Cargando…

Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients

As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients’ pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa, SATOMI, Junichiro, KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki, YAMAGUCHI, Izumi, YOSHIOKA, Shotaro, KINOUCHI, Tomoya, TADA, Yoshiteru, YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki, MATSUBARA, Shunji, SATOH, Koichi, NAGAHIRO, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381652
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236
_version_ 1783247876973920256
author KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa
SATOMI, Junichiro
KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki
YAMAGUCHI, Izumi
YOSHIOKA, Shotaro
KINOUCHI, Tomoya
TADA, Yoshiteru
YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki
MATSUBARA, Shunji
SATOH, Koichi
NAGAHIRO, Shinji
author_facet KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa
SATOMI, Junichiro
KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki
YAMAGUCHI, Izumi
YOSHIOKA, Shotaro
KINOUCHI, Tomoya
TADA, Yoshiteru
YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki
MATSUBARA, Shunji
SATOH, Koichi
NAGAHIRO, Shinji
author_sort KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa
collection PubMed
description As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients’ pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underwent CAS within 14 days of stroke onset into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) was comprised of patients with progressing neurologic signs and a reversible ischemic penumbra on magnetic resonance images (MRI). They were treated by urgent CAS. Group 2 (n = 36) was neurologically stable and underwent prophylactic CAS. In all patients we recorded the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Urgent CAS resulted in significant improvement in the NIHSS score, when compared before and after CAS in group 1 (5.3 ± 4.3, P < 0.01). The rate of good outcomes (mRS 0–2 at 3 months post-CAS) was 48.6% in group 1, and 75% in group 2. The cumulative incidence of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year was 5.9% in group 1, and 0% in group 2. The procedural complication rate was similar in both groups (group 1: 5.7%, n = 2; group 2: 5.6%, n = 2). No patient suffered a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. When the pathophysiological status and neuroimaging findings are used to determine patient eligibility for urgent CAS, this treatment improve neurologic outcome and can be performed as safely as prophylactic CAS in our cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5495959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54959592017-09-15 Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa SATOMI, Junichiro KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki YAMAGUCHI, Izumi YOSHIOKA, Shotaro KINOUCHI, Tomoya TADA, Yoshiteru YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki MATSUBARA, Shunji SATOH, Koichi NAGAHIRO, Shinji Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article As the safety and effectiveness of urgent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for neurologically progressing patients remain controversial, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of urgent CAS based on the patients’ pathophysiological condition and neuroimaging findings. We divided 71 patients who underwent CAS within 14 days of stroke onset into two groups. Group 1 (n = 35) was comprised of patients with progressing neurologic signs and a reversible ischemic penumbra on magnetic resonance images (MRI). They were treated by urgent CAS. Group 2 (n = 36) was neurologically stable and underwent prophylactic CAS. In all patients we recorded the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Urgent CAS resulted in significant improvement in the NIHSS score, when compared before and after CAS in group 1 (5.3 ± 4.3, P < 0.01). The rate of good outcomes (mRS 0–2 at 3 months post-CAS) was 48.6% in group 1, and 75% in group 2. The cumulative incidence of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year was 5.9% in group 1, and 0% in group 2. The procedural complication rate was similar in both groups (group 1: 5.7%, n = 2; group 2: 5.6%, n = 2). No patient suffered a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. When the pathophysiological status and neuroimaging findings are used to determine patient eligibility for urgent CAS, this treatment improve neurologic outcome and can be performed as safely as prophylactic CAS in our cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2017-06 2017-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5495959/ /pubmed/28381652 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236 Text en © 2017 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
KANEMATSU, Yasuhisa
SATOMI, Junichiro
KUWAYAMA, Kazuyuki
YAMAGUCHI, Izumi
YOSHIOKA, Shotaro
KINOUCHI, Tomoya
TADA, Yoshiteru
YAMAMOTO, Nobuaki
MATSUBARA, Shunji
SATOH, Koichi
NAGAHIRO, Shinji
Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title_full Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title_fullStr Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title_short Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset – Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients
title_sort treatment outcome of carotid artery stenting underwent within 14 days of stroke onset – consideration of safety and efficacy of urgent carotid artery stenting for neurologically progressing patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5495959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381652
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236
work_keys_str_mv AT kanematsuyasuhisa treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT satomijunichiro treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT kuwayamakazuyuki treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT yamaguchiizumi treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT yoshiokashotaro treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT kinouchitomoya treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT tadayoshiteru treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT yamamotonobuaki treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT matsubarashunji treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT satohkoichi treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients
AT nagahiroshinji treatmentoutcomeofcarotidarterystentingunderwentwithin14daysofstrokeonsetconsiderationofsafetyandefficacyofurgentcarotidarterystentingforneurologicallyprogressingpatients