Cargando…

Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients

As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients’ pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa, SATOMI, Junichiro, KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki, YAMAGUCHI, Izumi, YOSHIOKA, Shotaro, KINOUCHI, Tomoya, TADA, Yoshiteru, YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki, MATSUBARA, Shunji, SATOH, Koichi, NAGAHIRO, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381652
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236
Descripción
Sumario:As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients’ pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underwent CAS within 14 days of stroke onset into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) was comprised of patients with progressing neurologic signs and a reversible ischemic penumbra on magnetic resonance images (MRI). They were treated by urgent CAS. Group 2 (n = 36) was neurologically stable and underwent prophylactic CAS. In all patients we recorded the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Urgent CAS resulted in significant improvement in the NIHSS score, when compared before and after CAS in group 1 (5.3 ± 4.3, P < 0.01). The rate of good outcomes (mRS 0–2 at 3 months post-CAS) was 48.6% in group 1, and 75% in group 2. The cumulative incidence of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year was 5.9% in group 1, and 0% in group 2. The procedural complication rate was similar in both groups (group 1: 5.7%, n = 2; group 2: 5.6%, n = 2). No patient suffered a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. When the pathophysiological status and neuroimaging findings are used to determine patient eligibility for urgent CAS, this treatment improve neurologic outcome and can be performed as safely as prophylactic CAS in our cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke.