Cargando…
Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis
Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016 |
_version_ | 1783247665256988672 |
---|---|
author | Halnes, Geir Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo Pettersen, Klas H. Andreassen, Ole A. Einevoll, Gaute T. |
author_facet | Halnes, Geir Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo Pettersen, Klas H. Andreassen, Ole A. Einevoll, Gaute T. |
author_sort | Halnes, Geir |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the possible impact from ionic diffusion on recorded potentials. However, it has previously been shown that in physiological conditions with large ion-concentration gradients, diffusive currents can evoke slow shifts in extracellular potentials. Using computer simulations, we here show that diffusion-evoked potential shifts can introduce errors in standard CSD analysis, and can lead to prediction of spurious current sources. Further, we here show that the diffusion-evoked prediction errors can be removed by using an improved CSD estimator which accounts for concentration-dependent effects. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Standard CSD analysis does not account for ionic diffusion. Using biophysically realistic computer simulations, we show that unaccounted-for diffusive currents can lead to the prediction of spurious current sources. This finding may be of strong interest for in vivo electrophysiologists doing extracellular recordings in general, and CSD analysis in particular. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5494370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Physiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54943702017-08-04 Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis Halnes, Geir Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo Pettersen, Klas H. Andreassen, Ole A. Einevoll, Gaute T. J Neurophysiol Rapid Report Current-source density (CSD) analysis is a well-established method for analyzing recorded local field potentials (LFPs), that is, the low-frequency part of extracellular potentials. Standard CSD theory is based on the assumption that all extracellular currents are purely ohmic, and thus neglects the possible impact from ionic diffusion on recorded potentials. However, it has previously been shown that in physiological conditions with large ion-concentration gradients, diffusive currents can evoke slow shifts in extracellular potentials. Using computer simulations, we here show that diffusion-evoked potential shifts can introduce errors in standard CSD analysis, and can lead to prediction of spurious current sources. Further, we here show that the diffusion-evoked prediction errors can be removed by using an improved CSD estimator which accounts for concentration-dependent effects. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Standard CSD analysis does not account for ionic diffusion. Using biophysically realistic computer simulations, we show that unaccounted-for diffusive currents can lead to the prediction of spurious current sources. This finding may be of strong interest for in vivo electrophysiologists doing extracellular recordings in general, and CSD analysis in particular. American Physiological Society 2017-07-01 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5494370/ /pubmed/28298307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016 Text en Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society. |
spellingShingle | Rapid Report Halnes, Geir Mäki-Marttunen, Tuomo Pettersen, Klas H. Andreassen, Ole A. Einevoll, Gaute T. Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title | Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title_full | Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title_fullStr | Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title_short | Ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (CSD) analysis |
title_sort | ion diffusion may introduce spurious current sources in current-source density (csd) analysis |
topic | Rapid Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00976.2016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halnesgeir iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis AT makimarttunentuomo iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis AT pettersenklash iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis AT andreassenolea iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis AT einevollgautet iondiffusionmayintroducespuriouscurrentsourcesincurrentsourcedensitycsdanalysis |