Cargando…
Controversies in Thrombolysis
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hyperte...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5 |
_version_ | 1783247551508512768 |
---|---|
author | Sandercock, Peter A. G. Ricci, Stefano |
author_facet | Sandercock, Peter A. G. Ricci, Stefano |
author_sort | Sandercock, Peter A. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)) and the publications from the individual patient data analyses of the trials of alteplase conducted by the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists Collaboration. SUMMARY: Despite about a 2% risk of fatal intracerebral haemorrhage, on average, adult patients of all ages treated with 0.9 mg/kg alteplase within 4.5 h will have better long-term functional outcome. The use of a lower dose of alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) is associated with a lower risk of haemorrhage but its effect on functional outcome has not been proven to be non-inferior to standard dose therapy. Some clinicians feel confident to treat selected patients who present beyond 4.5 h or have unknown time of onset, but many also agree that the current trials and other research is needed to reliably define the optimum imaging methods and treatment eligibility criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5493717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54937172017-07-27 Controversies in Thrombolysis Sandercock, Peter A. G. Ricci, Stefano Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the review is to examine recent evidence on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis and identify the remaining uncertainties. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the results of two large trials (the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) and The Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)) and the publications from the individual patient data analyses of the trials of alteplase conducted by the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists Collaboration. SUMMARY: Despite about a 2% risk of fatal intracerebral haemorrhage, on average, adult patients of all ages treated with 0.9 mg/kg alteplase within 4.5 h will have better long-term functional outcome. The use of a lower dose of alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) is associated with a lower risk of haemorrhage but its effect on functional outcome has not been proven to be non-inferior to standard dose therapy. Some clinicians feel confident to treat selected patients who present beyond 4.5 h or have unknown time of onset, but many also agree that the current trials and other research is needed to reliably define the optimum imaging methods and treatment eligibility criteria. Springer US 2017-06-30 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493717/ /pubmed/28667504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor) Sandercock, Peter A. G. Ricci, Stefano Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title | Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title_full | Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title_fullStr | Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title_short | Controversies in Thrombolysis |
title_sort | controversies in thrombolysis |
topic | Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28667504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0767-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandercockpeterag controversiesinthrombolysis AT riccistefano controversiesinthrombolysis |