Cargando…

Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species

BACKGROUND: The ever increasing availability of genomes makes it possible to investigate and compare not only the genomic complements of genes and proteins, but also of RNAs. One class of RNAs, the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and, in particular, their subclass of long intergenic noncoding RNAs (li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto, Harrison, Mark C., Bornberg-Bauer, Erich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0985-0
_version_ 1783247723536842752
author Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto
Harrison, Mark C.
Bornberg-Bauer, Erich
author_facet Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto
Harrison, Mark C.
Bornberg-Bauer, Erich
author_sort Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ever increasing availability of genomes makes it possible to investigate and compare not only the genomic complements of genes and proteins, but also of RNAs. One class of RNAs, the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and, in particular, their subclass of long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) have recently gained much attention because of their roles in regulation of important biological processes such as immune response or cell differentiation and as possible evolutionary precursors for protein coding genes. lincRNAs seem to be poorly conserved at the sequence level but at least some lincRNAs have conserved structural elements and syntenic genomic positions. Previous studies showed that transposable elements are a main contribution to the evolution of lincRNAs in mammals. In contrast, plant lincRNA emergence and evolution has been linked with local duplication events. However, little is known about their evolutionary dynamics in general and in insect genomes in particular. RESULTS: Here we compared lincRNAs between seven insect genomes and investigated possible evolutionary changes and functional roles. We find very low sequence conservation between different species and that similarities within a species are mostly due to their association with transposable elements (TE) and simple repeats. Furthermore, we find that TEs are less frequent in lincRNA exons than in their introns, indicating that TEs may have been removed by selection. When we analysed the predicted thermodynamic stabilities of lincRNAs we found that they are more stable than their randomized controls which might indicate some selection pressure to maintain certain structural elements. We list several of the most stable lincRNAs which could serve as prime candidates for future functional studies. We also discuss the possibility of de novo protein coding genes emerging from lincRNAs. This is because lincRNAs with high GC content and potentially with longer open reading frames (ORF) are candidate loci where de novo gene emergence might occur. CONCLUSION: The processes responsible for the emergence and diversification of lincRNAs in insects remain unclear. Both duplication and transposable elements may be important for the creation of new lincRNAs in insects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0985-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5494802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54948022017-07-05 Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto Harrison, Mark C. Bornberg-Bauer, Erich BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The ever increasing availability of genomes makes it possible to investigate and compare not only the genomic complements of genes and proteins, but also of RNAs. One class of RNAs, the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and, in particular, their subclass of long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) have recently gained much attention because of their roles in regulation of important biological processes such as immune response or cell differentiation and as possible evolutionary precursors for protein coding genes. lincRNAs seem to be poorly conserved at the sequence level but at least some lincRNAs have conserved structural elements and syntenic genomic positions. Previous studies showed that transposable elements are a main contribution to the evolution of lincRNAs in mammals. In contrast, plant lincRNA emergence and evolution has been linked with local duplication events. However, little is known about their evolutionary dynamics in general and in insect genomes in particular. RESULTS: Here we compared lincRNAs between seven insect genomes and investigated possible evolutionary changes and functional roles. We find very low sequence conservation between different species and that similarities within a species are mostly due to their association with transposable elements (TE) and simple repeats. Furthermore, we find that TEs are less frequent in lincRNA exons than in their introns, indicating that TEs may have been removed by selection. When we analysed the predicted thermodynamic stabilities of lincRNAs we found that they are more stable than their randomized controls which might indicate some selection pressure to maintain certain structural elements. We list several of the most stable lincRNAs which could serve as prime candidates for future functional studies. We also discuss the possibility of de novo protein coding genes emerging from lincRNAs. This is because lincRNAs with high GC content and potentially with longer open reading frames (ORF) are candidate loci where de novo gene emergence might occur. CONCLUSION: The processes responsible for the emergence and diversification of lincRNAs in insects remain unclear. Both duplication and transposable elements may be important for the creation of new lincRNAs in insects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0985-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5494802/ /pubmed/28673235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0985-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lopez-Ezquerra, Alberto
Harrison, Mark C.
Bornberg-Bauer, Erich
Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title_full Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title_short Comparative analysis of lincRNA in insect species
title_sort comparative analysis of lincrna in insect species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0985-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezezquerraalberto comparativeanalysisoflincrnaininsectspecies
AT harrisonmarkc comparativeanalysisoflincrnaininsectspecies
AT bornbergbauererich comparativeanalysisoflincrnaininsectspecies