Cargando…

Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis

Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halnes, Geir, Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo, Pettersen, Klas H., Andreassen, Ole A., Einevoll, Gaute T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016
_version_ 1783247665256988672
author Halnes, Geir
Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo
Pettersen, Klas H.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Einevoll, Gaute T.
author_facet Halnes, Geir
Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo
Pettersen, Klas H.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Einevoll, Gaute T.
author_sort Halnes, Geir
collection PubMed
description Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the possible impact from ionic diffusion on recorded potentials. However, it has previously been shown that in physiological conditions with large ion-concentration gradients, diffusive currents can evoke slow shifts in extracellular potentials. Using computer simulations, we here show that diffusion-evoked potential shifts can introduce errors in standard CSD analysis, and can lead to prediction of spurious current sources. Further, we here show that the diffusion-evoked prediction errors can be removed by using an improved CSD estimator which accounts for concentration-dependent effects. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Standard CSD analysis does not account for ionic diffusion. Using biophysically realistic computer simulations, we show that unaccounted-for diffusive currents can lead to the prediction of spurious current sources. This finding may be of strong interest for in vivo electrophysiologists doing extracellular recordings in general, and CSD analysis in particular.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5494370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54943702017-08-04 Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis Halnes, Geir Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo Pettersen, Klas H. Andreassen, Ole A. Einevoll, Gaute T. J Neurophysiol Rapid Report Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the possible impact from ionic diffusion on recorded potentials. However, it has previously been shown that in physiological conditions with large ion-concentration gradients, diffusive currents can evoke slow shifts in extracellular potentials. Using computer simulations, we here show that diffusion-evoked potential shifts can introduce errors in standard CSD analysis, and can lead to prediction of spurious current sources. Further, we here show that the diffusion-evoked prediction errors can be removed by using an improved CSD estimator which accounts for concentration-dependent effects. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Standard CSD analysis does not account for ionic diffusion. Using biophysically realistic computer simulations, we show that unaccounted-for diffusive currents can lead to the prediction of spurious current sources. This finding may be of strong interest for in vivo electrophysiologists doing extracellular recordings in general, and CSD analysis in particular. American Physiological Society 2017-07-01 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5494370/ /pubmed/28298307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016 Text en Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Rapid Report
Halnes, Geir
Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo
Pettersen, Klas H.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Einevoll, Gaute T.
Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title_full Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title_fullStr Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title_short Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
title_sort ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (csd) analysis
topic Rapid Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT halnesgeir iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis
AT makimarttunentuomo iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis
AT pettersenklash iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis
AT andreassenolea iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis
AT einevollgautet iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis