Cargando…
Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare the effect of extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes on dimensional alterations following a ridge preservation procedure. METHODS: One of 2 different ECM membranes was applied during a ridge preservation procedure. A widely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Academy of Periodontology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680712 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165 |
_version_ | 1783247654234357760 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Hyeyoon Kim, Sulhee Hwang, Jin wook Kim, Sungtae Koo, Ki-Tae Kim, Tae-Il Seol, Yang-Jo Lee, Yong-Moo Ku, Young Lee, Jong-Ho Rhyu, In-Chul |
author_facet | Chang, Hyeyoon Kim, Sulhee Hwang, Jin wook Kim, Sungtae Koo, Ki-Tae Kim, Tae-Il Seol, Yang-Jo Lee, Yong-Moo Ku, Young Lee, Jong-Ho Rhyu, In-Chul |
author_sort | Chang, Hyeyoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare the effect of extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes on dimensional alterations following a ridge preservation procedure. METHODS: One of 2 different ECM membranes was applied during a ridge preservation procedure. A widely used ECM membrane (WEM; Bio-Gide, Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) was applied in the treatment group and a newly developed ECM membrane (NEM; Lyso-Gide, Oscotec Inc., Seongnam, Korea) was applied in the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and alginate impressions were obtained 1 week and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Results were analyzed using the independent t-test and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ECM membranes in the changes in the dimension, width, and height of the extraction socket or the quantity of bone tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The NEM showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to the WEM following the ridge preservation procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5494311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Korean Academy of Periodontology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54943112017-07-05 Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket Chang, Hyeyoon Kim, Sulhee Hwang, Jin wook Kim, Sungtae Koo, Ki-Tae Kim, Tae-Il Seol, Yang-Jo Lee, Yong-Moo Ku, Young Lee, Jong-Ho Rhyu, In-Chul J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare the effect of extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes on dimensional alterations following a ridge preservation procedure. METHODS: One of 2 different ECM membranes was applied during a ridge preservation procedure. A widely used ECM membrane (WEM; Bio-Gide, Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) was applied in the treatment group and a newly developed ECM membrane (NEM; Lyso-Gide, Oscotec Inc., Seongnam, Korea) was applied in the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and alginate impressions were obtained 1 week and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Results were analyzed using the independent t-test and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ECM membranes in the changes in the dimension, width, and height of the extraction socket or the quantity of bone tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The NEM showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to the WEM following the ridge preservation procedure. Korean Academy of Periodontology 2017-06 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5494311/ /pubmed/28680712 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165 Text en Copyright © 2017. Korean Academy of Periodontology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chang, Hyeyoon Kim, Sulhee Hwang, Jin wook Kim, Sungtae Koo, Ki-Tae Kim, Tae-Il Seol, Yang-Jo Lee, Yong-Moo Ku, Young Lee, Jong-Ho Rhyu, In-Chul Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title | Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title_full | Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title_fullStr | Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title_short | Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
title_sort | comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680712 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changhyeyoon comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT kimsulhee comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT hwangjinwook comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT kimsungtae comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT kookitae comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT kimtaeil comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT seolyangjo comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT leeyongmoo comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT kuyoung comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT leejongho comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket AT rhyuinchul comparativerandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyofalveolarridgepreservationusinganextracellularmatrixbaseddentalresorbablemembraneintheextractionsocket |