were more able to use persistence strategies than the dogs were. Feeding interactions in the wolves, but not dogs, were also modulated by whether the carcass was on the ground or hanging from a tree. Overall, the social relationship with a partner is important in food distribution in wolves and dogs, but the precise effects are dependent on species and feeding context. We consider how the different socio-ecologies of the two species may be linked to these findings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite the fact that food sharing is relatively widespread in the animal kingdom, the specific factors underlying whether an animal will share with a specific individual are little understood. When it comes to decisions about food sharing in wolves and dogs, friendship is the deciding factor if it is just two of you, but in a bigger group rank position decides your access to the spoils. What is more, it seems that rank positioning is even more important in dogs than wolves as dominant dogs keep the food for themselves while each wolf pack member has a chance to eat. This is the first evidence that the importance of the social relationship in food sharing is dependent on the feeding context in canids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2339-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5493712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54937122017-07-17 The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs Dale, Rachel Range, Friederike Stott, Laura Kotrschal, Kurt Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Behav Ecol Sociobiol Original Article ABSTRACT: Food sharing is relatively widespread across the animal kingdom, but research into the socio-ecological factors affecting this activity has predominantly focused on primates. These studies do suggest though that food tolerance is linked to the social relationship with potential partners. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the social factors which influence food tolerance in two canids: wolves and dogs. We presented wolves and dogs with two paradigms: dyadic tolerance tests and group carcass feedings. In the dyadic setting, the affiliative relationship with a partner was the most important factor, with a strong bond promoting more sharing in both species. In the group setting, however, rank was the primary factor determining feeding behavior. Although the dominant individuals of both species defended the carcass more than subordinates, in the dogs, the subordinates mostly stayed away from the resource and the most dominant individual monopolized the food. In the wolves, the subordinates spent as much time as dominant individuals in proximity to, and feeding from, the carcass. Furthermore, subordinate wolves were more able to use persistence strategies than the dogs were. Feeding interactions in the wolves, but not dogs, were also modulated by whether the carcass was on the ground or hanging from a tree. Overall, the social relationship with a partner is important in food distribution in wolves and dogs, but the precise effects are dependent on species and feeding context. We consider how the different socio-ecologies of the two species may be linked to these findings. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite the fact that food sharing is relatively widespread in the animal kingdom, the specific factors underlying whether an animal will share with a specific individual are little understood. When it comes to decisions about food sharing in wolves and dogs, friendship is the deciding factor if it is just two of you, but in a bigger group rank position decides your access to the spoils. What is more, it seems that rank positioning is even more important in dogs than wolves as dominant dogs keep the food for themselves while each wolf pack member has a chance to eat. This is the first evidence that the importance of the social relationship in food sharing is dependent on the feeding context in canids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2339-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493712/ /pubmed/28725102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2339-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dale, Rachel Range, Friederike Stott, Laura Kotrschal, Kurt Marshall-Pescini, Sarah The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title | The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title_full | The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title_fullStr | The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title_short | The influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
title_sort | influence of social relationship on food tolerance in wolves and dogs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2339-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalerachel theinfluenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT rangefriederike theinfluenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT stottlaura theinfluenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT kotrschalkurt theinfluenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT marshallpescinisarah theinfluenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT dalerachel influenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT rangefriederike influenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT stottlaura influenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT kotrschalkurt influenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs AT marshallpescinisarah influenceofsocialrelationshiponfoodtoleranceinwolvesanddogs |