Cargando…

The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies

BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaffer, Howard J, Donato, Anthony N, LaBrie, Richard A, Kidman, Rachel C, LaPlante, Debi A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15703082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1
_version_ 1782122421703147520
author Shaffer, Howard J
Donato, Anthony N
LaBrie, Richard A
Kidman, Rachel C
LaPlante, Debi A
author_facet Shaffer, Howard J
Donato, Anthony N
LaBrie, Richard A
Kidman, Rachel C
LaPlante, Debi A
author_sort Shaffer, Howard J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential policies. These results can inform and encourage the development of guidelines, or "best practices," upon which schools can base future policy. METHODS: The college policy information was collected from handbooks, Web sites and supplemental materials of 119 scientifically selected colleges included in the fourth (2001) Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (CAS). A coding instrument of 40 items measured the scope and focus of school alcohol and gambling policies. This instrument included items to measure the presence of specific policies and establish whether the policies were punitive or rehabilitative. A total of 11 coders followed a process of information extraction, coding and arbitration used successfully in other published studies to codify policy information. RESULTS: Although all schools had a student alcohol use policy, only 26 schools (22%) had a gambling policy. Punitive and restrictive alcohol policies were most prevalent; recovery-oriented policies were present at fewer than 30% of schools. Certain alcohol and gambling policies had significant relationships with student binge drinking rates. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of college recovery-oriented policies suggests that schools might be overlooking the value of rehabilitative measures in reducing addictive behaviors among students. Since there are few college gambling-related policies, schools might be missing an opportunity to inform students about the dangers of excessive gambling.
format Text
id pubmed-549515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5495152005-02-25 The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies Shaffer, Howard J Donato, Anthony N LaBrie, Richard A Kidman, Rachel C LaPlante, Debi A Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential policies. These results can inform and encourage the development of guidelines, or "best practices," upon which schools can base future policy. METHODS: The college policy information was collected from handbooks, Web sites and supplemental materials of 119 scientifically selected colleges included in the fourth (2001) Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (CAS). A coding instrument of 40 items measured the scope and focus of school alcohol and gambling policies. This instrument included items to measure the presence of specific policies and establish whether the policies were punitive or rehabilitative. A total of 11 coders followed a process of information extraction, coding and arbitration used successfully in other published studies to codify policy information. RESULTS: Although all schools had a student alcohol use policy, only 26 schools (22%) had a gambling policy. Punitive and restrictive alcohol policies were most prevalent; recovery-oriented policies were present at fewer than 30% of schools. Certain alcohol and gambling policies had significant relationships with student binge drinking rates. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of college recovery-oriented policies suggests that schools might be overlooking the value of rehabilitative measures in reducing addictive behaviors among students. Since there are few college gambling-related policies, schools might be missing an opportunity to inform students about the dangers of excessive gambling. BioMed Central 2005-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC549515/ /pubmed/15703082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1 Text en Copyright © 2005 Shaffer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shaffer, Howard J
Donato, Anthony N
LaBrie, Richard A
Kidman, Rachel C
LaPlante, Debi A
The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title_full The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title_fullStr The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title_full_unstemmed The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title_short The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
title_sort epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15703082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shafferhowardj theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT donatoanthonyn theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT labriericharda theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT kidmanrachelc theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT laplantedebia theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT shafferhowardj epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT donatoanthonyn epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT labriericharda epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT kidmanrachelc epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies
AT laplantedebia epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies