Cargando…

Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism

The tendency for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to increase with body mass in taxa where males are larger, and to decrease when females are larger, is known as Rensch's rule. In mammals, where the trend occurs, it is believed to be the result of a competitive advantage for larger males, while fem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, P. J., Noonan, M. J., Kitchener, A. C., Harrington, L. A., Newman, C., Macdonald, D. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170453
_version_ 1783247596054118400
author Johnson, P. J.
Noonan, M. J.
Kitchener, A. C.
Harrington, L. A.
Newman, C.
Macdonald, D. W.
author_facet Johnson, P. J.
Noonan, M. J.
Kitchener, A. C.
Harrington, L. A.
Newman, C.
Macdonald, D. W.
author_sort Johnson, P. J.
collection PubMed
description The tendency for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to increase with body mass in taxa where males are larger, and to decrease when females are larger, is known as Rensch's rule. In mammals, where the trend occurs, it is believed to be the result of a competitive advantage for larger males, while female mass is constrained by the energetics of reproduction. Here, we examine the allometry of SSD within the Felidae and Canidae, demonstrating distinctly different patterns: in felids, there is positive allometric scaling, while there is no trend in canids. We hypothesize that feeding ecology, via its effect on female spacing patterns, is responsible for the difference; larger male mass may be advantageous only where females are dispersed such that males can defend access to them. This is supported by the observation that felids are predominately solitary, and all are obligate carnivores. Similarly, carnivorous canids are more sexually dimorphic than insectivores and omnivores, but carnivory does not contribute to a Rensch effect as dietary variation occurs across the mass spectrum. The observed inter-familial differences are also consistent with reduced constraints on female mass in the canids, where litter size increases with body mass, versus no observable allometry in the felids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5493931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54939312017-07-05 Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism Johnson, P. J. Noonan, M. J. Kitchener, A. C. Harrington, L. A. Newman, C. Macdonald, D. W. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) The tendency for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to increase with body mass in taxa where males are larger, and to decrease when females are larger, is known as Rensch's rule. In mammals, where the trend occurs, it is believed to be the result of a competitive advantage for larger males, while female mass is constrained by the energetics of reproduction. Here, we examine the allometry of SSD within the Felidae and Canidae, demonstrating distinctly different patterns: in felids, there is positive allometric scaling, while there is no trend in canids. We hypothesize that feeding ecology, via its effect on female spacing patterns, is responsible for the difference; larger male mass may be advantageous only where females are dispersed such that males can defend access to them. This is supported by the observation that felids are predominately solitary, and all are obligate carnivores. Similarly, carnivorous canids are more sexually dimorphic than insectivores and omnivores, but carnivory does not contribute to a Rensch effect as dietary variation occurs across the mass spectrum. The observed inter-familial differences are also consistent with reduced constraints on female mass in the canids, where litter size increases with body mass, versus no observable allometry in the felids. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5493931/ /pubmed/28680689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170453 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Johnson, P. J.
Noonan, M. J.
Kitchener, A. C.
Harrington, L. A.
Newman, C.
Macdonald, D. W.
Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title_full Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title_fullStr Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title_full_unstemmed Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title_short Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
title_sort rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5493931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170453
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonpj renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism
AT noonanmj renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism
AT kitchenerac renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism
AT harringtonla renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism
AT newmanc renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism
AT macdonalddw renschingcatsanddogsfeedingecologyandfecunditytrendsexplainvariationintheallometryofsexualsizedimorphism