Cargando…
The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies
BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential pol...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15703082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1 |
_version_ | 1782122421703147520 |
---|---|
author | Shaffer, Howard J Donato, Anthony N LaBrie, Richard A Kidman, Rachel C LaPlante, Debi A |
author_facet | Shaffer, Howard J Donato, Anthony N LaBrie, Richard A Kidman, Rachel C LaPlante, Debi A |
author_sort | Shaffer, Howard J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential policies. These results can inform and encourage the development of guidelines, or "best practices," upon which schools can base future policy. METHODS: The college policy information was collected from handbooks, Web sites and supplemental materials of 119 scientifically selected colleges included in the fourth (2001) Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (CAS). A coding instrument of 40 items measured the scope and focus of school alcohol and gambling policies. This instrument included items to measure the presence of specific policies and establish whether the policies were punitive or rehabilitative. A total of 11 coders followed a process of information extraction, coding and arbitration used successfully in other published studies to codify policy information. RESULTS: Although all schools had a student alcohol use policy, only 26 schools (22%) had a gambling policy. Punitive and restrictive alcohol policies were most prevalent; recovery-oriented policies were present at fewer than 30% of schools. Certain alcohol and gambling policies had significant relationships with student binge drinking rates. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of college recovery-oriented policies suggests that schools might be overlooking the value of rehabilitative measures in reducing addictive behaviors among students. Since there are few college gambling-related policies, schools might be missing an opportunity to inform students about the dangers of excessive gambling. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-549515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5495152005-02-25 The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies Shaffer, Howard J Donato, Anthony N LaBrie, Richard A Kidman, Rachel C LaPlante, Debi A Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: This article reports the first national assessment of patterns of drinking and gambling-related rulemaking on college campuses (e.g., punitive versus recovery oriented). Analyses relating school policies to known school rates of drinking or gambling identified potentially influential policies. These results can inform and encourage the development of guidelines, or "best practices," upon which schools can base future policy. METHODS: The college policy information was collected from handbooks, Web sites and supplemental materials of 119 scientifically selected colleges included in the fourth (2001) Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study (CAS). A coding instrument of 40 items measured the scope and focus of school alcohol and gambling policies. This instrument included items to measure the presence of specific policies and establish whether the policies were punitive or rehabilitative. A total of 11 coders followed a process of information extraction, coding and arbitration used successfully in other published studies to codify policy information. RESULTS: Although all schools had a student alcohol use policy, only 26 schools (22%) had a gambling policy. Punitive and restrictive alcohol policies were most prevalent; recovery-oriented policies were present at fewer than 30% of schools. Certain alcohol and gambling policies had significant relationships with student binge drinking rates. CONCLUSIONS: The relative lack of college recovery-oriented policies suggests that schools might be overlooking the value of rehabilitative measures in reducing addictive behaviors among students. Since there are few college gambling-related policies, schools might be missing an opportunity to inform students about the dangers of excessive gambling. BioMed Central 2005-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC549515/ /pubmed/15703082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1 Text en Copyright © 2005 Shaffer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Shaffer, Howard J Donato, Anthony N LaBrie, Richard A Kidman, Rachel C LaPlante, Debi A The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title | The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title_full | The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title_fullStr | The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title_full_unstemmed | The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title_short | The epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
title_sort | epidemiology of college alcohol and gambling policies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC549515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15703082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-2-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shafferhowardj theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT donatoanthonyn theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT labriericharda theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT kidmanrachelc theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT laplantedebia theepidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT shafferhowardj epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT donatoanthonyn epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT labriericharda epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT kidmanrachelc epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies AT laplantedebia epidemiologyofcollegealcoholandgamblingpolicies |