Cargando…

EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface

BACKGROUND: Most investigators of brain–computer interface (BCI) research believe that BCI can be achieved through induced neuronal activity from the cortex, but not by evoked neuronal activity. Motor imagery (MI)–based BCI is one of the standard concepts of BCI, in that the user can generate induce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Hohyun, Ahn, Minkyu, Ahn, Sangtae, Kwon, Moonyoung, Jun, Sung Chan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix034
_version_ 1783247555650387968
author Cho, Hohyun
Ahn, Minkyu
Ahn, Sangtae
Kwon, Moonyoung
Jun, Sung Chan
author_facet Cho, Hohyun
Ahn, Minkyu
Ahn, Sangtae
Kwon, Moonyoung
Jun, Sung Chan
author_sort Cho, Hohyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most investigators of brain–computer interface (BCI) research believe that BCI can be achieved through induced neuronal activity from the cortex, but not by evoked neuronal activity. Motor imagery (MI)–based BCI is one of the standard concepts of BCI, in that the user can generate induced activity by imagining motor movements. However, variations in performance over sessions and subjects are too severe to overcome easily; therefore, a basic understanding and investigation of BCI performance variation is necessary to find critical evidence of performance variation. Here we present not only EEG datasets for MI BCI from 52 subjects, but also the results of a psychological and physiological questionnaire, EMG datasets, the locations of 3D EEG electrodes, and EEGs for non-task-related states. FINDINGS: We validated our EEG datasets by using the percentage of bad trials, event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) analysis, and classification analysis. After conventional rejection of bad trials, we showed contralateral ERD and ipsilateral ERS in the somatosensory area, which are well-known patterns of MI. Finally, we showed that 73.08% of datasets (38 subjects) included reasonably discriminative information. CONCLUSIONS: Our EEG datasets included the information necessary to determine statistical significance; they consisted of well-discriminated datasets (38 subjects) and less-discriminative datasets. These may provide researchers with opportunities to investigate human factors related to MI BCI performance variation, and may also achieve subject-to-subject transfer by using metadata, including a questionnaire, EEG coordinates, and EEGs for non-task-related states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54937442017-07-06 EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface Cho, Hohyun Ahn, Minkyu Ahn, Sangtae Kwon, Moonyoung Jun, Sung Chan Gigascience Data Note BACKGROUND: Most investigators of brain–computer interface (BCI) research believe that BCI can be achieved through induced neuronal activity from the cortex, but not by evoked neuronal activity. Motor imagery (MI)–based BCI is one of the standard concepts of BCI, in that the user can generate induced activity by imagining motor movements. However, variations in performance over sessions and subjects are too severe to overcome easily; therefore, a basic understanding and investigation of BCI performance variation is necessary to find critical evidence of performance variation. Here we present not only EEG datasets for MI BCI from 52 subjects, but also the results of a psychological and physiological questionnaire, EMG datasets, the locations of 3D EEG electrodes, and EEGs for non-task-related states. FINDINGS: We validated our EEG datasets by using the percentage of bad trials, event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) analysis, and classification analysis. After conventional rejection of bad trials, we showed contralateral ERD and ipsilateral ERS in the somatosensory area, which are well-known patterns of MI. Finally, we showed that 73.08% of datasets (38 subjects) included reasonably discriminative information. CONCLUSIONS: Our EEG datasets included the information necessary to determine statistical significance; they consisted of well-discriminated datasets (38 subjects) and less-discriminative datasets. These may provide researchers with opportunities to investigate human factors related to MI BCI performance variation, and may also achieve subject-to-subject transfer by using metadata, including a questionnaire, EEG coordinates, and EEGs for non-task-related states. Oxford University Press 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5493744/ /pubmed/28472337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix034 Text en © The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Note
Cho, Hohyun
Ahn, Minkyu
Ahn, Sangtae
Kwon, Moonyoung
Jun, Sung Chan
EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title_full EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title_fullStr EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title_full_unstemmed EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title_short EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
title_sort eeg datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface
topic Data Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix034
work_keys_str_mv AT chohohyun eegdatasetsformotorimagerybraincomputerinterface
AT ahnminkyu eegdatasetsformotorimagerybraincomputerinterface
AT ahnsangtae eegdatasetsformotorimagerybraincomputerinterface
AT kwonmoonyoung eegdatasetsformotorimagerybraincomputerinterface
AT junsungchan eegdatasetsformotorimagerybraincomputerinterface