Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization

BACKGROUND: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem resulting from many risk factors and human behaviors. Some of these may interact synergistically and have been implicated in the cause of low back pain. Massage both traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization as a common pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juntakarn, Chantip, Prasartritha, Thavat, Petrakard, Prapoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Multimed Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690703
_version_ 1783247794038898688
author Juntakarn, Chantip
Prasartritha, Thavat
Petrakard, Prapoj
author_facet Juntakarn, Chantip
Prasartritha, Thavat
Petrakard, Prapoj
author_sort Juntakarn, Chantip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem resulting from many risk factors and human behaviors. Some of these may interact synergistically and have been implicated in the cause of low back pain. Massage both traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization as a common practice has been shown to be effective for some subgroup of nonspecific LBP patients. PURPOSE AND SETTING: The trial compared the effectiveness between traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization for treating nonspecific LBP. Some associated factors were included. The study was conducted at the orthopedic outpatient department, Lerdsin General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: Prospective, randomized study was developed without control group. The required sample size was estimated based on previous comparative studies for effectiveness between techniques. Two primary outcome measures were a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) of pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were satisfaction of patients and adverse effects of the treatment. The “intention to treat” (ITT) and per protocol approach were used to compare the significance of the difference between treatment groups PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty hospital outpatients, 20 (16.7%) male and 100 (83.3%) female, were randomized into traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization therapy. The average age of traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization was 50.7 years and 48.3 years, respectively. Both groups received each treatment for approximately 30 minutes twice per week over a four-week period. Total course did not exceed eight sessions. RESULT: With ITT, the mean VAS of traditional Thai massage group before treatment was 5.3 (SD = 1.7) and ODI was 24.9 (SD = 14.7), while in joint mobilization groups, the mean VAS was 5.0 (SD = 1.6) and ODI was 24.6 (SD = 15). After treatment, the mean VAS and ODI were significantly reduced (VAS = 0.51 (SD = 0.89) and ODI = 8.1 (SD = 10.7) for traditional Thai massage, VAS = 0.86 (SD = 1.49) and ODI = 8.26 (SD = 12.97) for joint mobilization). Constipation was found in 34 patients (28.3%). CONCLUSION: The traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization used in this study were equally effective for short-term reduction of pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. Both techniques were safe with short term effect in a chosen group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5495387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Multimed Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54953872017-07-07 The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization Juntakarn, Chantip Prasartritha, Thavat Petrakard, Prapoj Int J Ther Massage Bodywork Research BACKGROUND: Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem resulting from many risk factors and human behaviors. Some of these may interact synergistically and have been implicated in the cause of low back pain. Massage both traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization as a common practice has been shown to be effective for some subgroup of nonspecific LBP patients. PURPOSE AND SETTING: The trial compared the effectiveness between traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization for treating nonspecific LBP. Some associated factors were included. The study was conducted at the orthopedic outpatient department, Lerdsin General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. METHODS: Prospective, randomized study was developed without control group. The required sample size was estimated based on previous comparative studies for effectiveness between techniques. Two primary outcome measures were a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) of pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were satisfaction of patients and adverse effects of the treatment. The “intention to treat” (ITT) and per protocol approach were used to compare the significance of the difference between treatment groups PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty hospital outpatients, 20 (16.7%) male and 100 (83.3%) female, were randomized into traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization therapy. The average age of traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization was 50.7 years and 48.3 years, respectively. Both groups received each treatment for approximately 30 minutes twice per week over a four-week period. Total course did not exceed eight sessions. RESULT: With ITT, the mean VAS of traditional Thai massage group before treatment was 5.3 (SD = 1.7) and ODI was 24.9 (SD = 14.7), while in joint mobilization groups, the mean VAS was 5.0 (SD = 1.6) and ODI was 24.6 (SD = 15). After treatment, the mean VAS and ODI were significantly reduced (VAS = 0.51 (SD = 0.89) and ODI = 8.1 (SD = 10.7) for traditional Thai massage, VAS = 0.86 (SD = 1.49) and ODI = 8.26 (SD = 12.97) for joint mobilization). Constipation was found in 34 patients (28.3%). CONCLUSION: The traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization used in this study were equally effective for short-term reduction of pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. Both techniques were safe with short term effect in a chosen group of patients. Multimed Inc. 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5495387/ /pubmed/28690703 Text en Copyright© The Author(s) 2017. Published by the Massage Therapy Foundation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published under the CreativeCommons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research
Juntakarn, Chantip
Prasartritha, Thavat
Petrakard, Prapoj
The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title_full The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title_short The Effectiveness of Thai Massage and Joint Mobilization
title_sort effectiveness of thai massage and joint mobilization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690703
work_keys_str_mv AT juntakarnchantip theeffectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization
AT prasartrithathavat theeffectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization
AT petrakardprapoj theeffectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization
AT juntakarnchantip effectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization
AT prasartrithathavat effectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization
AT petrakardprapoj effectivenessofthaimassageandjointmobilization