Cargando…

SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer

At the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, several interesting phase II and phase III studies investigating systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer were presented. The PrEGOC 0102 trial demonstrated that the combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus is safe and effective and could be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gampenrieder, Simon Peter, Rinnerthaler, Gabriel, Greil, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-017-0326-4
_version_ 1783247553476689920
author Gampenrieder, Simon Peter
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Greil, Richard
author_facet Gampenrieder, Simon Peter
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Greil, Richard
author_sort Gampenrieder, Simon Peter
collection PubMed
description At the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, several interesting phase II and phase III studies investigating systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer were presented. The PrEGOC 0102 trial demonstrated that the combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus is safe and effective and could be an alternative to exemestane plus everolimus for selected patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative disease. The pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib showed some activity in combination with fulvestrant after failure of everolimus in the BELLE-3 trial. PIK3CA mutation detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was predictive for a buparlisib efficacy. Unfortunately, the unfavorable toxicity profile precludes further development of this drug. Nonetheless, PI3K seems to be a valid target in tumors resistant to mTOR inhibition. The BROCADE phase II trial failed to show a statistically significant benefit by the addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation. The overall response rate, however, was statistically significant higher in the veliparib arm compared to the placebo arm. Data from the phase III trial BROCADE-3 are awaited. Finally, the TNT trial did not identify further biomarkers, in addition to BRCA1/2 germline mutation, for carboplatin benefit in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54937252017-07-17 SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer Gampenrieder, Simon Peter Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Greil, Richard Memo Short Review At the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, several interesting phase II and phase III studies investigating systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer were presented. The PrEGOC 0102 trial demonstrated that the combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus is safe and effective and could be an alternative to exemestane plus everolimus for selected patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative disease. The pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib showed some activity in combination with fulvestrant after failure of everolimus in the BELLE-3 trial. PIK3CA mutation detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was predictive for a buparlisib efficacy. Unfortunately, the unfavorable toxicity profile precludes further development of this drug. Nonetheless, PI3K seems to be a valid target in tumors resistant to mTOR inhibition. The BROCADE phase II trial failed to show a statistically significant benefit by the addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib to carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutation. The overall response rate, however, was statistically significant higher in the veliparib arm compared to the placebo arm. Data from the phase III trial BROCADE-3 are awaited. Finally, the TNT trial did not identify further biomarkers, in addition to BRCA1/2 germline mutation, for carboplatin benefit in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Springer Vienna 2017-04-04 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5493725/ /pubmed/28725277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-017-0326-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Review
Gampenrieder, Simon Peter
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Greil, Richard
SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_full SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_short SABCS 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_sort sabcs 2016: systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer
topic Short Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12254-017-0326-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gampenriedersimonpeter sabcs2016systemictherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT rinnerthalergabriel sabcs2016systemictherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT greilrichard sabcs2016systemictherapyformetastaticbreastcancer