Cargando…

Controversies in Thrombolysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hyperte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandercock, Peter A. G., Ricci, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5
_version_ 1783247551508512768
author Sandercock, Peter A. G.
Ricci, Stefano
author_facet Sandercock, Peter A. G.
Ricci, Stefano
author_sort Sandercock, Peter A. G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)) and the publications from the individual patient data analyses of the trials of alteplase conducted by the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists Collaboration. SUMMARY: Despite about a 2% risk of fatal intracerebral haemorrhage, on average, adult patients of all ages treated with 0.9 mg/kg alteplase within 4.5 h will have better long-term functional outcome. The use of a lower dose of alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) is associated with a lower risk of haemorrhage but its effect on functional outcome has not been proven to be non-inferior to standard dose therapy. Some clinicians feel confident to treat selected patients who present beyond 4.5 h or have unknown time of onset, but many also agree that the current trials and other research is needed to reliably define the optimum imaging methods and treatment eligibility criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54937172017-07-27 Controversies in Thrombolysis Sandercock, Peter A. G. Ricci, Stefano Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)) and the publications from the individual patient data analyses of the trials of alteplase conducted by the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists Collaboration. SUMMARY: Despite about a 2% risk of fatal intracerebral haemorrhage, on average, adult patients of all ages treated with 0.9 mg/kg alteplase within 4.5 h will have better long-term functional outcome. The use of a lower dose of alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) is associated with a lower risk of haemorrhage but its effect on functional outcome has not been proven to be non-inferior to standard dose therapy. Some clinicians feel confident to treat selected patients who present beyond 4.5 h or have unknown time of onset, but many also agree that the current trials and other research is needed to reliably define the optimum imaging methods and treatment eligibility criteria. Springer US 2017-06-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493717/ /pubmed/28667504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor)
Sandercock, Peter A. G.
Ricci, Stefano
Controversies in Thrombolysis
title Controversies in Thrombolysis
title_full Controversies in Thrombolysis
title_fullStr Controversies in Thrombolysis
title_full_unstemmed Controversies in Thrombolysis
title_short Controversies in Thrombolysis
title_sort controversies in thrombolysis
topic Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5
work_keys_str_mv AT sandercockpeterag controversiesinthrombolysis
AT riccistefano controversiesinthrombolysis