Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia

PURPOSE: To date, the topic of amblyopic changes remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to evaluate choroidal changes in unilateral amblyopia. METHODS: Major literature databases were searched for amblyopia-relevant studies. Using enhanced depth imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yanli, Dong, Yi, Zhao, Kanxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2915261
_version_ 1783247697100144640
author Liu, Yanli
Dong, Yi
Zhao, Kanxing
author_facet Liu, Yanli
Dong, Yi
Zhao, Kanxing
author_sort Liu, Yanli
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To date, the topic of amblyopic changes remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to evaluate choroidal changes in unilateral amblyopia. METHODS: Major literature databases were searched for amblyopia-relevant studies. Using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), the primary outcome parameters examined were subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and different choroidal thickness (CT) positions. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for choroidal-associated changes. We performed subgroup analysis and metaregression analysis to examine potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eleven cross-sectional studies that included a total of 768 participants were identified. The amblyopic eye SFCT was thicker than that of the fellow and control (normal) eyes (WMD(amblyopia versus fellow) = 49.24, 95% CI of 30.22 to 68.27, p < 0.001; WMD(amblyopia versus control) = 54.51, 95% CI of 32.17 to 76.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the fellow and control eyes (WMD = 13.81, 95% CI of 1.16 to 28.77, p = 0.071). Subgroup and metaregression analyses indicated that the OCT type was the main source of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The CT in the amblyopic eyes was thicker than that in the fellow and control eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5494565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54945652017-07-27 A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia Liu, Yanli Dong, Yi Zhao, Kanxing J Ophthalmol Review Article PURPOSE: To date, the topic of amblyopic changes remains controversial. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to evaluate choroidal changes in unilateral amblyopia. METHODS: Major literature databases were searched for amblyopia-relevant studies. Using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), the primary outcome parameters examined were subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and different choroidal thickness (CT) positions. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for choroidal-associated changes. We performed subgroup analysis and metaregression analysis to examine potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eleven cross-sectional studies that included a total of 768 participants were identified. The amblyopic eye SFCT was thicker than that of the fellow and control (normal) eyes (WMD(amblyopia versus fellow) = 49.24, 95% CI of 30.22 to 68.27, p < 0.001; WMD(amblyopia versus control) = 54.51, 95% CI of 32.17 to 76.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the fellow and control eyes (WMD = 13.81, 95% CI of 1.16 to 28.77, p = 0.071). Subgroup and metaregression analyses indicated that the OCT type was the main source of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The CT in the amblyopic eyes was thicker than that in the fellow and control eyes. Hindawi 2017 2017-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5494565/ /pubmed/28751980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2915261 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yanli Liu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Yanli
Dong, Yi
Zhao, Kanxing
A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia
title_sort meta-analysis of choroidal thickness changes in unilateral amblyopia
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2915261
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyanli ametaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia
AT dongyi ametaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia
AT zhaokanxing ametaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia
AT liuyanli metaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia
AT dongyi metaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia
AT zhaokanxing metaanalysisofchoroidalthicknesschangesinunilateralamblyopia